Suppr超能文献

使用一种新指标——新冠超额死亡率百分比来理解新冠疫苗对死亡的有效性。

Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against Death Using a Novel Measure: COVID Excess Mortality Percentage.

作者信息

Atanasov Vladimir, Barreto Natalia, Whittle Jeff, Meurer John, Weston Benjamin W, Luo Qian Eric, Franchi Lorenzo, Yuan Andy Ye, Zhang Ruohao, Black Bernard

机构信息

Mason College of Business, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA.

Department of Economics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 7;11(2):379. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020379.

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccines have saved millions of lives; however, understanding the long-term effectiveness of these vaccines is imperative to developing recommendations for booster doses and other precautions. Comparisons of mortality rates between more and less vaccinated groups may be misleading due to selection bias, as these groups may differ in underlying health status. We studied all adult deaths during the period of 1 April 2021-30 June 2022 in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, linked to vaccination records, and we used mortality from other natural causes to proxy for underlying health. We report relative COVID-19 mortality risk (RMR) for those vaccinated with two and three doses versus the unvaccinated, using a novel outcome measure that controls for selection effects. This measure, COVID Excess Mortality Percentage (CEMP), uses the non-COVID natural mortality rate (Non-COVID-NMR) as a measure of population risk of COVID mortality without vaccination. We validate this measure during the pre-vaccine period (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.97) and demonstrate that selection effects are large, with non-COVID-NMRs for two-dose vaccinees often less than half those for the unvaccinated, and non-COVID NMRs often still lower for three-dose (booster) recipients. Progressive waning of two-dose effectiveness is observed, with an RMR of 10.6% for two-dose vaccinees aged 60+ versus the unvaccinated during April-June 2021, rising steadily to 36.2% during the Omicron period (January-June, 2022). A booster dose reduced RMR to 9.5% and 10.8% for ages 60+ during the two periods when boosters were available (October-December, 2021; January-June, 2022). Boosters thus provide important additional protection against mortality.

摘要

新冠疫苗已挽救了数百万人的生命;然而,了解这些疫苗的长期有效性对于制定加强针接种建议及其他预防措施至关重要。由于存在选择偏倚,接种疫苗较多和较少的群体之间的死亡率比较可能会产生误导,因为这些群体的潜在健康状况可能不同。我们研究了2021年4月1日至2022年6月30日期间威斯康星州密尔沃基县所有与疫苗接种记录相关的成人死亡情况,并使用其他自然原因导致的死亡率来代表潜在健康状况。我们报告了接种两剂和三剂疫苗者与未接种疫苗者相比的相对新冠死亡率风险(RMR),采用了一种控制选择效应的新结局指标。这个指标,即新冠超额死亡率百分比(CEMP),使用非新冠自然死亡率(Non-COVID-NMR)作为未接种疫苗时人群新冠死亡风险的衡量指标。我们在疫苗接种前时期验证了这个指标(皮尔逊相关系数 = 0.97),并表明选择效应很大,两剂疫苗接种者的非新冠自然死亡率通常不到未接种疫苗者的一半,而三剂(加强针)接种者的非新冠自然死亡率通常更低。观察到两剂疫苗有效性的逐渐减弱,2021年4月至6月期间,60岁及以上的两剂疫苗接种者与未接种疫苗者相比的RMR为10.6%,在奥密克戎时期(2022年1月至6月)稳步上升至36.2%。在有加强针可用的两个时期(2021年10月至12月;2022年1月至6月),60岁及以上人群接种加强针后RMR分别降至9.5%和10.8%。因此,加强针提供了重要的额外死亡保护。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c92/9959409/602b89574aca/vaccines-11-00379-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验