Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China.
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, 107 Huanhudong Road, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, China.
BMC Surg. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01943-6.
Dynesys stabilization (DS) is utilized to preserve mobility at the instrumental segments and prevent adjacent segment pathology in clinical practice. However, the advantages of DS method in medium and long-term follow-up remain controversial.
To compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes between DS and instrumented fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease with or without grade I spondylolisthesis with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years.
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases, Chinese National Knowledge Databases, and Wanfang Database for potentially eligible articles. Clinical outcomes were assessed in terms of VAS and ODI scores, screw loosening and breakage, and surgical revision. Radiographic outcomes were assessed in terms of postoperative range of movement (ROM) and disc heigh. Moreover, adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and adjacent segment disease (ASDis) were evaluated.
Seventeen studies with 1296 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The DS group was associated with significantly lower postoperative VAS scores for low-back and leg pain, and lower rate of surgical revision than the fusion group. Moreover, the Dynesys group showed significantly less ASDeg than the fusion group but showed no significant advantage over the fusion group in terms of preventing ASDis. Additionally, the ROM at the stabilized segments of the fusion group decreased significantly and that at the adjacent segments increased significantly compared with those of the DS group.
DS showed comparable clinical outcomes and provided benefits in preserving the motion at the stabilized segments, thus limiting the hypermobility at the adjacent segments and preventing ASDeg compared with the fusion method in degenerative disease with or without grade I spondylolisthesis.
Dynesys 稳定系统(DS)用于保留仪器节段的活动性并预防相邻节段的病理学,这在临床实践中得到了广泛应用。然而,DS 方法在中、长期随访中的优势仍存在争议。
比较 DS 与器械融合治疗伴或不伴 I 度滑脱的退变性腰椎疾病的影像学和临床结果,随访时间至少 2 年。
我们全面检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 和 Web of Science 数据库、中国知网和万方数据库,以寻找潜在的合格文章。临床结果通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、螺钉松动和断裂以及手术翻修来评估。影像学结果通过术后活动范围(ROM)和椎间盘高度来评估。此外,还评估了相邻节段退变(ASDeg)和相邻节段疾病(ASDis)。
共有 17 项研究,1296 例患者纳入荟萃分析。DS 组术后腰痛和腿痛的 VAS 评分明显低于融合组,手术翻修率也明显低于融合组。此外,与融合组相比,DS 组的 ASDeg 发生率明显较低,但在预防 ASDis 方面与融合组无明显优势。此外,融合组固定节段的 ROM 明显下降,相邻节段的 ROM 明显增加,与 DS 组相比。
DS 与融合方法相比,在伴或不伴 I 度滑脱的退变性疾病中,具有类似的临床结果,在保留固定节段活动度的同时,可限制相邻节段的过度活动,预防 ASDeg。