Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Mar 1;408(1):112. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02846-z.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been carried out as day-case surgery. Current guidelines do not mention the role of drainage after LC. In particular, data stay blank with no prospective study on drainage management when gallbladder perforation (GP) accidentally occurs intraoperatively.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare clinical outcomes of drainage and no drainage after elective day-case LC. Intraoperative GP was recorded. The primary and secondary outcomes were major and minor complications, respectively.
Two hundred patients were randomized. No major complications occurred in either group. In secondary outcomes, nausea/vomiting, pain, hospital stay, and cost were similar in the drainage group and no drainage group; postoperative fever, WBC, and CRP levels were significantly lower in the no drainage group. GP occurred in 32 patients. Male patients with higher BMI and CRP and abdominal pain within 1 month were more likely to occur GP. Subgroup analysis of GP, primary outcomes, and most secondary outcomes had no difference. Postoperative WBC and CRP were higher in the drainage group. Postoperative fever occurred in 63 patients. Univariate analysis of fever showed that blood loss, drainage, postoperative WBC, CRP, and hospital stay were significant. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that drainage was an independent risk factor for fever after LC (OR 3.418, 95% CI 1.392-8.390; p = 0.007).
No drainage after elective day-case LC is safe and associated with fewer complications, even in intraoperative GP. The trial proves that drainage is an independent risk factor for postoperative fever. The use of a drain after LC may lead to an unsuccessful day-case procedure by causing fever, elevated CRP, and extended hospital stay (NCT03909360).
腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)已作为日间手术进行。目前的指南并未提及 LC 后引流的作用。特别是,当术中意外发生胆囊穿孔(GP)时,没有前瞻性研究对引流管理的数据进行记录。
我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了择期日间 LC 后引流与不引流的临床效果。记录术中 GP。主要和次要结局分别为主要和次要并发症。
共有 200 例患者被随机分组。两组均未发生主要并发症。在次要结局方面,引流组和不引流组的恶心/呕吐、疼痛、住院时间和费用相似;不引流组术后发热、白细胞计数和 C 反应蛋白水平显著较低。32 例患者发生 GP。BMI 较高、CRP 较高和术后 1 个月内腹痛的男性患者更有可能发生 GP。GP 亚组分析、主要结局和大多数次要结局均无差异。引流组术后白细胞计数和 C 反应蛋白较高。63 例患者术后发热。发热的单因素分析显示,出血量、引流、术后白细胞计数、C 反应蛋白和住院时间有显著差异。多变量 logistic 回归分析表明,引流是 LC 后发热的独立危险因素(OR 3.418,95%CI 1.392-8.390;p = 0.007)。
择期日间 LC 后不引流是安全的,并且与更少的并发症相关,即使在术中发生 GP 也是如此。该试验证明引流是术后发热的独立危险因素。LC 后使用引流管可能会导致发热、C 反应蛋白升高和住院时间延长,从而导致日间手术失败(NCT03909360)。