Suppr超能文献

连枷胸或多发性肋骨骨折的固定:当前证据和处理方法。系统评价和荟萃分析。

Fixation of flail chest or multiple rib fractures: current evidence and how to proceed. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):631-644. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1020-x. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to present current evidence on rib fixation and to compare effect estimates obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched on June 16th 2017 for both RCTs and observational studies comparing rib fixation versus nonoperative treatment. The MINORS criteria were used to assess study quality. Where possible, data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. The primary outcome measure was mortality. Secondary outcome measures were hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), pneumonia, and tracheostomy.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included resulting in 5874 patients with flail chest or multiple rib fractures: 1255 received rib fixation and 4619 nonoperative treatment. Rib fixation for flail chest reduced mortality compared to nonoperative treatment with a risk ratio of 0.41 (95% CI 0.27, 0.61, p < 0.001, I = 0%). Furthermore, rib fixation resulted in a shorter ILOS, DMV, lower pneumonia rate, and need for tracheostomy. Results from recent studies showed lower mortality and shorter DMV after rib fixation, but there were no significant differences for the other outcome measures. There was insufficient data to perform meta-analyses on rib fixation for multiple rib fractures. Pooled results from RCTs and observational studies were similar for all outcome measures, although results from RCTs showed a larger treatment effect for HLOS, ILOS, and DMV compared to observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Rib fixation for flail chest improves short-term outcome, although the indication and patient subgroup who would benefit most remain unclear. There is insufficient data regarding treatment for multiple rib fractures. Observational studies show similar results compared with RCTs.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在呈现当前关于肋骨固定的证据,并比较随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究获得的效应估计值。

方法

于 2017 年 6 月 16 日检索 MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL 和 CINAHL,以纳入比较肋骨固定与非手术治疗的 RCT 和观察性研究。采用 MINORS 标准评估研究质量。在可能的情况下,使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总数据。主要结局指标为死亡率。次要结局指标为住院时间(HLOS)、重症监护病房时间(ILOS)、机械通气时间(DMV)、肺炎和气管切开术。

结果

纳入 33 项研究,共纳入 5874 例连枷胸或多发性肋骨骨折患者:1255 例接受肋骨固定,4619 例接受非手术治疗。与非手术治疗相比,连枷胸肋骨固定降低死亡率,风险比为 0.41(95%CI 0.27,0.61,p<0.001,I=0%)。此外,肋骨固定还可缩短 ILOS、DMV、降低肺炎发生率和气管切开术需求。近期研究结果显示,肋骨固定后死亡率和 DMV 较短,但其他结局指标无显著差异。由于缺乏数据,无法对多发性肋骨骨折的肋骨固定进行荟萃分析。RCT 和观察性研究的汇总结果在所有结局指标上均相似,尽管 RCT 的结果显示 HLOS、ILOS 和 DMV 的治疗效果大于观察性研究。

结论

连枷胸肋骨固定可改善短期预后,但适应证和最受益的患者亚组仍不明确。关于多发性肋骨骨折的治疗,数据不足。观察性研究的结果与 RCT 相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05a4/6689030/ed2b5987a216/68_2018_1020_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验