Li Tianxi, Zuo Xiaoxia, Zhang Tong, Liu Lei, Wang Zhongzheng, Han Lin, Liu Hu, Wang Zijin
Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
School of Medical Technology, Jiangsu College of Nursing, Huai'an, China.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Jun;12(3):1535-1545. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00685-1. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
There is a high prevalence of intermittent exotropia and exophoria in myopic populations, and orthokeratology is one of the effective interventions to control myopia progression in children. However, it is still obscure whether intermittent exotropia and exophoria children could wear orthokeratology without experiencing aggravated lens decentration.
This was a multi-center, prospective cohort study. A total of 123 myopic participants aged 8-14 years were recruited, where conditions of deviation included intermittent exotropia, exophoria, and orthophoria. Uncorrected visual acuity and corneal topography data were obtained at baseline and after 1 month of wearing orthokeratology lens. Lens decentration was analyzed in a MATLAB program. Magnitude of deviation and refractive errors were evaluated prior to orthokeratology treatment. Fisher's exact test, ANOVA test, and univariate and multivariate linear regression models were established to evaluate the role of magnitude of deviation in lens decentration.
There was no significant difference in magnitude and direction of lens decentration among three groups (magnitude: F = 1.25, P = 0.289; direction: Fisher = 9.91, P = 0.078). According to scale division of decentration, 1 (2.6%) intermittent exotropia subject, 2 (3.8%) exophoria subjects, and 1 (3.0%) orthophoria subject experienced severe decentration (Fisher = 1.10, P = 0.947). Inferotemporal decentration was most common among all subjects (intermittent exotropia 50.0%, exophoria 76.9%, orthophoria 72.7%). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses revealed that magnitude of deviation was not an independent risk factor for lens decentration [β = -0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.01-0.00, P = 0.180], while surface asymmetry index (SAI) (β = 0.21, 95% CI 0.02-0.40, P = 0.028) and surface regularity index (SRI) (β = -0.39, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.13, P = 0.004) had significant correlation with polar decentration.
Patients with intermittent exotropia and exophoria exhibit non-aggravated lens decentration after orthokeratology application. Thus, lens decentration is not the concern for orthokeratology prescription.
近视人群中间歇性外斜视和外隐斜的患病率较高,角膜塑形术是控制儿童近视进展的有效干预措施之一。然而,间歇性外斜视和外隐斜儿童佩戴角膜塑形镜是否会加重镜片偏位仍不清楚。
这是一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。共招募了123名8-14岁的近视参与者,其斜视情况包括间歇性外斜视、外隐斜和正位视。在佩戴角膜塑形镜前及佩戴1个月后获取未矫正视力和角膜地形图数据。在MATLAB程序中分析镜片偏位情况。在角膜塑形术治疗前评估斜视度数和屈光不正情况。建立Fisher精确检验、方差分析以及单变量和多变量线性回归模型来评估斜视度数在镜片偏位中的作用。
三组之间镜片偏位的程度和方向无显著差异(程度:F = 1.25,P = 0.289;方向:Fisher = 9.91,P = 0.078)。根据偏位程度划分,1名(2.6%)间歇性外斜视患者、2名(3.8%)外隐斜患者和1名(3.0%)正位视患者出现严重偏位(Fisher = 1.10,P = 0.947)。下颞侧偏位在所有受试者中最为常见(间歇性外斜视50.0%,外隐斜76.9%,正位视72.7%)。单变量和多变量线性回归分析显示,斜视度数不是镜片偏位的独立危险因素[β = -0.00,95%置信区间(CI)-0.01 - 0.00,P = 0.180],而表面不对称指数(SAI)(β = 0.21,95% CI 0.02 - 0.40,P = 0.028)和表面规则性指数(SRI)(β = -0.39,95% CI -0.66至-0.13,P = 0.0