Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;229(3):288.e1-288.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.022. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
Despite previous research findings on higher risks of stillbirth among pregnant individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is unclear whether the gestational timing of viral infection modulates this risk.
This study aimed to examine the association between timing of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and risk of stillbirth.
This retrospective cohort study used multilevel logistic regression analyses of nationwide electronic health records in the United States. Data were from 75 healthcare systems and institutes across 50 states. A total of 191,403 pregnancies of 190,738 individuals of reproductive age (15-49 years) who had childbirth between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021 were identified and included. The main outcome was stillbirth at ≥20 weeks of gestation. Exposures were the timing of SARS-CoV-2 infection: early pregnancy (<20 weeks), midpregnancy (21-27 weeks), the third trimester (28-43 weeks), any time before delivery, and never infected (reference).
We identified 2342 (1.3%) pregnancies with COVID-19 in early pregnancy, 2075 (1.2%) in midpregnancy, and 12,697 (6.9%) in the third trimester. After adjusting for maternal and clinical characteristics, increased odds of stillbirth were observed among pregnant individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection only in early pregnancy (odds ratio, 1.75, 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.46) and midpregnancy (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-2.93), as opposed to pregnant individuals who were never infected. Older age, Black race, hypertension, acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute respiratory failure, and placental abruption were found to be consistently associated with stillbirth across different trimesters.
Increased risk of stillbirth was associated with COVID-19 only when pregnant individuals were infected during early and midpregnancy, and not at any time before the delivery or during the third trimester, suggesting the potential vulnerability of the fetus to SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy. Our findings underscore the importance of proactive COVID-19 prevention and timely medical intervention for individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during early and midpregnancy.
尽管先前的研究发现,感染 SARS-CoV-2 的孕妇发生死胎的风险更高,但尚不清楚病毒感染的妊娠时间是否会影响这种风险。
本研究旨在探讨孕妇感染 SARS-CoV-2 的时间与死胎风险之间的关联。
这是一项在美国全国范围内电子健康记录中进行的回顾性队列研究。数据来自美国 50 个州的 75 个医疗保健系统和机构。共确定并纳入了 190738 名育龄期(15-49 岁)个体的 191403 次妊娠,这些个体在 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 31 日之间分娩。主要结局是妊娠 20 周及以上的死胎。暴露因素是 SARS-CoV-2 感染的时间:早孕期(<20 周)、中孕期(21-27 周)、孕晚期(28-43 周)、分娩前任何时间以及从未感染过(参照组)。
我们发现,早孕期有 2342(1.3%)例妊娠合并 COVID-19,中孕期有 2075(1.2%)例,孕晚期有 12697(6.9%)例。调整母体和临床特征后,仅在早孕期(比值比,1.75,95%置信区间,1.25-2.46)和中孕期(比值比,2.09;95%置信区间,1.49-2.93)感染 SARS-CoV-2 的孕妇中观察到死胎的几率增加,而从未感染过的孕妇中则没有这种情况。在不同的孕期,年龄较大、黑人种族、高血压、急性呼吸窘迫综合征或急性呼吸衰竭以及胎盘早剥均与死胎显著相关。
仅在孕妇感染 SARS-CoV-2 的早孕期和中孕期时,死胎风险增加,而在分娩前任何时间或孕晚期时,风险并未增加,这表明胎儿在早孕期易受 SARS-CoV-2 感染的影响。我们的研究结果强调了在早孕期和中孕期感染 SARS-CoV-2 的个体中积极预防 COVID-19 并及时进行医学干预的重要性。