• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 时代戴口罩说话:声学和感知参数的多类机器学习分类。

Speaking with mask in the COVID-19 era: Multiclass machine learning classification of acoustic and perceptual parameters.

机构信息

Department of Information Engineering, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.

Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Feb;153(2):1204. doi: 10.1121/10.0017244.

DOI:10.1121/10.0017244
PMID:36859154
Abstract

The intensive use of personal protective equipment often requires increasing voice intensity, with possible development of voice disorders. This paper exploits machine learning approaches to investigate the impact of different types of masks on sustained vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/ and the sequence /a'jw/ inside a standardized sentence. Both objective acoustical parameters and subjective ratings were used for statistical analysis, multiple comparisons, and in multivariate machine learning classification experiments. Significant differences were found between mask+shield configuration and no-mask and between mask and mask+shield conditions. Power spectral density decreases with statistical significance above 1.5 kHz when wearing masks. Subjective ratings confirmed increasing discomfort from no-mask condition to protective masks and shield. Machine learning techniques proved that masks alter voice production: in a multiclass experiment, random forest (RF) models were able to distinguish amongst seven masks conditions with up to 94% validation accuracy, separating masked from unmasked conditions with up to 100% validation accuracy and detecting the shield presence with up to 86% validation accuracy. Moreover, an RF classifier allowed distinguishing male from female subject in masked conditions with 100% validation accuracy. Combining acoustic and perceptual analysis represents a robust approach to characterize masks configurations and quantify the corresponding level of discomfort.

摘要

个人防护设备的密集使用通常需要提高声音强度,这可能导致嗓音障碍。本文利用机器学习方法研究了不同类型的口罩对持续元音 /a/、/i/、/u/ 和标准句子中的 /a'jw/ 的影响。客观声学参数和主观评分都用于统计分析、多重比较和多元机器学习分类实验。在口罩+面罩配置和无口罩以及口罩和口罩+面罩条件之间发现了显著差异。佩戴口罩时,在 1.5kHz 以上,功率谱密度会显著降低。主观评分证实,从无口罩状态到防护口罩和面罩,不适感会增加。机器学习技术证明口罩会改变发声:在多类实验中,随机森林 (RF) 模型能够以高达 94%的验证准确率区分七种口罩状态,以高达 100%的验证准确率区分有口罩和无口罩状态,并以高达 86%的验证准确率检测到面罩的存在。此外,RF 分类器能够以 100%的验证准确率区分有口罩的男性和女性被试。结合声学和感知分析是一种强大的方法,可以描述口罩配置并量化相应的不适程度。

相似文献

1
Speaking with mask in the COVID-19 era: Multiclass machine learning classification of acoustic and perceptual parameters.在 COVID-19 时代戴口罩说话:声学和感知参数的多类机器学习分类。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Feb;153(2):1204. doi: 10.1121/10.0017244.
2
Effect of FFP2/3 Masks on Voice Range Profile Measurement and Voice Acoustics in Routine Voice Diagnostics.FFP2/3 口罩对常规语音诊断中的语音范围谱测量和语音声学的影响。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(5):335-344. doi: 10.1159/000524299. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.摩擦音的声学特征、共振峰幅度和使用与不使用医用口罩说话的清晰度。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):366-380. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12705. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
Are Acoustic Markers of Voice and Speech Signals Affected by Nose-and-Mouth-Covering Respiratory Protective Masks?口鼻覆盖式呼吸防护口罩会影响语音和言语信号的声学标记吗?
J Voice. 2023 May;37(3):468.e1-468.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
5
Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.佩戴和不佩戴口罩时的声学语音特征。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85130-8.
6
How Face Masks Affect Acoustic and Auditory Perceptual Characteristics of the Singing Voice.口罩对面部声音声学和听觉感知特征的影响。
J Voice. 2023 Jul;37(4):515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.028. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
COVID-19: Acoustic Measures of Voice in Individuals Wearing Different Facemasks.COVID-19:不同口罩佩戴者的嗓音声学测量。
J Voice. 2023 Nov;37(6):971.e1-971.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
8
Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols.口罩对面部分析和言语感知的影响:对大流行前协议的启示。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Dec;148(6):3562. doi: 10.1121/10.0002873.
9
Impact of Face Masks on Speech Acoustics and Vocal Effort in Healthcare Professionals.口罩对面部语音声学和医护人员发声用力的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Feb;132(2):391-397. doi: 10.1002/lary.29763. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
Reliability of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index AVQI and the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) when wearing CoViD-19 protective masks.佩戴 COVID-19 防护口罩时,声学语音质量指数(AVQI)和声学粗糙声指数(ABI)的可靠性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Sep;279(9):4617-4621. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07417-4. Epub 2022 May 6.