• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一致的领导者-跟随者关系的学习获取取决于内隐触觉交互。

Learning acquisition of consistent leader-follower relationships depends on implicit haptic interactions.

机构信息

Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Seika, Japan.

Graduate School of Engineering Division of Mechanical Engineering, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29722-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-29722-6
PMID:36859436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9977766/
Abstract

Are leaders made or born? Leader-follower roles have been well characterized in social science, but they remain somewhat obscure in sensory-motor coordination. Furthermore, it is unknown how and why leader-follower relationships are acquired, including innate versus acquired controversies. We developed a novel asymmetrical coordination task in which two participants (dyad) need to collaborate in transporting a simulated beam while maintaining its horizontal attitude. This experimental paradigm was implemented by twin robotic manipulanda, simulated beam dynamics, haptic interactions, and a projection screen. Clear leader-follower relationships were learned only when strong haptic feedback was introduced. This phenomenon occurred despite participants not being informed that they were interacting with each other and the large number of equally-valid alternative dyadic coordination strategies. We demonstrate the emergence of consistent leader-follower relationships in sensory-motor coordination, and further show that haptic interaction is essential for dyadic co-adaptation. These results provide insights into neural mechanisms responsible for the formation of leader-follower relationships in our society.

摘要

领导者是天生的还是后天造就的?领导者-追随者的角色在社会科学中已经得到了很好的描述,但在感觉运动协调中仍然有些模糊。此外,人们还不知道领导者-追随者关系是如何以及为什么被获得的,包括先天与后天的争议。我们开发了一种新的非对称协调任务,其中两个参与者(二人组)需要在保持模拟梁的水平姿态的同时协作运输它。这个实验范式通过双机器人操纵器、模拟梁动力学、触觉交互和投影屏幕来实现。只有当引入强烈的触觉反馈时,才会学习到清晰的领导者-追随者关系。尽管参与者不知道他们在相互交互,并且有大量同样有效的替代二元协调策略,但这种现象还是发生了。我们展示了在感觉运动协调中一致的领导者-追随者关系的出现,并进一步表明触觉交互对于二元共同适应是必不可少的。这些结果为我们社会中领导者-追随者关系形成的神经机制提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/912e6453487e/41598_2023_29722_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/7bf6564c2f4d/41598_2023_29722_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/df1c2073617c/41598_2023_29722_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/910c1bd9c5c8/41598_2023_29722_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/7b50bfb55f63/41598_2023_29722_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/912e6453487e/41598_2023_29722_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/7bf6564c2f4d/41598_2023_29722_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/df1c2073617c/41598_2023_29722_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/910c1bd9c5c8/41598_2023_29722_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/7b50bfb55f63/41598_2023_29722_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/9977766/912e6453487e/41598_2023_29722_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning acquisition of consistent leader-follower relationships depends on implicit haptic interactions.一致的领导者-跟随者关系的学习获取取决于内隐触觉交互。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29722-6.
2
Interpersonal Coordination between Female Soccer Players: Leader-Follower Roles within a Collision-Avoidance Task.女足运动员之间的人际协调:避免碰撞任务中的领导-跟随角色。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024 May 1;19(5):548-560. doi: 10.26603/001c.116156. eCollection 2024.
3
Frontal alpha oscillations distinguish leaders from followers: multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains.额alpha 振荡区分领导者和追随者:相互作用的大脑的多元解码。
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 1;94:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
4
The physiological basis of leader-follower roles in the dyadic alternating tapping task.二元交替敲击任务中领导者-跟随者角色的生理基础。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 30;14:1232016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232016. eCollection 2023.
5
Towards functional robotic training: motor learning of dynamic tasks is enhanced by haptic rendering but hampered by arm weight support.迈向功能性机器人训练:触觉渲染可增强动态任务的运动学习,但会受到手臂重量支撑的阻碍。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Feb 13;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-00993-w.
6
Don't Go Chasing Narcissists: A Relational-Based and Multiverse Perspective on Leader Narcissism and Follower Engagement Using a Machine Learning Approach.勿追自恋者:基于关系和多宇宙视角的领导自恋与追随者投入的机器学习研究
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jul;49(7):1130-1147. doi: 10.1177/01461672221094976. Epub 2022 May 27.
7
Effect of Dyadic Haptic Collaboration on Ankle Motor Learning and Task Performance.二元触觉协作对踝关节运动学习和任务表现的影响。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:416-425. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3225759. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
8
Leader-follower behavioural coordination and neural synchronization during intergroup conflict.群体间冲突中领导者-跟随者行为协调和神经同步。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;7(12):2169-2181. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01663-0. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
9
Plasticity in leader-follower roles in human teams.人类团队中领导者-追随者角色的可塑性。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 6;7(1):14562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14851-6.
10
A Study of the Mechanism of the Congruence of Leader-Follower Power Distance Orientation on Employees' Task Performance.领导者-追随者权力距离取向一致性对员工任务绩效的影响机制研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 26;10:615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00615. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Directed causal effect with PCMCI in hyperscanning EEG time series.超扫描脑电图时间序列中使用PCMCI的定向因果效应。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Apr 15;18:1305918. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1305918. eCollection 2024.
2
Motor Learning in Robot-Based Haptic Dyads: A Review.基于机器人的触觉二元组中的运动学习:综述
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2024 Oct-Dec;17(4):510-527. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2024.3379035. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Lift observation conveys object weight distribution but partly enhances predictive lift planning.提升观察传达了物体的重量分布,但部分增强了预测性提升规划。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Apr 1;125(4):1348-1366. doi: 10.1152/jn.00374.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Observation of Both Skilled and Erroneous Object Lifting Can Improve Predictive Force Scaling in the Observer.观察熟练和错误的物体举升动作均能提高观察者的预测力缩放能力。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Oct 22;13:373. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00373. eCollection 2019.
3
Individuals physically interacting in a group rapidly coordinate their movement by estimating the collective goal.
个体在群体中进行身体互动时,通过估计集体目标来快速协调他们的运动。
Elife. 2019 Feb 12;8:e41328. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41328.
4
The Emergence of Social Norms and Conventions.社会规范和惯例的出现。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Feb;23(2):158-169. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Haptic communication between humans is tuned by the hard or soft mechanics of interaction.人类之间的触觉交流是通过相互作用的硬度或柔软度来调节的。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Mar 22;14(3):e1005971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005971. eCollection 2018 Mar.
6
Small forces that differ with prior motor experience can communicate movement goals during human-human physical interaction.在人际身体互动过程中,与先前运动经验不同的小力量能够传达运动目标。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jan 31;14(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0217-2.
7
Motion Plan Changes Predictably in Dyadic Reaching.在双人伸手动作中,运动计划会出现可预测的变化。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 2;11(12):e0167314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167314. eCollection 2016.
8
Physical Collaboration of Human-Human and Human-Robot Teams.人类与人类团队以及人类与机器人团队的物理协作。
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2008 Jul-Dec;1(2):108-120. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2008.13. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
9
On the analysis of movement smoothness.关于运动平滑度的分析。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Dec 9;12:112. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0090-9.
10
Flexible Control of Safety Margins for Action Based on Environmental Variability.基于环境变异性的行动安全边际灵活控制。
J Neurosci. 2015 Jun 17;35(24):9106-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1883-14.2015.