State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;7(12):2169-2181. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01663-0. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
Leaders can launch hostile attacks on out-groups and organize in-group defence. Whether groups settle the conflict in their favour depends, however, on whether followers align with leader's initiatives. Yet how leader and followers coordinate during intergroup conflict remains unknown. Participants in small groups elected a leader and made costly contributions to intergroup conflict while dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activity was simultaneously measured. Leaders were more sacrificial and their contribution influenced group survival to a greater extent during in-group defence than during out-group attacks. Leaders also had increased DLPFC activity when defending in-group, which predicted their comparatively strong contribution to conflict; followers reciprocated their leader's initiatives the more their DLPFC activity synchronized with that of their leader. When launching attacks, however, leaders and followers aligned poorly at behavioural and neural levels, which explained why out-group attacks often failed. Our results provide a neurobehavioural account of leader-follower coordination during intergroup conflict and reveal leader-follower behavioural/neural alignment as pivotal for groups settling conflicts in their favour.
领导者可以对外部群体发动敌意攻击,并组织内部群体进行防御。然而,群体是否能够以有利于自己的方式解决冲突,取决于追随者是否认同领导者的倡议。然而,在群体间冲突期间,领导者和追随者如何协调仍然未知。在小群体中,参与者选举出一名领导者,并在群体间冲突中做出昂贵的贡献,同时测量背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的活动。在内部群体防御期间,领导者更愿意做出牺牲,并且他们的贡献对群体生存的影响程度大于在外部群体攻击期间。当内部群体防御时,领导者的 DLPFC 活动也会增加,这预示着他们对冲突的贡献相对较强;追随者的 DLPFC 活动与领导者的活动同步程度越高,他们对领导者的倡议回应就越多。然而,在发动攻击时,领导者和追随者在行为和神经水平上的配合很差,这解释了为什么外部群体的攻击往往失败。我们的研究结果提供了一个关于群体间冲突期间领导者-追随者协调的神经行为解释,并揭示了领导者-追随者行为/神经同步对群体以有利于自己的方式解决冲突的至关重要性。