Rauschenberger Vera, Piro Inken, Kasaragod Vikram Babu, Hörlin Verena, Eckes Anna-Lena, Kluck Christoph J, Schindelin Hermann, Meinck Hans-Michael, Wickel Jonathan, Geis Christian, Tüzün Erdem, Doppler Kathrin, Sommer Claudia, Villmann Carmen
Institute of Clinical Neurobiology, University Hospital, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Front Mol Neurosci. 2023 Feb 13;16:1089101. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1089101. eCollection 2023.
Glycine receptor (GlyR) autoantibodies are associated with stiff-person syndrome and the life-threatening progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus in children and adults. Patient histories show variability in symptoms and responses to therapeutic treatments. A better understanding of the autoantibody pathology is required to develop improved therapeutic strategies. So far, the underlying molecular pathomechanisms include enhanced receptor internalization and direct receptor blocking altering GlyR function. A common epitope of autoantibodies against the GlyRα1 has been previously defined to residues A-G at the N-terminus of the mature GlyR extracellular domain. However, if other autoantibody binding sites exist or additional GlyR residues are involved in autoantibody binding is yet unknown. The present study investigates the importance of receptor glycosylation for binding of anti-GlyR autoantibodies. The glycine receptor α1 harbors only one glycosylation site at the amino acid residue asparagine 38 localized in close vicinity to the identified common autoantibody epitope. First, non-glycosylated GlyRs were characterized using protein biochemical approaches as well as electrophysiological recordings and molecular modeling. Molecular modeling of nonglycosylated GlyRα1 did not show major structural alterations. Moreover, non-glycosylation of the GlyRα1 did not prevent the receptor from surface expression. At the functional level, the non-glycosylated GlyR demonstrated reduced glycine potency, but patient GlyR autoantibodies still bound to the surface-expressed non-glycosylated receptor protein in living cells. Efficient adsorption of GlyR autoantibodies from patient samples was possible by binding to native glycosylated and non-glycosylated GlyRα1 expressed in living not fixed transfected HEK293 cells. Binding of patient-derived GlyR autoantibodies to the non-glycosylated GlyRα1 offered the possibility to use purified non-glycosylated GlyR extracellular domain constructs coated on ELISA plates and use them as a fast screening readout for the presence of GlyR autoantibodies in patient serum samples. Following successful adsorption of patient autoantibodies by GlyR ECDs, binding to primary motoneurons and transfected cells was absent. Our results indicate that the glycine receptor autoantibody binding is independent of the receptor's glycosylation state. Purified non-glycosylated receptor domains harbouring the autoantibody epitope thus provide, an additional reliable experimental tool besides binding to native receptors in cell-based assays for detection of autoantibody presence in patient sera.
甘氨酸受体(GlyR)自身抗体与僵人综合征以及儿童和成人中危及生命的伴有僵硬和肌阵挛的进行性脑脊髓炎相关。患者病史显示症状和对治疗的反应存在差异。为了制定更好的治疗策略,需要更深入地了解自身抗体病理学。到目前为止,潜在的分子发病机制包括增强的受体内化和直接的受体阻断,从而改变GlyR功能。先前已确定针对GlyRα1的自身抗体的一个共同表位位于成熟GlyR细胞外结构域N端的A - G残基处。然而,是否存在其他自身抗体结合位点或其他GlyR残基是否参与自身抗体结合尚不清楚。本研究调查了受体糖基化对抗GlyR自身抗体结合的重要性。甘氨酸受体α1在氨基酸残基天冬酰胺38处仅有一个糖基化位点,该位点位于已确定的共同自身抗体表位附近。首先,使用蛋白质生化方法、电生理记录和分子建模对非糖基化的GlyR进行了表征。非糖基化GlyRα1的分子建模未显示主要结构改变。此外,GlyRα1的非糖基化并不妨碍受体在表面表达。在功能水平上,非糖基化的GlyR表现出甘氨酸效力降低,但患者的GlyR自身抗体仍能与活细胞中表面表达的非糖基化受体蛋白结合。通过与在未固定转染的活HEK293细胞中表达的天然糖基化和非糖基化GlyRα1结合,可以有效地从患者样本中吸附GlyR自身抗体。患者来源的GlyR自身抗体与非糖基化GlyRα1的结合提供了一种可能性,即使用包被在ELISA板上的纯化非糖基化GlyR细胞外结构域构建体,并将其用作快速筛选患者血清样本中GlyR自身抗体存在情况的读数。在GlyR细胞外结构域成功吸附患者自身抗体后,其与初级运动神经元和转染细胞的结合消失。我们的结果表明,甘氨酸受体自身抗体的结合与受体的糖基化状态无关。因此,除了在基于细胞的检测中与天然受体结合之外,含有自身抗体表位的纯化非糖基化受体结构域为检测患者血清中自身抗体的存在提供了另一种可靠的实验工具。