Wang Hui, Liang Xiao, Xu Jiaxin, Sun Jiayuan, Yang Dalong, Li Weishi, Ding Wenyuan
Spine Department, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Department of Orthopaedic, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 13;10:1116590. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1116590. eCollection 2023.
To assess the intra- and interobserver reliability by observer training level used for selecting the end vertebra (EV), neutral vertebra (NV), stable vertebra (SV), and first coronal reverse vertebrae (FCRV) in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients.
Fifty consecutive upright long-cassette radiographs and CT examination of operative cases of DLS were evaluated by three surgeons at various levels of training. For each iteration, the observers attempted to identify the UEV, NV and SV from x-ray, and FCRV from the CT examination. Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed by means of Cohen's Kappa correlation coefficient, and raw percentages of agreement were recorded.
Intraobserver reliability was excellent for determining FCRV ( = 0.761-0.837), fair to good for determining UEV ( = 0.530-0.636), fair to good for determining SV ( = 0.519-0.644), and fair to good for determining NV ( = 0.504-0.734), respectively. Additionally, we also noted a trend towards better intraobserver reliability with increasing levels of experience. Interobserver reliability was poor between observers beyond chance for UEV, NV, SV ( = 0.105-0.358), and good reliability for FCRV ( = 0.581-0.624). All three observers agreed on the same level of the FCRV in 24 patients of the time, which presented less Coronal imbalance type C compared to the other 26 patients.
Experience and training level of the observers are important factors affecting the accurate identification of these vertebrae in DLS, intraobserver reliability increases along with increasing levels of observer experience. FCRV is superior to UEV, NV, and SV in the accuracy of identification, Type C coronal malalignment could affect the accurate identification of FCRV.
通过用于选择退变性腰椎侧凸(DLS)患者的终椎(EV)、中立椎(NV)、稳定椎(SV)和第一冠状反向椎(FCRV)的观察者培训水平,评估观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。
由三名处于不同培训水平的外科医生对50例连续的DLS手术病例的直立长盒式X线片和CT检查进行评估。对于每次评估,观察者尝试从X线片中识别上位终椎(UEV)、NV和SV,并从CT检查中识别FCRV。通过Cohen's Kappa相关系数评估观察者内和观察者间的可靠性,并记录一致率的原始百分比。
观察者内可靠性在确定FCRV时为优(κ = 0.761 - 0.837),在确定UEV时为中等至良好(κ = 0.530 - 0.636),在确定SV时为中等至良好(κ = 0.519 - 0.644),在确定NV时为中等至良好(κ = 0.504 - 0.734)。此外,我们还注意到随着经验水平的提高,观察者内可靠性有提高的趋势。观察者间可靠性在UEV、NV、SV方面较差(κ = 0.105 - 0.358),而在FCRV方面可靠性良好(κ = 0.581 - 0.624)。在24例患者中,所有三名观察者对FCRV的同一水平达成一致,与其他26例患者相比,这些患者的C型冠状面失衡较少。
观察者的经验和培训水平是影响DLS中这些椎体准确识别的重要因素,观察者内可靠性随着观察者经验水平的提高而增加。FCRV在识别准确性方面优于UEV、NV和SV,C型冠状面排列不齐可能影响FCRV的准确识别。