Murray T H
Institute for the Medical Humanities, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77550.
Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(6):637-44. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90090-6.
Medical ethics is commonly assumed to be a form of 'applied moral philosophy' in which practical moral judgments are deduced from moral theories. This account of the relationship between moral theory and moral judgment is inadequate in several reports. The deductivist approach often results in inadequate attention being given to social, historical and developmental contexts. It also fails to explain some common phenomena in practical moral reasoning. In contrast to the emphasis in deductivism, a case-centered or casuistic practical ethics insists on immersion in the particularities of cases and on interpretation of details in light of moral maxims and other mid-level forms of moral reasoning. Two features of casuistics that ought to be distinguished but frequently are not, are: (1) the emphasis on immersion and interpretation, and (2) a claim about the relation between moral judgment and moral theory as sources of moral knowledge. Once we consider case-centered moral judgments as sources of moral knowledge, we must also begin to look critically but open-mindedly to moral traditions which, upon examination, appear to be more dynamic and to have more reformist potential than is commonly assumed.
医学伦理学通常被认为是“应用道德哲学”的一种形式,其中实际的道德判断是从道德理论推导出来的。在几份报告中,这种对道德理论与道德判断之间关系的描述并不充分。演绎主义方法往往导致对社会、历史和发展背景的关注不足。它也无法解释实际道德推理中的一些常见现象。与演绎主义的侧重点不同,以案例为中心或决疑法的实践伦理学坚持深入研究案例的特殊性,并根据道德准则和其他中级道德推理形式来解读细节。决疑法的两个应该区分但经常未被区分的特征是:(1)强调深入研究和解读,以及(2)关于道德判断与作为道德知识来源的道德理论之间关系的一种主张。一旦我们将以案例为中心的道德判断视为道德知识的来源,我们也必须开始以批判性但开放的态度审视道德传统,经审视会发现,这些传统似乎比通常认为的更具活力,且具有更大的改革潜力。