Suppr超能文献

医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)在稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)个体中的心理测量特性:系统评价。

Psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in individuals with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Apr;46(7):1230-1238. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2182918. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is used to assess anxiety and depression in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, its measurement properties lack critical appraisal. We aimed to summarize and critically appraise the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the HADS in COPD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five electronic databases were searched. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines were used to assess the methodological and evidence quality in the selected studies.

RESULTS

Twelve studies assessed the psychometric properties of the HADS-Total and its subscales HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression in COPD. High-quality evidence supported the structural and criterion validity of the HADS-A, the internal consistency of the HADS-T, HADS-A, and HADS-D with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.73-0.87, and before-after treatment responsiveness of HADS-T and its subscales (minimal clinically important difference = 1.4-2; effect size = 0.45-1.40). Moderate-quality evidence supported the test-retest reliability of the HADS-A and HADS-D with excellent coefficient values of 0.86-0.90.

CONCLUSIONS

The HADS-A is recommended for use in individuals with stable COPD. The lack of high-quality evidence on the validity of the HADS-D and HADS-T prevented drawing robust conclusions about their clinical utility in COPD.

摘要

目的

医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的焦虑和抑郁状况;然而,其测量特性缺乏关键评估。我们旨在总结和批判性评估 HADS 在 COPD 中的有效性、可靠性和反应性。

材料和方法

检索了五个电子数据库。采用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)指南评估所选研究的方法学和证据质量。

结果

12 项研究评估了 HADS-总表及其子量表 HADS-焦虑和 HADS-抑郁在 COPD 中的心理测量特性。高质量证据支持 HADS-A 的结构和标准效度,HADS-T、HADS-A 和 HADS-D 的内部一致性具有 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.73-0.87,HADS-T 和子量表在治疗前后的反应性(最小临床重要差异=1.4-2;效应大小=0.45-1.40)。中等质量证据支持 HADS-A 和 HADS-D 的重测信度,优秀系数值为 0.86-0.90。

结论

推荐在稳定的 COPD 患者中使用 HADS-A。缺乏关于 HADS-D 和 HADS-T 有效性的高质量证据,无法就其在 COPD 中的临床实用性得出可靠结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验