Tao Yan-Xia, Wang Lan, Dong Xiao-Yan, Zheng Hong, Zheng Ya-Shu, Tang Xing-Yue, Zhao Yue, Zhang Qing
School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University.
Department of Respiratory Care, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Dec 22;12:105-114. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S120700. eCollection 2017.
For patients with COPD, physical activity (PA) is recommended as the core component of pulmonary rehabilitation, but there is lack of a validated questionnaire for assessing the PA effectively.
To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-C) in patients with COPD.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 167 outpatients aged 60 years or older with COPD. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's coefficient α, respectively. Validity was evaluated by correlation with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short (IPAQ-S), data of pedometer, Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale (SES6), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), grip strength, and disease characteristics.
The PASE-C had an excellent seven-day test-retest reliability (ICC=0.98) and an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.71). The content validity was supported by an item-content validity index, a scale-content validity index/universal agreement, and a scale-content validity index/average value of 0.70-1, 0.70, and 0.93, respectively. Concurrent validity was tested by correlation with IPAQ-S (=0.651). Criterion validity was confirmed by correlation with the walking steps (=0.611) and energy expenditure (=0.493). For construct validity, PASE-C had correlations with SES6 (=0.396), HADS for depression (=-0.234), seven subscales of SF-36 (=0.182-0.525), grip strength (=0.341), and disease characteristics including the duration of COPD (=-0.215), modified British Medical Research Council scale (=-0.354), forced expiratory volume in one second as percentage of predicted (=0.307), and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease grade (=-0.264), with a good construct validity (all <0.05).
The PASE-C has acceptable reliability and validity for patients aged 60 years or older with COPD, and it can be used as a valid tool to measure the PA of patients with COPD in the People's Republic of China.
对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者,身体活动(PA)被推荐为肺康复的核心组成部分,但缺乏一种经过验证的有效评估PA的问卷。
评估中文版老年人身体活动量表(PASE-C)在COPD患者中的信度和效度。
对167例年龄在60岁及以上的COPD门诊患者进行横断面研究。重测信度和内部一致性分别通过组内相关系数(ICC)和Cronbach's系数α计算。效度通过与国际身体活动问卷简表(IPAQ-S)、计步器数据、慢性病自我管理6项量表(SES6)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、医学结局研究36项简短健康调查(SF-36)、握力及疾病特征的相关性进行评估。
PASE-C具有出色的7天重测信度(ICC = 0.98)和可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach'sα = 0.71)。内容效度分别通过项目内容效度指数、量表内容效度指数/普遍认同度以及量表内容效度指数/平均值得到支持,其值分别为0.70 - 1、0.70和0.93。通过与IPAQ-S的相关性检验同时效度(= 0.651)。通过与步行步数(= 0.611)和能量消耗(= 0.493)的相关性确认效标效度。对于结构效度,PASE-C与SES6(= 0.396)、HADS抑郁量表(= - 0.234)、SF-36的7个分量表(= 0.182 - 0.525)、握力(= 0.341)以及疾病特征包括COPD病程(= - 0.215)、改良英国医学研究委员会量表(= - 0.354)、一秒用力呼气量占预计值百分比(= 0.307)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议分级(= - 0.264)具有相关性,结构效度良好(均<0.05)。
PASE-C对于60岁及以上的COPD患者具有可接受的信度和效度,可作为在中国测量COPD患者PA的有效工具。