Hu Shuang, Li Yitong, Hou Bowen, Zhang Yao, Liu Weiyin Vivian, Wu Gang, Li Xiaoming
Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1095, Jiefang Road, Wuhan City, 430030, Hubei Province, China.
MR Research, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Neuroradiology. 2023 May;65(5):969-977. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03130-z. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
This study compares the performance of a 4-min multi-echo in steady-state acquisition (MENSA) with a 6-min fast spin echo with variable flip angle (CUBE) protocol for the assessment of lumbosacral plexus nerve root lesions.
Seventy-two subjects underwent MENSA and CUBE sequences on a 3.0-T MRI scanner. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently assessed the images for quality and diagnostic capability. A qualitative assessment scoring system for image quality and quantitative nerve signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and iliac vein and muscle contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) was applied. Using surgical reports as the reference, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were evaluated. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and weighted kappa were used to calculate reliability.
MENSA image quality rating (3.679 ± 0.47) was higher than for CUBE images (3.038 ± 0.68), and MENSA showed higher mean nerve root SNR (36.935 ± 8.33 vs. 27.777 ± 7.41), iliac vein CNR (24.678 ± 6.63 vs. 5.210 ± 3.93), and muscle CNR (19.414 ± 6.07 vs. 13.531 ± 0.65) than CUBE (P < 0.05). Weighted kappa and ICC values indicated good reliability. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosis based on MENSA images were 96.23%, 89.47%, and 94.44%, respectively, and AUC was 0.929, compared with 92.45%, 84.21%, 90.28%, and 0.883 for CUBE images. The two correlated ROC curves were not significantly different. Weighted kappa values for intraobserver (0.758) and interobserver (0.768-0.818) reliability were substantial to perfect.
A time-efficient 4-min MENSA protocol exhibits superior image quality and high vascular contrast with the potential to produce high-resolution lumbosacral nerve root images.
本研究比较了用于评估腰骶丛神经根病变的4分钟稳态多回波采集(MENSA)与6分钟可变翻转角快速自旋回波(CUBE)协议的性能。
72名受试者在3.0-T磁共振成像扫描仪上接受了MENSA和CUBE序列检查。两名肌肉骨骼放射科医生独立评估图像的质量和诊断能力。应用了图像质量的定性评估评分系统以及定量神经信噪比(SNR)、髂静脉和肌肉对比噪声比(CNR)。以手术报告为参考,评估了敏感性、特异性、准确性和受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和加权kappa计算可靠性。
MENSA图像质量评分(3.679±0.47)高于CUBE图像(3.038±0.68),并且MENSA显示出比CUBE更高的平均神经根SNR(36.935±8.33对27.777±7.41)、髂静脉CNR(24.678±6.63对5.210±3.93)和肌肉CNR(19.414±6.07对13.531±0.65)(P<0.05)。加权kappa和ICC值表明可靠性良好。基于MENSA图像的诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为96.23%、89.47%和94.44%,AUC为0.929,而CUBE图像分别为92.45%、84.21%、90.28%和0.883。两条相关的ROC曲线无显著差异。观察者内(0.758)和观察者间(0.768 - 0.818)可靠性的加权kappa值为实质性到完美。
一种省时的4分钟MENSA协议具有卓越的图像质量和高血管对比度,有潜力生成高分辨率的腰骶神经根图像。