• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估标准与皮肤贴剂增强修复肩袖旋转肌的随机对照试验发现没有不良影响,并建议未来的试验需要至少 150 名患者。

A pilot randomised controlled trial assessing standard versus dermal patch-augmented rotator cuff repair found no adverse effects and suggest future trials need a minimum of 150 patients.

机构信息

Arthroscopy division, Department of Arthroscopy, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK B31 2AP, UK.

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2654-2661. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07356-5. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-023-07356-5
PMID:36862197
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) were to assess the safety and efficacy of a human dermal allograft patch and assess the feasibility of a future RCT comparing retear rate and functional outcome 12 months following standard and augmented double-row rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

A pilot RCT was conducted among patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tear measuring between 1 and 5 cm. They were randomised to either augmented (double-row repair with human acellular dermal patch) or standard (double-row repair only). The primary outcome was rotator cuff retear determined on MRI scan at 12 months using the Sugaya's classification (grade 4 or 5). All adverse events were recorded. Functional assessment was performed at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-surgery using clinical outcome scores. Safety was assessed by complications and adverse effects, and feasibility by recruitment, follow-up rate and proof of concept statistical analyses of a future trial.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2019, 63 patients were considered for inclusion. Twenty-three patients were excluded, leaving 40 patients (20 per group) in the final study population. The mean tear sizes were 3.0 cm in the augmented and 2.4 cm in the standard group. There was one adhesive capsulitis in the augmented group, with no other adverse events. Retear was observed in 4/18 (22%) of patients in the augmented and 5/18 (28%) in the standard group. In both groups, functional outcome improved significantly which was clinically meaningful for all scores, with no difference between groups. Retear rate increased with tear size. Future trials are feasible but need a minimum total sample size of 150 patients.

CONCLUSION

Clinically meaningful improved function without adverse effects was found with human acellular dermal patch-augmented cuff repairs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估人真皮同种异体移植物补片的安全性和有效性,并评估在标准和增强双排肩袖修复后 12 个月比较再撕裂率和功能结果的未来随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性。

方法

在接受关节镜肩袖撕裂修复的患者中进行了一项试点 RCT,肩袖撕裂的大小为 1 至 5cm。他们被随机分为增强组(双排修复+人脱细胞真皮补片)或标准组(仅双排修复)。主要结局是在 12 个月时通过 MRI 扫描根据 Sugaya 分类(4 或 5 级)确定肩袖再撕裂。记录所有不良事件。使用临床结果评分在基线和术后 3、6、9 和 12 个月进行功能评估。通过并发症和不良反应评估安全性,通过招募、随访率和未来试验的概念验证统计分析评估可行性。

结果

在 2017 年至 2019 年间,共有 63 名患者符合纳入标准。23 名患者被排除在外,最终研究人群为 40 名患者(每组 20 名)。增强组的平均撕裂大小为 3.0cm,标准组为 2.4cm。增强组有 1 例粘连性囊炎,无其他不良事件。增强组有 4/18(22%)的患者出现再撕裂,标准组有 5/18(28%)的患者出现再撕裂。两组患者的功能结果均显著改善,所有评分均具有临床意义,组间无差异。再撕裂率随撕裂大小增加而增加。未来的试验是可行的,但需要至少 150 名患者的总样本量。

结论

使用人脱细胞真皮补片增强的肩袖修复可实现无不良反应的临床意义上的功能改善。

证据水平

II 级。

相似文献

1
A pilot randomised controlled trial assessing standard versus dermal patch-augmented rotator cuff repair found no adverse effects and suggest future trials need a minimum of 150 patients.一项评估标准与皮肤贴剂增强修复肩袖旋转肌的随机对照试验发现没有不良影响,并建议未来的试验需要至少 150 名患者。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2654-2661. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07356-5. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
2
The Clinical Effect of a Rotator Cuff Retear: A Meta-analysis of Arthroscopic Single-Row and Double-Row Repairs.肩袖撕裂的临床效果:关节镜下单排和双排修复的Meta分析
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):733-741. doi: 10.1177/0363546516652900. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Clinical and Anatomical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Repair of Large Rotator Cuff Tears with Allograft Patch Augmentation: A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial with a Long-term Follow-up.关节镜下异体肌腱补片增强修复巨大肩袖撕裂的临床和解剖学结果:一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验,长期随访。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Jun;14(2):263-271. doi: 10.4055/cios21135. Epub 2022 May 13.
4
A prospective, randomized evaluation of acellular human dermal matrix augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.关节镜下修复肩袖撕裂中脱细胞异体真皮基质增强的前瞻性、随机评估。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.038. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
5
Healing and Functional Results of Dermal Allograft Augmentation of Complex and Revision Rotator Cuff Repairs.真皮移植物增强修复复杂和翻修肩袖撕裂的愈合和功能结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;49(8):2042-2047. doi: 10.1177/03635465211015194. Epub 2021 May 20.
6
Stump classification was correlated with retear in the suture-bridge and double-row repair techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.肩袖镜修补术中缝线桥和双排修复技术中残端分类与再撕裂相关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Aug;29(8):2587-2594. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06415-5. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
7
Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study.关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥技术治疗 55 岁以下肩袖撕裂患者的前瞻性对比研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):116-121. doi: 10.1177/0363546517728718. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Functional and structural outcomes of single-row versus double-row versus combined double-row and suture-bridge repair for rotator cuff tears.单排与双排与双排结合缝线桥接修复肩袖撕裂的功能和结构结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2091-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546511415660. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
9
Anteroposterior tear size, age, hospital, and case number are important predictors of repair integrity: an analysis of 1962 consecutive arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repairs.肩袖修补术的前-后撕裂大小、年龄、医院和病例数是修复完整性的重要预测指标:对 1962 例连续关节镜下单排肩袖修补术的分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Aug;30(8):1907-1914. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.038. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
10
Comparison of Structural Integrity and Functional Outcome Between Delaminated and Nondelaminated Rotator Cuff Tears After En Masse Arthroscopic Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching.全关节镜修复后层裂与非层裂肩袖撕裂的结构完整性和功能结果比较:倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1411-1419. doi: 10.1177/0363546519838257.

引用本文的文献

1
Rotator Cuff Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma Is Associated With Lower Retear Rates When Compared With Rotator Cuff Repair With Patch Augmentation: A Systematic Review.与使用补片增强的肩袖修复相比,富血小板血浆肩袖修复的再撕裂率更低:一项系统评价。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 30;13(7):23259671251358398. doi: 10.1177/23259671251358398. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Mapping the reporting practices in recent randomised controlled trials published in : A scoping review of methodological quality.对发表于……的近期随机对照试验报告做法的映射:方法学质量的范围综述
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jan 7;12(1):e70117. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70117. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Rotator Cuff Repair With Patch Augmentation: What Do We Know?使用补片增强修复肩袖:我们了解些什么?
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Oct;10(10):833-846. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.61345.3012.
2
Augmentation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Biologics and Grafts.关节镜下肩袖修复的增强:生物制剂和移植物。
Clin Sports Med. 2023 Jan;42(1):95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2022.08.010.
3
Inter-rater agreement of rotator cuff tendon and muscle magnetic resonance imaging parameters evaluated preoperatively and during the first postoperative year following rotator cuff repair.
The bioinductive collagen implant yields positive histological, clinical and MRI outcomes in the management of rotator cuff tears: A systematic review.
生物诱导性胶原蛋白植入物在肩袖撕裂治疗中产生了积极的组织学、临床和磁共振成像结果:一项系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Mar;33(3):1070-1090. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12429. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
Delamination of rotator cuff tears impairs healing after repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肩袖撕裂分层会损害修复后的愈合:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov;31(11):5255-5269. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07568-9. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
肩袖肌腱和肌肉磁共振成像参数的评估在肩袖修复术前和术后第一年的组内一致性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Dec;30(12):e741-e752. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.021. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
4
Use of implantable meshes for augmented rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用可植入网片增强修复肩袖撕裂:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e039552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039552.
5
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported shoulder outcomes.患者报告的肩部结局的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1484-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.033. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
Sample size estimation for stratified individual and cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.分层个体和群组随机试验二分类结局的样本量估计。
Stat Med. 2020 May 15;39(10):1489-1513. doi: 10.1002/sim.8492. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
7
Rotator Cuff Retears.肩袖撕裂。
JBJS Rev. 2020 Jan;8(1):e0039. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00039.
8
The Effect of Delayed Injection of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma Following Rotator Cuff Repair on Patient Function: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.富血小板纤维蛋白注射对肩袖修复术后患者功能恢复的影响:一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Mar;36(3):648-657. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.026. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
9
Adverse effects of xenogenic scaffolding in the context of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study for repairing full-thickness rotator cuff tears.异种支架在随机双盲安慰剂对照研究中修复全层肩袖撕裂的不良反应。
Trials. 2019 Jul 1;20(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3504-3.
10
No healing improvement after rotator cuff reconstruction augmented with an autologous periosteal flap.肩袖重建术后自体骨膜瓣增强无愈合改善。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Oct;27(10):3212-3221. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05384-8. Epub 2019 Apr 15.