• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过3种镍钛根管器械在不同根管类型中操作时的有限元模型对应力分布进行对比分析。

Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution through Finite-Element Models of 3 NiTi Endodontic Instruments while Operating in Different Canal Types.

作者信息

Gharechahi Maryam, Moezzi Shaghayegh, Karimpour Sahar

机构信息

Dept. of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Dentist, Private Practice, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Mar;24(1):60-65. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.90785.1522.

DOI:10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.90785.1522
PMID:36864995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9971613/
Abstract

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Distribution of stress along endodontic instruments determines their fracture resistance during instrumentation of root canals. The cross-sectional design of instruments and root canal anatomy are of the most important factors affecting the stress distribution.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution in different cross-sectional design of nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic instruments operating in different canal anatomies using finite element analysis (FEA).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

In this original finite element analysis study, 3-dimensional models of convex triangle (CT), S-type (S), and triple-helix (TH) cross-sectional designs with the size of 25/04 simulated rotational movements through 45ᵒ and 60ᵒ angled root canals with 2- and 5-mm radii using ABAQUS software. The stress distribution was evaluated by the means of FEA.

RESULTS

CT showed the lowest stress values followed by the TH and S ones. The most stress concentration was detected in the CT apical third while, TH revealed better stress distribution all along its length. 45ᵒ curvature angle and 5-mm radius applied the lowest stress to the instruments.

CONCLUSION

Higher value of radius and smaller curvature angle apply lower stress values to the instrument. CT design shows the lowest stress level with the most stress concentration in its apical third while the triple-helix design has a better stress distribution. Thus, it is safer to use convex triangular cross-section mostly for coronal and middle thirds in initial steps of shaping and triple-helix for the apical third in final steps.

摘要

问题陈述

根管治疗器械上应力的分布决定了它们在根管预备过程中的抗折断性。器械的横截面设计和根管解剖结构是影响应力分布的最重要因素。

目的

本研究的目的是使用有限元分析(FEA)评估在不同根管解剖结构中操作的不同横截面设计的镍钛(NiTi)根管治疗器械中的应力分布。

材料与方法

在这项原始的有限元分析研究中,使用ABAQUS软件对尺寸为25/04的凸三角形(CT)、S型(S)和三螺旋(TH)横截面设计的三维模型进行模拟,使其在半径为2毫米和5毫米的45°和60°成角根管中进行旋转运动。通过有限元分析评估应力分布。

结果

CT显示的应力值最低,其次是TH和S。在CT根尖三分之一处检测到最大应力集中,而TH在其整个长度上显示出更好的应力分布。45°曲率角和5毫米半径对器械施加的应力最低。

结论

较大的半径值和较小的曲率角对器械施加较低的应力值。CT设计显示应力水平最低,且在其根尖三分之一处应力集中最大,而三螺旋设计具有更好的应力分布。因此,在根管预备的初始步骤中,对于冠部和中部三分之一,大多使用凸三角形横截面更安全,而在最后步骤中,对于根尖三分之一则使用三螺旋更安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dff/9971613/2b8bd93fd3dd/JDS-24-60-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dff/9971613/26ede17a2f7b/JDS-24-60-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dff/9971613/eedaae7e3203/JDS-24-60-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dff/9971613/2b8bd93fd3dd/JDS-24-60-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dff/9971613/26ede17a2f7b/JDS-24-60-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dff/9971613/eedaae7e3203/JDS-24-60-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dff/9971613/2b8bd93fd3dd/JDS-24-60-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution through Finite-Element Models of 3 NiTi Endodontic Instruments while Operating in Different Canal Types.通过3种镍钛根管器械在不同根管类型中操作时的有限元模型对应力分布进行对比分析。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Mar;24(1):60-65. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.90785.1522.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Experimentally Designed Nickel-titanium Rotary Files with Varying Cross Sections: A Finite Element Analysis.不同横截面设计的镍钛旋转器械的应力分布比较研究:有限元分析。
J Endod. 2018 Apr;44(4):654-658. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.013. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
3
Dynamic analysis of a NiTi rotary file by using finite element analysis: Effect of cross-section and pitch length.使用有限元分析对镍钛旋转锉进行动态分析:横截面和螺距长度的影响。
Aust Endod J. 2024 Dec;50(3):649-657. doi: 10.1111/aej.12892. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
4
Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.不同横截面设计的镍钛器械在模拟弯曲根管预备过程中的力学响应
Int Endod J. 2009 Jul;42(7):593-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01553.x. Epub 2009 May 8.
5
Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture.镍钛旋转器械的设计与垂直根折之间的潜在关系。
J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
6
Effect of root canal treatment procedures with a novel rotary nickel titanium instrument (TRUShape) on stress in mandibular molars: a comparative finite element analysis.新型旋转镍钛器械(TRUShape)根管治疗程序对下颌磨牙应力的影响:一项对比性有限元分析
Odontology. 2017 Jan;105(1):54-61. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0232-y. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
Stress generation during self-adjusting file movement: minimally invasive instrumentation.自调式锉移动过程中的应力产生:微创器械操作
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1572-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.021. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
8
A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.镍钛热牙胶根管充填系统(NiTi-TEE)与K3旋转镍钛器械根管预备的对比研究
Int Endod J. 2006 Jan;39(1):71-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01059.x.
9
Comparative study of root-canal shaping with stainless steel and rotary NiTi files performed by preclinical dental students.牙科临床前学生使用不锈钢锉和旋转镍钛锉进行根管预备的对比研究。
Technol Health Care. 2015;23(3):257-65. doi: 10.3233/THC-150895.
10
Study on bending behaviour of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments by analytical and numerical analyses.通过分析和数值分析研究镍钛旋转根管器械的弯曲行为。
Int Endod J. 2013 Apr;46(4):379-88. doi: 10.1111/iej.12025. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Isolating design variables by assessing the impact of cross-section geometry on the mechanical performance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a comparative in vitro study.通过评估横截面几何形状对镍钛旋转器械机械性能的影响来分离设计变量:一项体外比较研究。
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;50(3):e28. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e28. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution Against the Root Canal Wall at Three Different Levels by Using TruNatomy, XP-endo Shaper, F360, and 2Shape Files-A Finite Element Analysis.使用 TruNatomy、XP-endo Shaper、F360 和 2Shape 文件对根管壁在三个不同水平的应力分布进行比较评估-有限元分析。
Eur Endod J. 2024 Aug 22;9(3):243-251. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.69672.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Experimentally Designed Nickel-titanium Rotary Files with Varying Cross Sections: A Finite Element Analysis.不同横截面设计的镍钛旋转器械的应力分布比较研究:有限元分析。
J Endod. 2018 Apr;44(4):654-658. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.013. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
2
Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance between ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels.ProTaper Next器械与ProTaper通用器械在不同水平下循环疲劳抗性的差异。
J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1477-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.025. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
3
Evaluation of the resistance to cyclic fatigue among ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and Vortex Blue rotary instruments.
Comparative evaluation of stress distribution against the root canal wall at three different levels using novel NiTi rotary files - A finite element analysis.
使用新型镍钛旋转锉对根管壁三个不同水平处的应力分布进行比较评估——有限元分析
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jan;27(1):62-67. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_96_23. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
ProTaper Next、ProTaper Universal和Vortex Blue旋转器械的循环疲劳抗性评估。
J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1190-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.033. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Evaluation of Forces Generated on Three Different Rotary File Systems in Apical Third of Root Canal using Finite Element Analysis.使用有限元分析评估三种不同旋转锉系统在根管根尖三分之一处产生的力
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jan;8(1):243-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7919.3903. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
5
Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries.不同螺距和横截面几何形状的镍钛旋转锉的弯曲刚度和应力。
J Endod. 2012 Oct;38(10):1399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
6
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different rotary nickel-titanium instruments designed for retreatment.三种不同设计用于再治疗的镍钛旋转器械的循环疲劳阻力比较。
J Endod. 2012 Jan;38(1):108-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
7
Comparative analysis of torsional and bending behavior through finite-element models of 5 Ni-Ti endodontic instruments.通过5种镍钛根管器械的有限元模型对扭转和弯曲行为进行对比分析。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jan;111(1):115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.07.017.
8
Infinite to finite: an overview of finite element analysis.从无限到有限:有限元分析综述
Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;21(3):425-32. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.70813.
9
Influence of cross-sectional design and dimension on mechanical behavior of nickel-titanium instruments under torsion and bending: a numerical analysis.横截面设计和尺寸对扭转和弯曲下镍钛器械力学行为的影响:数值分析。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1394-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
10
Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.不同横截面设计的镍钛器械在模拟弯曲根管预备过程中的力学响应
Int Endod J. 2009 Jul;42(7):593-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01553.x. Epub 2009 May 8.