Bensken Wyatt P, Fernandez Baca Vaca Guadalupe, Alberti Philip M, Khan Omar I, Ciesielski Timothy H, Jobst Barbara C, Williams Scott M, Stange Kurt C, Sajatovic Martha, Koroukian Siran M
Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences (WPB, THC, SMW, KCS, MS), School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Neurology (GFBV), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; AAMC Center for Health Justice (PMA), Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC; Epilepsy Center of Excellence (OIK), Baltimore VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, MD; Department of Neurology and Geisel School of Medicine (BCJ), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Center for Community Health Integration (KCS, MS), Department of Sociology, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland; and Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry (SMK), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, OH.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;13(1):e200101. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200101. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
Being on a newer, second-, and third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) may represent an important marker of quality of care for people with epilepsy. We sought to examine whether there were racial/ethnic differences in their use.
Using Medicaid claims data, we identified the type and number of ASMs, as well as the adherence, for people with epilepsy over a 5-year period (2010-2014). We used multilevel logistic regression models to examine the association between newer-generation ASMs and adherence. We then examined whether there were racial/ethnic differences in ASM use in models adjusted for demographics, utilization, year, and comorbidities.
Among 78,534 adults with epilepsy, 17,729 were Black, and 9,376 were Hispanic. Overall, 25.6% were on older ASMs, and being solely on second-generation ASMs during the study period was associated with better adherence (adjusted odds ratio: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.23). Those who saw a neurologist (3.26, 95% CI: 3.13-3.41) or who were newly diagnosed (1.29, 95% CI: 1.16-1.42) had higher odds of being on newer ASMs. Importantly, Black (0.71, 95% CI: 0.68-0.75), Hispanic (0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.99), and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Island individuals (0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.88) had lower odds of being on newer ASMs when compared with White individuals.
Generally, racial and ethnic minoritized people with epilepsy have lower odds of being on newer-generation ASMs. Greater adherence by people who were only on newer ASMs, their greater use among people seeing a neurologist, and the opportunity of a new diagnosis point to actionable leverage points for reducing inequities in epilepsy care.
使用更新的第二代和第三代抗癫痫药物(ASM)可能是癫痫患者护理质量的一个重要指标。我们试图研究其使用情况是否存在种族/民族差异。
利用医疗补助索赔数据,我们确定了癫痫患者在5年期间(2010 - 2014年)使用的ASM类型和数量以及依从性。我们使用多水平逻辑回归模型来研究新一代ASM与依从性之间的关联。然后,我们在针对人口统计学、利用率、年份和合并症进行调整的模型中,研究ASM使用情况是否存在种族/民族差异。
在78,534名成年癫痫患者中,17,729名是黑人,9,376名是西班牙裔。总体而言,25.6%的患者使用较老的ASM,在研究期间仅使用第二代ASM与更好的依从性相关(调整后的优势比:1.17,95%置信区间[CI]:1.11 - 1.23)。看过神经科医生的患者(3.26,95% CI:3.13 - 3.41)或新诊断的患者(1.29,95% CI:1.16 - 1.42)使用新一代ASM的几率更高。重要的是,与白人患者相比,黑人(0.71,95% CI:0.68 - 0.75)、西班牙裔(0.93,95% CI:0.88 - 0.99)以及夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民(0.77,95% CI:0.67 - 0.88)使用新一代ASM的几率较低。
一般来说,癫痫患者中的少数种族和民族使用新一代ASM的几率较低。仅使用新一代ASM的患者依从性更高,在看过神经科医生的患者中使用更为普遍,以及新诊断带来的机会,都指出了减少癫痫护理不平等的可采取行动的杠杆点。