• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童多发伤中激活标准的评估

Evaluation of activation criteria in paediatric multi-trauma.

作者信息

Cohen Neta, Davis Adrienne L, Test Gidon, Singer-Harel Dana, Pasternak Yehonatan, Beno Suzanne, Scolnik Dennis

机构信息

Division of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, SickKids, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Paediatrics, SickKids, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Oct 13;28(1):17-23. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac085. eCollection 2023 Feb.

DOI:10.1093/pch/pxac085
PMID:36865755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9971577/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the optimal set of trauma activation criteria predicting paediatric patients' need for acute care following multi-trauma, with particular attention to Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) cut-off value.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of paediatric multi-trauma patients aged 0 to 16 years, performed at a Level 1 paediatric trauma centre. Trauma activation criteria and GCS levels were examined with respect to patients' need for acute care, defined as: direct to operating room disposition, intensive care unit admission, need for acute interventions in the trauma room, or in-hospital death.

RESULTS

We enrolled 436 patients (median age 8.0 years). The following predicted need for acute care: GCS <14 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 23.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5 to 45.9, P < 0.001), hemodynamic instability: (aOR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.2-8.1, P = 0.01), open pneumothorax/flail chest (aOR: 20.0, 95% CI: 4.0 to 98.7, P < 0.001), spinal cord injury (aOR 15.4, 95% CI; 2.4 to 97.1, P = 0.003), blood transfusion at the referring hospital (aOR: 7.7, 95% CI: 1.3 to 44.2, P = 0.02) and GSW to the chest, abdomen, neck, or proximal extremities (aOR 11.0, 95% CI; 1.7 to 70.8, P = 0.01). Using these activation criteria would have decreased over- triage by 10.7%, from 49.1% to 37.2% and under-triage by 1.3%, from 4.7% to 3.5%, in our cohort of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Using GCS<14, hemodynamic instability, open pneumothorax/flail chest, spinal cord injury, blood transfusion at the referring hospital, and GSW to the chest, abdomen, neck of proximal extremities, as T1 activation criteria could decrease over- and under-triage rates. Prospective studies are needed to validate the optimal set of activation criteria in paediatric patients.

摘要

目的

探讨预测多发伤患儿急性护理需求的最佳创伤激活标准组合,尤其关注格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)的临界值。

方法

在一家一级儿科创伤中心对0至16岁的儿科多发伤患者进行回顾性队列研究。根据患者对急性护理的需求来检查创伤激活标准和GCS水平,急性护理需求定义为:直接进入手术室处置、入住重症监护病房、在创伤室需要急性干预或院内死亡。

结果

我们纳入了436例患者(中位年龄8.0岁)。以下因素可预测急性护理需求:GCS<14(调整优势比[aOR]23.0,95%置信区间[CI]:11.5至45.9,P<0.001)、血流动力学不稳定(aOR 3.7,95%CI:1.2 - 8.1,P = 0.01)、开放性气胸/连枷胸(aOR:20.0,95%CI:4.0至98.7,P<0.001)、脊髓损伤(aOR 15.4,95%CI;2.4至97.1,P = 0.003)、在转诊医院输血(aOR:7.7,95%CI:1.3至44.2,P = 0.02)以及胸部、腹部、颈部或近端肢体的枪伤(aOR 11.0,95%CI;1.7至70.8,P = 0.01)。在我们的患者队列中,使用这些激活标准可使过度分诊减少10.7%,从49.1%降至37.2%,使漏诊减少1.3%,从4.7%降至3.5%。

结论

将GCS<14、血流动力学不稳定、开放性气胸/连枷胸、脊髓损伤、在转诊医院输血以及胸部、腹部、颈部或近端肢体的枪伤作为T1激活标准可降低过度分诊和漏诊率。需要进行前瞻性研究以验证儿科患者最佳激活标准组合。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of activation criteria in paediatric multi-trauma.儿童多发伤中激活标准的评估
Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Oct 13;28(1):17-23. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac085. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Refining triage practices by predicting the need for emergent care following major trauma: the experience of a level 1 adult trauma center.通过预测重大创伤后紧急护理的需求来完善分诊实践:1 级成人创伤中心的经验。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1717-1725. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02195-4. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
3
Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department.急诊科创伤主治医生应对新创伤分诊规则的验证
J Trauma. 2002 Jun;52(6):1153-8; discussion 1158-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200206000-00022.
4
Evidence-based improvement of the National Trauma Triage Protocol: The Glasgow Coma Scale versus Glasgow Coma Scale motor subscale.基于证据的国家创伤分诊协议改进:格拉斯哥昏迷评分与格拉斯哥昏迷评分运动子量表。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jul;77(1):95-102; discussion 101-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000280.
5
Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.运用 META 方法对大量伤员事件进行院前分诊用于早期外科评估:医院创伤登记处的回顾性验证。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1040-6. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
6
Prognostication of traumatic brain injury outcomes in older trauma patients: A novel risk assessment tool based on initial cranial CT findings.老年创伤患者创伤性脑损伤预后的预测:一种基于初始头颅CT表现的新型风险评估工具。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jan-Mar;7(1):23-31. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_2_17.
7
Incremental benefit of individual American College of Surgeons trauma triage criteria.美国外科医师学会个体创伤分诊标准的增量效益。
Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Nov;3(11):992-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03340.x.
8
Predictive value of the Trauma Rating Index in Age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Respiratory rate and Systolic blood pressure score (TRIAGES) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) for the short-term mortality of patients with isolated traumatic brain injury.创伤评分指数(TRIAGES)中年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、呼吸频率和收缩压评分与修订创伤评分(RTS)对单纯性颅脑损伤患者短期死亡率的预测价值。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;71:175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.06.030. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
9
Evaluation of the criteria for trauma activation in the paediatric emergency department.评估儿科急诊创伤激活标准。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Sep;36(9):529-534. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207857. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
10
Predicting morbidity and mortality in Australian paediatric trauma with the Paediatric Age-Adjusted Shock Index and Glasgow Coma Scale.用儿童年龄调整休克指数和格拉斯哥昏迷评分预测澳大利亚儿科创伤的发病率和死亡率。
Injury. 2022 Apr;53(4):1438-1442. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.034. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Trauma and Trauma Team Activation in a Swiss Pediatric Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.瑞士儿科急诊科的儿科创伤与创伤团队启动:一项观察性队列研究
Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;10(8):1377. doi: 10.3390/children10081377.
2
Refining triage practices by predicting the need for emergent care following major trauma: the experience of a level 1 adult trauma center.通过预测重大创伤后紧急护理的需求来完善分诊实践:1 级成人创伤中心的经验。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1717-1725. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02195-4. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Early posttraumatic seizures in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis.小儿创伤性脑损伤后的早期创伤后癫痫发作:一项多中心分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021 Oct 29;29(2):225-231. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.PEDS21281. Print 2022 Feb 1.
2
Trauma Scores and Their Prognostic Value for the Outcome Following Pediatric Polytrauma.创伤评分及其对小儿多发伤预后的预测价值
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 3;9:721585. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.721585. eCollection 2021.
3
Addition of neurological status to pediatric adjusted shock index to predict early mortality in trauma: A pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program analysis.添加神经状态到儿科校正休克指数以预测创伤性早期死亡率:儿科创伤质量改进计划分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Oct 1;91(4):584-589. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003204.
4
Avoiding Cribari gridlock 2: The standardized triage assessment tool outperforms the Cribari matrix method in 38 adult and pediatric trauma centers.避免克里巴里僵局 2:标准化分诊评估工具在 38 家成人和儿科创伤中心的表现优于克里巴里矩阵方法。
Injury. 2021 Mar;52(3):443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Combining Cribari matrix and Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) to accurately assess undertriage in pediatric trauma.结合 Cribari 矩阵和创伤干预需求(NFTI)来准确评估儿科创伤中的分诊不足。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Aug;56(8):1401-1404. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
6
Modified Need for Trauma Intervention Criteria Reduces Cribari Trauma Overtriage Rate.改良创伤干预标准降低 Cribari 创伤过度分诊率。
J Trauma Nurs. 2020 Jul/Aug;27(4):195-199. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000514.
7
Pediatric trauma triage: A Pediatric Trauma Society Research Committee systematic review.儿科创伤分诊:儿科创伤学会研究委员会系统评价。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):623-630. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002713.
8
A Systematic Review of Hospital Trauma Team Activation Criteria for Children.儿童医院创伤团队启动标准的系统评价
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001256.
9
Asking a Better Question: Development and Evaluation of the Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) Metric as a Novel Indicator of Major Trauma.提出更好的问题:创伤干预需求(NFTI)指标作为重大创伤新指标的开发与评估
J Trauma Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;24(3):150-157. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000283.
10
The BIG Score and Prediction of Mortality in Pediatric Blunt Trauma.小儿钝性创伤的 BIG 评分与死亡率预测。
J Pediatr. 2015 Sep;167(3):593-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.041. Epub 2015 Jun 26.