• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童医院创伤团队启动标准的系统评价

A Systematic Review of Hospital Trauma Team Activation Criteria for Children.

作者信息

Drendel Amy L, Gray Matthew P, Lerner E Brooke

机构信息

From the Departments of Pediatrics and.

Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001256.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001256
PMID:30608908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6913171/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Hospital trauma activation criteria are intended to identify children who are likely to require aggressive resuscitation or specific surgical interventions that are time sensitive and require the resources of a trauma team at the bedside. Evidence to support criteria is limited, and no prior publication has provided historical or current perspectives on hospital practices toward informing best practice. This study aimed to describe the published variation in (1) highest level of hospital trauma team activation criteria for pediatric patients and (2) hospital trauma team membership and (3) compare these finding to the current ACS recommendations.

METHODS

Using an Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations search, any published description of hospital trauma team activation criteria for children that used information captured in the prehospital setting was identified. Only studies of children were included. If the study included both adults and children, it was included if the number of children assessed with the criteria was included.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies spanning 20 years and 13,184 children were included. Hospital trauma team activation and trauma team membership were variable. Nearly all (92%) of the trauma criteria used physiologic factors. Penetrating trauma (83%) was frequently included in the trauma team activation criteria. Mechanisms of injury (52%) were least likely to be included in the highest level of activation. No predictable pattern of criterion adoption was found. Only 2 of the published criteria and 1 of published trauma team membership are consistent with the current American College of Surgeons recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Published hospital trauma team activation criteria and trauma team membership for children were variable. Future prospective studies are needed to define the optimal hospital trauma team activation criteria and trauma team membership and assess its impact on improving outcomes for children.

摘要

目的

医院创伤启动标准旨在识别那些可能需要积极复苏或特定手术干预的儿童,这些干预对时间敏感,且需要床边创伤团队的资源。支持这些标准的证据有限,并且之前没有出版物提供关于医院实践以告知最佳实践的历史或当前观点。本研究旨在描述已发表的关于(1)儿科患者医院创伤团队启动标准的最高水平、(2)医院创伤团队成员构成的差异,并(3)将这些发现与美国外科医师学会(ACS)当前的建议进行比较。

方法

通过Ovid MEDLINE在研及其他未索引引文搜索,识别出任何已发表的使用院前环境中获取信息的儿童医院创伤团队启动标准描述。仅纳入儿童研究。如果研究同时包括成人和儿童,若包含使用该标准评估的儿童数量,则纳入该研究。

结果

纳入了跨越20年的18项研究,涉及13184名儿童。医院创伤团队启动和创伤团队成员构成各不相同。几乎所有(92%)的创伤标准都使用了生理因素。穿透性创伤(83%)经常被纳入创伤团队启动标准。损伤机制(52%)最不可能被纳入最高启动水平。未发现标准采用的可预测模式。已发表的标准中只有2项以及已发表的创伤团队成员构成中只有1项与美国外科医师学会当前的建议一致。

结论

已发表的儿童医院创伤团队启动标准和创伤团队成员构成各不相同。未来需要进行前瞻性研究,以确定最佳的医院创伤团队启动标准和创伤团队成员构成,并评估其对改善儿童结局的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe5/6913171/d44f45ce7052/nihms-1060812-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe5/6913171/7660a9b4f598/nihms-1060812-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe5/6913171/d44f45ce7052/nihms-1060812-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe5/6913171/7660a9b4f598/nihms-1060812-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe5/6913171/d44f45ce7052/nihms-1060812-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review of Hospital Trauma Team Activation Criteria for Children.儿童医院创伤团队启动标准的系统评价
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001256.
2
Evaluation of the criteria for trauma activation in the paediatric emergency department.评估儿科急诊创伤激活标准。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Sep;36(9):529-534. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207857. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
3
Using a multidisciplinary and evidence-based approach to decrease undertriage and overtriage of pediatric trauma patients.采用多学科且基于证据的方法,以减少儿科创伤患者的分诊不足和过度分诊情况。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Sep;51(9):1518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
4
Mode of Transport and Trauma Activation Status in Admitted Pediatric Trauma Patients.入院创伤患儿的交通方式与创伤激活状态。
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
5
Multidisciplinary approach to decrease pediatric trauma undertriage.采用多学科方法减少儿科创伤分诊不足。
J Surg Res. 2016 Oct;205(2):482-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.054. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
Noncompliance with American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recommended criteria for full trauma team activation is associated with undertriage deaths.不符合美国外科医师学会创伤委员会推荐的充分创伤小组激活标准与分诊不足死亡有关。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Feb;84(2):287-294. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001745.
7
Trauma team activation criteria as predictors of patient disposition from the emergency department.作为急诊科患者处置预测指标的创伤团队启动标准。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb01364.x.
8
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.《伤员现场分类指南:国家现场分类专家小组 2011 年的建议》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Jan 13;61(RR-1):1-20.
9
Evaluation of Highest Level Pediatric Trauma Activation Criteria.最高级别儿科创伤启动标准的评估
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Nov;34(11):787-790. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001178.
10
Association Between Prearrival Notification Time and Advanced Trauma Life Support Protocol Adherence.到达前通知时间与高级创伤生命支持方案遵守情况的关系。
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric trauma over a decade: demographics, mechanisms of injury, and mortality at a major Danish trauma center-a retrospective cohort study.十年间的儿童创伤:丹麦一家主要创伤中心的人口统计学、损伤机制及死亡率——一项回顾性队列研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 10;33(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01348-9.
2
Age-related mortality risk in cycling trauma: analysis of the National Trauma Databank 2017-2023.自行车创伤中与年龄相关的死亡风险:2017 - 2023年国家创伤数据库分析
Inj Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 24;12(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40621-024-00558-6.
3
Comparison of nine trauma scoring systems in prediction of inhospital outcomes of pediatric trauma patients: a multicenter study.

本文引用的文献

1
A consensus-based criterion standard definition for pediatric patients who needed the highest-level trauma team activation.一个基于共识的标准定义,用于确定需要最高级别创伤团队激活的儿科患者。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Mar;78(3):634-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000543.
2
Do prehospital criteria optimally assign injured children to the appropriate level of trauma team activation and emergency department disposition at a level I pediatric trauma center?在一级儿科创伤中心,院前标准能否将受伤儿童最佳地分配到适当级别的创伤团队启动和急诊科处置中?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Nov;30(11):1097-102. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3587-6. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
3
比较九种创伤评分系统在预测儿科创伤患者住院结局中的作用:一项多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 1;14(1):7646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58373-4.
4
Comparison of Vital Sign Cutoffs to Identify Children With Major Trauma.比较生命体征临界值以识别有重大创伤的儿童。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356472. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56472.
5
Computer Simulation to Assess Emergency Department Length of Stay in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.计算机模拟评估小儿创伤性脑损伤患者在急诊科的住院时间
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Jun 1;40(6):421-425. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003088. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
6
Pediatric Trauma and Trauma Team Activation in a Swiss Pediatric Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.瑞士儿科急诊科的儿科创伤与创伤团队启动:一项观察性队列研究
Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;10(8):1377. doi: 10.3390/children10081377.
7
Evaluation of activation criteria in paediatric multi-trauma.儿童多发伤中激活标准的评估
Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Oct 13;28(1):17-23. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac085. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Critically Ill Children in a Swiss Pediatric Emergency Department With an Interdisciplinary Approach: A Prospective Cohort Study.瑞士儿科急诊科采用跨学科方法治疗危重症儿童:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Oct 11;9:721646. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.721646. eCollection 2021.
9
Machine learning for outcome predictions of patients with trauma during emergency department care.机器学习在急诊科患者创伤预后预测中的应用。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100407.
10
ISS alone, is not sufficient to correctly assign patients post hoc to trauma team requirement.ISS 单独使用不足以正确地将患者事后分配到创伤小组的需求。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb;48(1):383-392. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01410-4. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
Restraint status improves the predictive value of motor vehicle crash criteria for pediatric trauma team activation.
约束状态提高了机动车碰撞标准对儿科创伤小组激活的预测价值。
Am J Surg. 2012 Dec;204(6):933-7; discussion 937-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.017.
4
Efficacy of anatomic and physiologic indicators versus mechanism of injury criteria for trauma activation in pediatric emergencies.解剖生理指标与创伤机制损伤标准在儿科急诊创伤激活中的疗效比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1471-7; discussion 1477. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782789.
5
A multicenter prospective analysis of pediatric trauma activation criteria routinely used in addition to the six criteria of the American College of Surgeons.一项多中心前瞻性分析,研究除美国外科医师学院的六项标准外,常规使用的儿科创伤激活标准。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):377-84; discussion 384. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318259ca84.
6
Trauma activation: are we making the right call? A 3-year experience at a Level I pediatric trauma center.创伤激活:我们做对了吗?一家一级儿科创伤中心的 3 年经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Oct;46(10):1985-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.06.001.
7
Physiologically focused triage criteria improve utilization of pediatric surgeon-directed trauma teams and reduce costs.以生理学为重点的分诊标准可提高儿科外科医生主导的创伤小组的利用率并降低成本。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jun;45(6):1315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.108.
8
Reducing "cry wolf"--changing trauma team activation at a pediatric trauma centre.减少“狼来了”现象——改变儿科创伤中心的创伤团队启动机制
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):698-702. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318165b2f7.
9
External validation and modification of a pediatric trauma triage tool.儿科创伤分诊工具的外部验证与修正
J Trauma. 2007 Mar;62(3):606-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802ee56f.
10
Do the American College of Surgeons' "major resuscitation" trauma triage criteria predict emergency operative management?美国外科医师学会的“重大复苏”创伤分诊标准能否预测急诊手术治疗?
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jul;50(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 1.