Hollings Matthew, Mavros Yorgi, Freeston Jonathan, Fiatarone Singh Maria
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023 Feb 27;9(1):e001468. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001468. eCollection 2023.
The efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patient outcomes is well established, with better outcomes when delivery meets recommended guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess how well Australian practice aligns with national CR guidelines for exercise assessment and prescription.
This cross-sectional online survey was distributed to all 475 publicly listed CR services in Australia and consisted of four sections: (1) Programme and client demographics, (2) aerobic exercise characteristics, (3) resistance exercise characteristics and (4) pre-exercise assessment, exercise testing and progression.
In total, 228 (54%) survey responses were received. Only three of five Australian guideline recommendations were consistently reported to be followed in current CR programmes: assessment of physical function prior to exercise (91%), prescription of light-moderate exercise intensity (76%) and review of referring physician results (75%). Remaining guidelines were commonly not implemented. For example, only 58% of services reported an initial assessment of resting ECG/heart rate, and only 58% reported the concurrent prescription of both aerobic and resistance exercise, which may have been influenced by equipment availability (p<0.05). Exercise-specific assessments such as muscular strength (18%) and aerobic fitness (13%) were uncommonly reported, although both were more frequent in metropolitan services (p<0.05) or when an exercise physiologist was present (p<0.05).
Clinically relevant deficits in national CR guideline implementation are common, potentially influenced by location, exercise supervisor and equipment availability. Key deficiencies include the lack of concurrent aerobic and resistance exercise prescription and infrequent assessment of important physiological outcomes including resting heart rate, muscular strength and aerobic fitness.
基于运动的心脏康复(CR)对患者预后的疗效已得到充分证实,若实施符合推荐指南,则预后更佳。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚的实践与国家CR运动评估和处方指南的契合程度。
这项横断面在线调查面向澳大利亚所有475家公开上市的CR服务机构展开,共包含四个部分:(1)项目和客户人口统计学信息,(2)有氧运动特征,(3)抗阻运动特征,以及(4)运动前评估、运动测试和进展情况。
共收到228份(54%)调查回复。在当前的CR项目中,澳大利亚指南的五项建议中只有三项被一致报告得到遵循:运动前进行身体功能评估(91%)、规定轻度至中度运动强度(76%)以及复查转诊医生的检查结果(75%)。其余指南通常未得到实施。例如,只有58%的服务机构报告进行了静息心电图/心率的初始评估,只有58%的机构报告同时开具了有氧运动和抗阻运动处方,这可能受到设备可用性的影响(p<0.05)。诸如肌肉力量(18%)和有氧适能(13%)等特定运动评估很少被报告,不过在大都市的服务机构中(p<0.05)或有运动生理学家在场时(p<0.05),这两项评估更为频繁。
国家CR指南实施中存在与临床相关的不足很常见,可能受到地点、运动主管和设备可用性的影响。主要不足包括缺乏同时开具有氧运动和抗阻运动处方,以及对包括静息心率、肌肉力量和有氧适能在内的重要生理指标评估不频繁。