• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术联合最大限度保留尿道长度技术可保留阴茎长度。

Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with maximal urethral length preservation technique preserves penile length.

机构信息

Larkin Health System, Miami, FL, USA.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1525-1530. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01548-4. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-023-01548-4
PMID:36867324
Abstract

Penile shortening is a recognized but neglected side effect of prostate cancer treatment. In this study we explore the effect of maximal urethral length preservation (MULP) technique on penile length preservation after robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). In an IRB approved study, we prospectively evaluated the stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) pre and post RALP in subjects with a diagnosis of prostate cancer. The multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) was utilized for surgical planning if available preoperatively. Repeated measures t-test, linear regression and 2-way ANOVA analyses were performed. A total of 35 subjects underwent RALP. Mean age was 65.8 yr (SD: 5.9), preoperative SFPL was 15.57 cm (SD: 1.66) and postoperative SFPL was 15.41 cm (SD: 1.61) p = 0.68. No change in the postoperative SFPL was recorded among 27 subjects (77.1%) while 5 subjects (14.3%) had 0.5 cm shortening, and 3 subjects (8.6%) had 1 cm shortening. Pathologic stage, preoperative MP-MRI and body mass index (BMI) were significant predictors of postoperative SFPL on linear regression analysis, p = 0.001. Among 26 subjects with pathologic stage 2 disease, no statistical difference was seen in repeated measures t-test between pre and postoperative SFPL, 15.36 vs 15.3 cm, p = 0.08. All subjects were continent by 6 months postoperatively, with no complications. We demonstrate that incorporating MULP technique and preoperative MP-MRI preserves SFPL in subjects undergoing a RALP.

摘要

阴茎缩短是前列腺癌治疗中一种公认但被忽视的副作用。在这项研究中,我们探讨了最大尿道长度保留(MULP)技术对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)后阴茎长度保留的影响。在一项经过机构审查委员会批准的研究中,我们前瞻性评估了诊断为前列腺癌的患者 RALP 前后的伸展松弛阴茎长度(SFPL)。如果术前有条件,使用多参数 MRI(MP-MRI)进行手术规划。进行重复测量 t 检验、线性回归和 2 路方差分析。共有 35 名患者接受了 RALP。平均年龄为 65.8 岁(标准差:5.9),术前 SFPL 为 15.57cm(标准差:1.66),术后 SFPL 为 15.41cm(标准差:1.61),p=0.68。27 名患者(77.1%)术后 SFPL 无变化,5 名患者(14.3%)缩短 0.5cm,3 名患者(8.6%)缩短 1cm。线性回归分析显示,术后 SFPL 的病理分期、术前 MP-MRI 和体重指数(BMI)是显著预测因素,p=0.001。在 26 名病理分期为 2 期的患者中,重复测量 t 检验显示术前和术后 SFPL 无统计学差异,分别为 15.36cm 和 15.3cm,p=0.08。所有患者术后 6 个月均保持控尿,无并发症。我们证明,在接受 RALP 的患者中,采用 MULP 技术和术前 MP-MRI 可保留 SFPL。

相似文献

1
Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with maximal urethral length preservation technique preserves penile length.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术联合最大限度保留尿道长度技术可保留阴茎长度。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1525-1530. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01548-4. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
2
Early return of continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using modified maximal urethral length preservation technique.改良最大尿道长度保留技术行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后患者早期控尿恢复。
J Endourol. 2014 Aug;28(8):930-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0794. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
3
Prospective analysis of penile length changes after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后阴茎长度变化的前瞻性分析。
BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5b):E131-6. doi: 10.1111/bju.12443. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.前列腺尖部形态变异对根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性率的影响:机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的比较
J Endourol. 2018 Jan;32(1):46-53. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0693. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Modified Apical Dissection and Lateral Prostatic Fascia Preservation Improves Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Propensity Score-matched Analysis.改良尖部解剖和侧方前列腺筋膜保留术提高机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后早期功能恢复:倾向评分匹配分析结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Dec;78(6):875-884. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的手术结果基准:健康专业人员随访研究的结果
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.039. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
7
Appropriate preoperative membranous urethral length predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.术前适当的膜尿道长度可预测机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后尿控的恢复情况。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 16;16(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1523-2.
8
Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.微创根治性前列腺切除术:从单纯腹腔镜手术向机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的转变。
Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):823-9.
9
Current Management of pT3b Prostate Cancer After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后 pT3b 前列腺癌的当前治疗方法。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Feb;2(1):110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 27.
10
Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis.经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后行根治性前列腺切除术:机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的配对分析。
J Endourol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1136-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0074. Epub 2012 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of a Novel Penile Traction Device in Improving Penile Length and Erectile Function Post Prostatectomy: Results from a Single-Center Randomized, Controlled Trial.新型阴茎牵引装置在改善前列腺切除术后阴茎长度和勃起功能方面的疗效:单中心随机对照试验的结果。
J Urol. 2021 Aug;206(2):416-426. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001792. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
2
Urethral realignment with maximal urethral length and bladder neck preservation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Urinary continence recovery.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保持最大尿道长度和膀胱颈以进行尿道重排:尿控恢复。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0227744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227744. eCollection 2020.
3
Posterior, Anterior, and Periurethral Surgical Reconstruction of Urinary Continence Mechanisms in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Description and Video Compilation of Commonly Performed Surgical Techniques.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中尿控机制的后、前和尿道周围外科重建:常用手术技术的描述和视频汇编。
Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):814-822. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
4
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) aberrations in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.肌层浸润性尿路上皮癌中的成纤维细胞生长因子受体3(FGFR3)畸变
BMC Urol. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0380-1.
5
Changes in penile length after radical prostatectomy: effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy.根治性前列腺切除术后阴茎长度的变化:新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的影响。
Andrology. 2018 Nov;6(6):903-908. doi: 10.1111/andr.12517. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
Changes in penile length after radical prostatectomy: investigation of the underlying anatomical mechanism.根治性前列腺切除术后阴茎长度的变化:潜在解剖学机制的研究
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):293-299. doi: 10.1111/bju.13777. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
7
Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis.磁共振成像在前列腺癌局部分期中的准确性:一项诊断荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
8
Effect of Tadalafil Once Daily on Penile Length Loss and Morning Erections in Patients After Bilateral Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.他达拉非每日一次对双侧保留神经根治性前列腺切除术后患者阴茎长度缩短和晨勃的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果
Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1090-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.058. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
9
Early return of continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using modified maximal urethral length preservation technique.改良最大尿道长度保留技术行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后患者早期控尿恢复。
J Endourol. 2014 Aug;28(8):930-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0794. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
10
Neglected side effects after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.根治性前列腺切除术的被忽视副作用:系统评价。
J Sex Med. 2014 Feb;11(2):374-85. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12403. Epub 2013 Nov 25.