Suppr超能文献

在模拟创伤气道和快速序贯诱导插管条件下,Airtraq、McGrath 视频喉镜和 Macintosh 插管条件的比较。

Comparison of Intubation Conditions Between Airtraq, McGrath Video Laryngoscopes, and Macintosh Under Conditions of Simulated Trauma Airway and Rapid Sequence Induction Intubation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;64(3):271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients arriving at the emergency department with a potential cervical spine injury and immobilized in a rigid cervical collar often require emergency airway management and rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII). There have been several advances in airway management with the advent of channeled (Airtraq; Prodol Meditec) and nonchanneled (McGrath; Meditronics) video laryngoscopes, which enable intubation without the removal of the cervical collar, but their efficacy and superiority over conventional laryngoscopy (Macintosh) in the presence of a rigid cervical collar and cricoid pressure have not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare the channeled (Airtraq [group A]) and nonchanneled (McGrath [Group M]) video laryngoscopes with a conventional laryngoscope (Macintosh [Group C]) in a simulated trauma airway.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary care center. Participants were 300 patients requiring general anesthesia (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II), of both sexes, and aged 18-60 years. Airway management was simulated without removal of a rigid cervical collar and using cricoid pressure during intubation. After RSI, patients were intubated with one of the study techniques according to randomization. Intubation time and intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score were noted.

RESULTS

Mean intubation time was 42.2 s in group C, 35.7 s in group M, and 21.8 s in group A (p = 0.001). Intubation was easy in group M and group A (median IDS score of 0; interquartile range [IQR] 0-1 for group M and median IDS score of 1; IQR 0-2 for group A and group C; p < 0.001). A higher proportion (95.1%) of patients had an IDS score of < 1 in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of RSII with cricoid pressure in the presence of a cervical collar was easier and more rapid with channeled video laryngoscope than with other techniques.

摘要

背景

在急诊科,对于可能存在颈椎损伤且已使用硬性颈椎固定器固定的患者,常需要进行紧急气道管理和快速序贯诱导插管(RSII)。随着通道式(Airtraq;Prodol Meditec)和非通道式(McGrath;Meditronics)视频喉镜的出现,气道管理技术得到了几项进展,这些喉镜可在不拆除颈椎固定器的情况下进行插管,但在存在硬性颈椎固定器和环状软骨施压的情况下,其与传统喉镜(Macintosh)相比,在插管效果和优越性方面尚未得到评估。

目的

本研究旨在比较通道式(Airtraq [A 组])和非通道式(McGrath [M 组])视频喉镜与传统喉镜(Macintosh [C 组])在模拟创伤气道中的应用。

方法

在一家三级护理中心进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究。纳入的参与者为需要全身麻醉(美国麻醉医师协会 [ASA] 分级 I 或 II)的 300 名 18-60 岁的男女患者。在不拆除硬性颈椎固定器且进行环状软骨施压的情况下模拟进行气道管理。RSII 后,根据随机分组,使用研究技术之一对患者进行插管。记录插管时间和插管难度评分(IDS)。

结果

C 组的平均插管时间为 42.2s,M 组为 35.7s,A 组为 21.8s(p=0.001)。M 组和 A 组的插管较容易(M 组的中位数 IDS 评分为 0;四分位距 [IQR] 0-1,A 组的中位数 IDS 评分为 1;IQR 0-2,C 组;p<0.001)。A 组中,IDS 评分<1 的患者比例更高(95.1%)。

结论

在存在颈椎固定器的情况下使用环状软骨施压进行 RSII 时,与其他技术相比,使用通道式视频喉镜进行操作更容易且更快。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验