Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 31;59(2):282. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020282.
: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients' morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the McGRATH video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation compared with that of conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway scenarios. : In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were assigned to the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 50) or McGRATH video laryngoscope (n = 45) groups. In this study, to create a simulated difficult airway condition, the subjects performed manual in-line stabilization and applied a soft cervical collar. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation within 30 s. The time required for an intubation, glottis grade, intubation difficulty scale (IDS score), the subjective ease of intubation, and optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OLEM) were evaluated. In addition, complications caused by each blade were investigated. : The intubation success rate within 30 s was not significantly different between the two groups (44 (88.0%) vs. 36 (80.0%), = 0.286). The glottic grade was better in the McGRATH group than in the Macintosh group ( = 0.029), but neither the intubation time (26.3 ± 8.2 s vs. 24.2 ± 5.0 s, = 0.134) nor the rates of oral bleeding (2 (4.0%) vs. 0 (0.0%)) and tooth injury (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (2.2%)) were significantly different between the two groups. : The use of the McGRATH video laryngoscope did not improve the intubation success rate or shorten the intubation time. However, the McGRATH video laryngoscope provided a better glottis view than the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway.
困难气道插管在麻醉中可能会意外遇到,这会增加患者的发病率和死亡率。麦格(McGRATH)视频喉镜在困难或正常气道患者中提供了更好的喉部可视性。本研究旨在评估麦格(McGRATH)视频喉镜与传统的麦克intosh 喉镜在模拟困难气道情况下经口气管插管的效果。
在这项随机对照试验中,需要全身麻醉下经口气管插管的手术患者被分配到麦克intosh 喉镜(n = 50)或麦格(McGRATH)视频喉镜(n = 45)组。在这项研究中,为了创建模拟困难气道条件,受测者进行了手动直线稳定,并应用了软颈圈。主要结局是 30 秒内插管成功的比例。评估了插管时间、声门分级、插管难度评分(IDS 评分)、插管主观容易程度和最佳外部喉部操作(OLEM)以及每个叶片引起的并发症。
在 30 秒内插管成功率在两组之间没有显著差异(44(88.0%)vs. 36(80.0%),= 0.286)。麦格组的声门分级优于麦克intosh 组(= 0.029),但插管时间(26.3 ± 8.2 s vs. 24.2 ± 5.0 s,= 0.134)和口腔出血(2(4.0%)vs. 0(0.0%))和牙齿损伤(0(0.0%)vs. 1(2.2%))的发生率在两组之间没有显著差异。
使用麦格(McGRATH)视频喉镜并没有提高插管成功率或缩短插管时间。然而,在模拟困难气道患者中,麦格(McGRATH)视频喉镜比传统的麦克intosh 喉镜提供了更好的声门视野。