Suppr超能文献

诺司卡品-甘草组合对新冠门诊患者止咳效果的评估:一项随机对照试验。

Evaluation of noscapine-licorice combination effects on cough relieving in COVID-19 outpatients: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Barati Saghar, Feizabadi Faezeh, Khalaj Hakimeh, Sheikhzadeh Hakimeh, Jamaati Hamid R, Farajidavar Hirad, Dastan Farzaneh

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Alborz, Iran.

National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Alborz, Iran.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 17;14:1102940. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1102940. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

As February 2023, SARS-CoV-2 is still infecting people and children worldwide. Cough and dyspnea are annoying symptoms almost present in a large proportion of COVID-19 outpatients, and the duration of these symptoms might be long enough to affect the patients' quality of life. Studies have shown positive effects for noscapine plus licorice in the previous COVID-19 trials. This study aimed to assess the effects of the combination of noscapine and licorice-for relieving cough in outpatients with COVID-19. This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 124 patients at the Dr. Masih Daneshvari Hospital. Participants over 18 years of age with confirmed COVID-19 and cough were allowed to enter the study if the onset of symptoms was less than 5 days. The primary outcome was to assess the response to treatment over 5 days using the visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of cough severity after 5 days using Cough Symptom Score, as well as the cough-related quality of life and dyspnea relieving. Patients in the noscapine plus licorice group received Noscough syrup 20 mL every 6 h for 5 days. The control group received diphenhydramine elixir 7 mL every 8 h. By day five, 53 (85.48%) patients in the Noscough group and 49 (79.03%) patients in the diphenhydramine group had response to treatment. This difference was not statistically significant (-value = 0.34). The presence of dyspnea was significantly lower in the Noscough group diphenhydramine at day five (1.61% in the Noscough group vs. 12.9% in the diphenhydramine group; -value = 0.03). The cough-related quality of life and severity also significantly favored Noscough syrup (-values <0.001). Noscapine plus licorice syrup was slightly superior to diphenhydramine in relieving cough symptoms and dyspnea in the COVID-19 outpatients. The severity of cough and cough-related quality of life were also significantly better in the noscapine plus licorice syrup. Noscapine plus licorice may be a valuable treatment in relieving cough in COVID-19 outpatients.

摘要

截至2023年2月,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)仍在全球感染着人们和儿童。咳嗽和呼吸困难是几乎在很大一部分新冠门诊患者中都会出现的恼人症状,而且这些症状的持续时间可能长到足以影响患者的生活质量。研究表明,在之前的新冠试验中,那可丁加甘草有积极效果。本研究旨在评估那可丁与甘草联合使用对新冠门诊患者止咳的效果。这项随机对照试验在马西·达内什瓦里医生医院对124名患者进行。年龄在18岁以上、确诊感染新冠且有咳嗽症状、症状出现时间少于5天的参与者被允许进入该研究。主要结局是使用视觉模拟量表评估5天内的治疗反应。次要结局包括使用咳嗽症状评分评估5天后的咳嗽严重程度,以及与咳嗽相关的生活质量和呼吸困难缓解情况。那可丁加甘草组的患者每6小时服用20毫升诺思咳嗽糖浆,共服用5天。对照组每8小时服用7毫升苯海拉明酏剂。到第5天,诺思咳嗽组有53名(85.48%)患者对治疗有反应,苯海拉明组有49名(79.03%)患者对治疗有反应。这种差异无统计学意义(P值 = 0.34)。在第5天,诺思咳嗽组的呼吸困难发生率明显低于苯海拉明组(诺思咳嗽组为1.61%,苯海拉明组为12.9%;P值 = 0.03)。与咳嗽相关的生活质量和严重程度也明显有利于诺思咳嗽糖浆(P值 <0.001)。在缓解新冠门诊患者的咳嗽症状和呼吸困难方面,那可丁加甘草糖浆略优于苯海拉明。那可丁加甘草糖浆在咳嗽严重程度和与咳嗽相关的生活质量方面也明显更好。那可丁加甘草可能是缓解新冠门诊患者咳嗽的一种有价值的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7237/9981666/4eb3b6980046/fphar-14-1102940-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验