de Leon Fernanda L Lopez, Malde Bansi, McQuillin Ben
School of Economics, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
School of Economics, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom and Institute of Fiscal Studies, London, United Kingdom.
J Econ Behav Organ. 2023 Apr;208:140-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
This paper examines the impacts of emergency cash-transfers on individuals' social distancing behaviour and beliefs about COVID-19. We focus on the impacts of "Auxilio Emergencial" (AE): a large-scale cash-transfer in Brazil targeting low-income individuals who were unemployed or informally employed during the pandemic. To identify causal effects we exploit exogenous variation, arising from the AE design, in individuals' access to the cash-transfer programme. Using data from an online survey, our results suggest that eligibility to the emergency cash transfer led to a reduced likelihood of individuals contracting COVID-19, likely to have been driven by a reduction in working hours. Moreover, the cash transfer seems to have increased perceptions about the seriousness of coronavirus, while also exacerbating misconceptions about the pandemic. These findings indicate effects of emergency cash-transfers in determining individuals' narratives about a pandemic, in enabling social distancing and potentially in reducing the spread of the disease.
本文考察了紧急现金转移对个人社交距离行为以及对新冠疫情看法的影响。我们聚焦于“紧急援助”(AE)的影响:这是巴西一项大规模现金转移计划,目标是在疫情期间失业或从事非正规工作的低收入个人。为识别因果效应,我们利用了因AE设计导致的个人获得现金转移计划机会的外生变化。基于一项在线调查数据,我们的结果表明,有资格获得紧急现金转移使个人感染新冠病毒的可能性降低,这可能是工作时长减少所致。此外,现金转移似乎增强了对新冠病毒严重性的认知,同时也加剧了对疫情的误解。这些发现表明紧急现金转移在决定个人对疫情的描述、促成社交距离以及可能减少疾病传播方面的作用。