IDinsight Inc, San Francisco, California, USA.
Social Science Research Council, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007747.
In this paper, we estimate the impact after 4-8 months of a large one-off unconditional cash transfer delivered to refugees during a time of dual shocks: the COVID-19 pandemic and cuts to monthly aid. We focus on four key outcomes: (1) health-seeking behaviour; (2) COVID-19 specific preventive health practices; (3) food security and (4) psychological well-being.
We use both quantitative and qualitative data to understand the impact of a cash transfer in this context. Quantitatively, we use a baseline survey of 1200 households (Q4 2019) and follow-up with three rounds of phone surveys in Q2 and Q3 2021, capturing at least half the sample in each round. We exploit an experimental variation in the timing of the cash transfer to assess the effect of the cash transfer through ordinary least squares regressions of intention to treat. Controlling for key baseline characteristics, we analyse the effect of the cash transfer on health access, COVID-19 health practices, food security and psychological well-being. Qualitatively, we make use of a longitudinal, small-n sample of refugee respondents, each of whom we interviewed up to 15 times between February and September 2020 to understand change over time and to go deeper into key topics.
We do not find a statistically significant effect (6.2%, p=0.188) of receiving the cash transfer on preventative measures against COVID-19. However, households receiving the cash transfer were more food secure, with a 14.4% (p=0.011) improvement on the food security index, have better psychological well-being (24.5%, p=0.003) and are more likely to seek healthcare in the private health facilities (10.4%, p=0.057) as compared with control households. We do not find significant results on the value of food consumption. Overall, we find stronger treatment effects for households that were the first to receive the cash transfers.
Taken together, we find significant support for the importance of cash transfers to refugee households mitigating against declines in food security and mental well-being in the face of shocks.
本文旨在评估在新冠疫情和月度援助削减的双重冲击下,向难民一次性发放无条件大额现金补助 4-8 个月后的影响。我们重点关注四个关键结果:(1)寻医行为;(2)新冠疫情相关的预防保健行为;(3)粮食安全;(4)心理健康。
我们结合使用定量和定性数据来理解这一背景下的现金转移影响。定量方面,我们使用了 2019 年第四季度对 1200 户家庭的基线调查,并在 2021 年第二季度和第三季度进行了三轮电话调查,每轮调查都至少涵盖了样本的一半。我们利用现金转移时间的实验性变化,通过倾向得分治疗的普通最小二乘回归评估现金转移的效果。在控制关键基线特征的情况下,我们分析了现金转移对健康获取、新冠疫情保健行为、粮食安全和心理健康的影响。定性方面,我们利用难民受访者的纵向小样本,对每位受访者在 2020 年 2 月至 9 月期间进行了多达 15 次访谈,以了解随时间的变化,并深入探讨关键主题。
我们没有发现收到现金转移对新冠疫情预防措施有统计学上显著的影响(6.2%,p=0.188)。然而,收到现金转移的家庭在粮食安全方面更有保障,粮食安全指数提高了 14.4%(p=0.011),心理健康状况更好(24.5%,p=0.003),并且更有可能到私立医疗机构寻求医疗(10.4%,p=0.057),而对照组家庭则没有。我们没有发现食品消费价值的显著结果。总体而言,我们发现第一批收到现金转移的家庭的治疗效果更强。
综合来看,我们有充分的证据支持现金转移对缓解难民家庭在面临冲击时粮食安全和心理健康下降的重要性。