• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤及院内死亡率:一项全国性研究

Acute Kidney Injury and In-Hospital Mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Study.

作者信息

Shen Wen, Aguilar Rodrigo, Montero Alex R, Fernandez Stephen J, Taylor Allen J, Wilcox Christopher S, Lipkowitz Michael S, Umans Jason G

机构信息

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(3):217-225. doi: 10.1159/000455906. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1159/000455906
PMID:28135709
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-procedural acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with significantly increased short- and long-term mortalities, and renal loss. Few studies have compared the incidence of post-procedural AKI and in-hospital mortality between 2 major modalities of revascularization - coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) - and results have been inconsistent.

METHODS

We generated a propensity score-matched cohort that includes a total of 286,670 hospitalizations with multi-vessel coronary disease undergoing CABG or PCI (2004-2012) from the National Inpatient Sample database. We compared incidence of AKI, AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), in-hospital mortality, hospital stay, and charges between CABG and PCI groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of AKI after CABG was higher than PCI (8.9 vs. 4.5%, OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.99-2.12, p < 0.001). The incidence of AKI requiring RRT was also higher after CABG (1.1 vs. 0.5%, OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.96-2.34, p < 0.001). Likewise, in-hospital mortality was higher after CABG than PCI (2.0 vs. 1.4%, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.35-1.52, p < 0.001). Among patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (stages I-IV), those undergoing CABG was associated with 2.0-2.3-fold higher odds of developing AKI than those undergoing PCI. The patients treated with CABG had a significantly longer hospital stay and higher hospital charges.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing CABG are associated with (1) increased risk of developing post-procedural AKI, (2) higher likelihood of receiving RRT, and (3) worse short-term survival. Long-term renal outcome remains to be studied.

摘要

背景

术后急性肾损伤(AKI)与短期和长期死亡率以及肾丢失的显著增加相关。很少有研究比较两种主要血运重建方式——冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)——术后AKI的发生率和院内死亡率,结果并不一致。

方法

我们从国家住院患者样本数据库中生成了一个倾向评分匹配队列,其中包括2004年至2012年期间共286,670例接受CABG或PCI治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病住院患者。我们比较了CABG组和PCI组之间AKI的发生率、需要肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的AKI发生率、院内死亡率、住院时间和费用。

结果

CABG术后AKI的发生率高于PCI(8.9%对4.5%,OR 2.05,95%CI 1.99 - 2.12,p < 0.001)。CABG术后需要RRT的AKI发生率也更高(1.1%对0.5%,OR 2.14,95%CI 1.96 - 2.34,p < 0.001)。同样,CABG术后的院内死亡率高于PCI(2.0%对1.4%,OR 1.44,95%CI 1.35 - 1.52,p < 0.001)。在已有慢性肾脏病(I - IV期)的患者中,接受CABG的患者发生AKI的几率比接受PCI的患者高2.0至2.3倍。接受CABG治疗的患者住院时间明显更长,住院费用更高。

结论

接受CABG治疗的患者存在以下情况:(1)术后发生AKI的风险增加;(2)接受RRT的可能性更高;(3)短期生存率更差。长期肾脏结局仍有待研究。

相似文献

1
Acute Kidney Injury and In-Hospital Mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Study.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤及院内死亡率:一项全国性研究
Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(3):217-225. doi: 10.1159/000455906. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
2
Comparison of the Frequency of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Renal Transplant Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的肾移植患者急性肾损伤发生率的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;120(7):1104-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.047. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在需要透析的终末期肾病患者中的比较(CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 登记研究队列-2 的 5 年结果)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
Postoperative acute kidney injury defined by RIFLE criteria predicts early health outcome and long-term survival in patients undergoing redo coronary artery bypass graft surgery.根据RIFLE标准定义的术后急性肾损伤可预测再次冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的早期健康结局和长期生存率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jul;152(1):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.047. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
5
Acute kidney injury following coronary revascularization procedures in patients with advanced CKD.慢性肾脏病晚期患者冠状动脉血运重建术后急性肾损伤。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):1894-1901. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy178.
6
Long-term patient and kidney survival after coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, or medical therapy for patients with chronic kidney disease: a propensity-matched cohort study.冠状动脉搭桥术、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或药物治疗的慢性肾脏病患者的长期患者及肾脏生存率:一项倾向匹配队列研究
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Jan;29(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000557.
7
Acute kidney injury after CABG versus PCI: an observational study using 2 cohorts.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤:使用 2 个队列的观察性研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 9;64(10):985-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.077.
8
Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis and in-hospital mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing early vs delayed percutaneous coronary intervention: A nationwide analysis.慢性肾脏病合并非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者早期与延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后需要透析的急性肾损伤及院内死亡率:一项全国性分析
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Dec;40(12):1303-1308. doi: 10.1002/clc.22828. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
9
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of In-Hospital Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后院内经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的发生率、预测因素和结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 5;73(4):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.071.
10
Incidence and impact of acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with coronary artery bypass grafting: Insights from the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) and Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trials.接受冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者急性肾损伤的发生率及影响:来自急性心肌梗死血管重建和支架置入术疗效协调研究(HORIZONS-AMI)及急性导管插入术和紧急干预分诊策略研究(ACUITY)试验的见解
Am Heart J. 2016 Jan;171(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative and mid-term prognosis in coronary artery bypass grafting patients with mild renal dysfunction.轻度肾功能不全的冠状动脉搭桥术患者的围手术期及中期预后
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2539944. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2539944. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
2
Association of the geriatric nutritional risk index with poor outcomes in patients with coronary revascularization: a cohort study.老年营养风险指数与冠状动脉血运重建患者不良结局的关联:一项队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 24;11:1442957. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1442957. eCollection 2024.
3
The Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Gaps, Challenges, and Solutions.
慢性肾脏病患者冠状动脉疾病的治疗:差距、挑战与解决方案
Kidney Dis (Basel). 2023 Oct 18;10(1):12-22. doi: 10.1159/000533970. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Serum creatinine as a predictor of mortality in patients readmitted to the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study in China.血清肌酐作为心脏手术后再次入住重症监护病房患者死亡率的预测指标:一项中国的回顾性队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1728-1736. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3205.
5
Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes.慢性肾脏病合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者的血运重建策略。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Aug 30;21(10):113. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1213-x.
6
Acute kidney injury following coronary revascularization procedures in patients with advanced CKD.慢性肾脏病晚期患者冠状动脉血运重建术后急性肾损伤。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):1894-1901. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy178.
7
Preoperative blood morphology and incidence of acute kidney injury after on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting - a single-center preliminary report.体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后术前血液形态学与急性肾损伤发生率——单中心初步报告
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2018 Mar;15(1):18-22. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2018.74670. Epub 2018 Mar 28.