Win Alyson, Olson Adam, Hammonds Kendall, Hofkamp Michael P
College of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Temple, Texas.
Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Dec 20;36(2):178-180. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2155929. eCollection 2023.
At our hospital, direct and video laryngoscopy are used in airway management for cesarean deliveries performed with general anesthesia. We hypothesized that video laryngoscopy would have a higher success rate of endotracheal intubation on the first attempt compared to direct laryngoscopy. We used our electronic medical record system to search for patients who had cesarean deliveries with general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation performed in the operating room from July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2021. Totals of 186 and 176 patients had direct and video laryngoscopy for the first intubation attempts, respectively; 177 (95%) and 163 (93%) patients, respectively, had a successful intubation on the first attempt with each method. The odds ratio of successful intubation on the first attempt for video laryngoscopy was 0.64 (95% CI 0.27, 1.53; = 0.31) compared to patients who had direct laryngoscopy. There was no statistically significant difference in Cormack-Lehane grade views of the glottis between direct and video laryngoscopy on the first attempt. In conclusion, there was no statistically significant improvement in the success rate of intubation on the first attempt when video laryngoscopy was used for patients undergoing general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
在我们医院,直接喉镜检查和视频喉镜检查用于全身麻醉下剖宫产的气道管理。我们假设,与直接喉镜检查相比,视频喉镜检查首次气管插管的成功率更高。我们使用电子病历系统搜索了2017年7月1日至2021年6月30日在手术室接受全身麻醉并进行气管插管的剖宫产患者。分别有186例和176例患者首次尝试插管时进行了直接喉镜检查和视频喉镜检查;每种方法首次尝试插管成功的患者分别为177例(95%)和163例(93%)。与接受直接喉镜检查的患者相比,视频喉镜检查首次尝试插管成功的优势比为0.64(95%CI 0.27, 1.53;P = 0.31)。首次尝试时,直接喉镜检查和视频喉镜检查在声门的Cormack-Lehane分级视图上没有统计学显著差异。总之,对于接受全身麻醉剖宫产的患者,使用视频喉镜检查时首次插管成功率没有统计学显著提高。