• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.5 毫米直径差异对自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带移植物失效风险的评估:一项荟萃分析。

Estimation Failure Risk by 0.5-mm Differences in Autologous Hamstring Graft Diameter in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.

Institute for Medical Regulatory Science, Comprehensive Research Organization, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2024 Feb;52(2):535-543. doi: 10.1177/03635465221150654. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1177/03635465221150654
PMID:36876736
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because grafts are made in 0.5-mm increments clinically for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, it is important to clarify how the failure rate decreases as the diameter increases. Moreover, it is important to know whether even a slight increase in the graft diameter decreases the risk of failure.

HYPOTHESIS

The risk of failure decreases significantly with each 0.5-mm increase in hamstring graft diameter.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The systematic review and meta-analysis have estimated the diameter-specific failure risk for each 0.5-mm increase in ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring grafts. We searched for studies describing the relationship between graft diameter and failure rate published before December 1, 2021, in leading databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We included studies using single-bundle autologous hamstring grafts to investigate the relationship between failure rate and graft diameter of 0.5-mm intervals with >1-year follow-up. Then, we calculated the failure risk caused by 0.5-mm differences in autologous hamstring graft diameter. Assuming Poisson distribution for the statistical model, we employed an extended linear mixed-effects model in the meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Five studies containing 19,333 cases were eligible. The meta-analysis revealed that the estimated value of the coefficient of diameter in the Poisson model was -0.2357 with a 95% CI of -0.2743 to -0.1971 ( < .0001). With every 1.0-mm increase in diameter, the failure rate decreased by 0.79 (0.76-0.82) times. In contrast, the failure rate increased by 1.27 (1.22-1.32) times for each 1.0-mm decrease in diameter. The failure rate significantly decreased with each 0.5-mm increase in graft diameter in the range of <7.0 to >9.0 mm from 3.63% to 1.79%.

CONCLUSION

The risk of failure decreased correspondingly with each 0.5-mm increase in graft diameter in the range of <7.0 to >9.0 mm. Failure is multifactorial; however, increasing the graft diameter as much as possible to match each patient's anatomic space without overstuffing is an effective precaution that surgeons can take to reduce failures.

摘要

背景

由于临床上在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中以 0.5 毫米的增量制作移植物,因此明确直径增加时失败率如何降低非常重要。此外,了解移植物直径即使略有增加是否也会降低失败的风险很重要。

假设

随着跟腱移植物直径每增加 0.5 毫米,失败的风险显著降低。

研究设计

荟萃分析;证据水平,4 级。

方法

根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,我们系统地回顾和荟萃分析了使用自体跟腱移植物进行 ACL 重建时,每增加 0.5 毫米直径与失败风险之间的关系。我们在主要数据库(如 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science)中搜索了截至 2021 年 12 月 1 日之前描述移植物直径与失败率之间关系的研究,这些研究发表在这些数据库中。我们纳入了使用单束自体跟腱移植物的研究,以调查 0.5 毫米间隔的移植物直径与 >1 年随访之间的失败率关系。然后,我们计算了由自体跟腱移植物直径的 0.5 毫米差异引起的失败风险。对于统计模型,我们假设泊松分布,并在荟萃分析中使用扩展的线性混合效应模型。

结果

有 5 项研究共纳入 19333 例患者符合条件。荟萃分析显示,泊松模型中直径系数的估计值为-0.2357,95%CI 为-0.2743 至-0.1971(<0.0001)。直径每增加 1.0 毫米,失败率降低 0.79(0.76-0.82)倍。相比之下,直径每减少 1.0 毫米,失败率增加 1.27(1.22-1.32)倍。在 7.0 至>9.0 毫米的范围内,移植物直径每增加 0.5 毫米,失败率从 3.63%降至 1.79%,显著降低。

结论

在 7.0 至>9.0 毫米的范围内,移植物直径每增加 0.5 毫米,失败的风险相应降低。失败是多因素的;然而,尽可能地增加移植物直径以匹配每个患者的解剖空间而不出现过度填充,是外科医生可以采取的有效预防措施,以降低失败率。

相似文献

1
Estimation Failure Risk by 0.5-mm Differences in Autologous Hamstring Graft Diameter in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.0.5 毫米直径差异对自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带移植物失效风险的评估:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Feb;52(2):535-543. doi: 10.1177/03635465221150654. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
2
Allograft Augmentation of Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autografts Is Associated With Increased Graft Failure in Children and Adolescents.同种异体移植物增强腘绳肌腱前交叉韧带自体移植物与儿童和青少年移植物失败增加有关。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1576-1582. doi: 10.1177/0363546519849607. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.用于前交叉韧带重建的腘绳肌自体移植与髌腱自体移植:移植物失败率有差异吗?对47613例患者的荟萃分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9.
4
Hamstring graft diameter above 7 mm has a lower risk of failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.腘绳肌腱移植物直径大于 7 毫米可降低前交叉韧带重建后失败的风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jan;30(1):288-297. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06503-0. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
Small hamstring autograft is defined by a cut-off diameter of 7 mm and not recommended with allograft augmentation in single-bundle ACL reconstruction.小腘绳肌腱移植物的定义为直径小于 7mm,不建议在单束 ACL 重建中与同种异体肌腱增强联合使用。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Nov;27(11):3650-3659. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05475-6. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
Comparing Hamstring Autograft With Hybrid Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.前交叉韧带重建中腘绳肌腱自体移植物与混合移植物的比较:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Apr;36(4):1189-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.10.010. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
7
Comparison of failure rates and functional outcomes between hamstring autografts and hybrid grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前交叉韧带重建中腘绳肌腱自体移植物与混合移植物的失败率和功能结果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Oct;109(6):103499. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103499. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
8
Small Hamstring Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Results in the Same Failure Rate as Larger Hamstring Tendon Graft Reconstruction Alone.用于前交叉韧带重建的小腘绳肌腱移植物结合前外侧韧带重建与单独使用较大腘绳肌腱移植物重建的失败率相同。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Jul;39(7):1671-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.01.101. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
9
Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前交叉韧带重建中四头肌腱自体移植物与骨-髌腱-骨和腘绳肌腱自体移植物的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3425-3439. doi: 10.1177/03635465211030259. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
10
Failure rates of common grafts used in ACL reconstructions: a systematic review of studies published in the last decade.常见 ACL 重建中使用的移植物的失败率:过去十年发表的研究的系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3293-3299. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04147-w. Epub 2021 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Unilateral 8-Strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft Demonstrated Promising Clinical, Radiological, and Second-Look Arthroscopic Outcomes at 2-Year Minimum Follow-up.采用单侧8股自体腘绳肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带,在至少2年的随访中显示出良好的临床、影像学及二次关节镜检查结果。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Aug 8;13(8):23259671251358404. doi: 10.1177/23259671251358404. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Shows Reduced Graft Failure Rates and Superior Residual Rotational Stability Regardless of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Graft: A Systematic Review.联合前交叉韧带和前外侧韧带重建显示无论前外侧韧带重建移植物如何,移植物失败率降低且残余旋转稳定性更佳:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 25;14(7):2237. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072237.
3
No impact of graft size or time to surgery on anterior tibial translation under weight-bearing following ACL reconstruction.在 ACL 重建术后负重情况下,移植物大小或手术时间对胫骨前移无影响。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Mar 6;12(1):e70130. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70130. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Remnant Preservation Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Modified All-Inside Technique With Appendiceal Tibial Tunnel.保留残端前交叉韧带重建:采用阑尾状胫骨隧道的改良全内置技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Sep 10;14(2):103217. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103217. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Is There a Hamstring Autograft Diameter Threshold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?前交叉韧带重建中腘绳肌自体移植物直径是否存在阈值?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Feb 20;13(2):23259671241305427. doi: 10.1177/23259671241305427. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends.前交叉韧带重建中的移植物选择:当前趋势的全面综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 20;60(12):2090. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122090.
7
Quadriceps tendon autograft diameters are routinely above 8 mm, and preoperative size estimation before anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not be necessary for this graft type: A systematic review.股四头肌肌腱自体移植物直径通常超过8mm,对于这种移植物类型,前交叉韧带重建术前可能无需进行尺寸估计:一项系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Sep;33(9):3111-3133. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12558. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
8
Pronator quadratus preserving versus pronator quadratus dissecting approaches in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a systematic review of comparative studies.掌侧钢板固定治疗桡骨远端骨折时保留与切断旋前方肌的前瞻性随机对照研究的系统评价
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2289-2302. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03967-x. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
9
A hamstring autograft diameter ≤ 8 mm is a safe option for smaller, lighter and female athletes who want to return to pivoting sports after ACL reconstruction : Results from a retrospective evaluation of a local ACL register.对于想要在 ACL 重建后重返旋转运动的体型较小、体重较轻的运动员和女性运动员而言,腘绳肌自体移植物直径≤8 mm 是一种安全的选择:来自当地 ACL 登记处的回顾性评估结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5830-5836. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07640-4. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
10
No difference in revision risk between autologous hamstring graft less than 8 mm versus hybrid graft 8 mm or larger in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.在前交叉韧带重建中,自体腘绳肌腱小于 8mm 与混合移植物 8mm 或更大的移植物在翻修风险方面没有差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Aug;31(8):3465-3473. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07437-5. Epub 2023 May 4.