EPI-PHARE, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) and French National Health Insurance (CNAM), 143-147 Boulevard Anatole France, 93285, Saint-Denis, France.
Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire TRUE InnovaTive theRapy for immUne disordErs, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Henri Mondor Hospital, 94010, Créteil, France.
BioDrugs. 2023 May;37(3):397-407. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00584-8. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
Biosimilar products of rituximab came to market in 2017. French pharmacovigilance centers have highlighted an excess of case reports of severe hypersensitivity reactions related to their use compared with the originator product.
The aim of this study was to assess the real-world association between biosimilar versus originator rituximab injections and hypersensitivity reactions, among initiators and switchers, at first injection and over time.
The French National Health Data System was used to identify all rituximab users between 2017 and 2021. A first cohort consisted of patients who initiated rituximab (originator or biosimilar), while a second cohort consisted of originator-to-biosimilar switchers, matched on age, sex, deliveries history, and pathology, with one or two patients still receiving the originator product. The event of interest was defined as a hospitalization for anaphylactic shock or serum sickness following a rituximab injection.
A total of 91,894 patients were included in the initiation cohort-17,605 (19%) with the originator product and 74,289 (81%) with a biosimilar. At initiation, 86/17,605 (0.49%) and 339/74,289 (0.46%) events occurred in the originator and biosimilar groups, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio of biosimilar exposure associated with the event was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.34), and the adjusted hazard ratio for biosimilar versus originator exposure was 1.15 (95% CI 0.93-1.42), showing no increased risk of event with biosimilar use at first injection, and over time. 17,123 switchers were matched to 24,659 non-switchers. No association was found between switch to biosimilars and occurrence of the event.
Our study does not support any association between exposure to rituximab biosimilars versus originator and hospitalization for a hypersensitivity reaction, either at initiation, at switch, or over time.
利妥昔单抗的生物类似药于 2017 年上市。法国药物警戒中心强调,与原研产品相比,其使用与严重超敏反应的病例报告数量过多。
本研究旨在评估在首次注射和随时间推移的情况下,生物类似药与原研利妥昔单抗注射剂与超敏反应之间的真实关联,包括起始患者和转换患者。
使用法国国家健康数据系统确定 2017 年至 2021 年间所有使用利妥昔单抗的患者。第一个队列由开始使用利妥昔单抗(原研或生物类似药)的患者组成,第二个队列由原研药物转换为生物类似药的患者组成,按年龄、性别、分娩史和病理学进行匹配,有一个或两个患者仍在使用原研产品。感兴趣的事件定义为接受利妥昔单抗注射后因过敏性休克或血清病住院。
共纳入 91894 名起始患者-17605 名(19%)使用原研产品,74289 名(81%)使用生物类似药。在起始时,原研组和生物类似药组分别有 86/17605(0.49%)和 339/74289(0.46%)事件发生。生物类似药暴露与事件相关的调整后比值比为 1.04(95%置信区间[CI]0.80-1.34),生物类似药与原研药物暴露的调整后危险比为 1.15(95%CI0.93-1.42),表明首次注射和随时间推移使用生物类似药无增加事件风险。17123 名转换患者与 24659 名非转换患者相匹配。转换为生物类似药与事件发生之间未发现关联。
本研究不支持利妥昔单抗生物类似药与原研药物暴露与超敏反应住院之间的任何关联,无论是起始时、转换时还是随时间推移。