• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 接触者追踪作为评估大流行情况的指标:模拟研究。

COVID-19 Contact Tracing as an Indicator for Evaluating a Pandemic Situation: Simulation Study.

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 6;9:e43836. doi: 10.2196/43836.

DOI:10.2196/43836
PMID:36877958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10131915/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact tracing is a fundamental intervention in public health. When systematically applied, it enables the breaking of chains of transmission, which is important for controlling COVID-19 transmission. In theoretically perfect contact tracing, all new cases should occur among quarantined individuals, and an epidemic should vanish. However, the availability of resources influences the capacity to perform contact tracing. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate its effectiveness threshold. We propose that this effectiveness threshold may be indirectly estimated using the ratio of COVID-19 cases arising from quarantined high-risk contacts, where higher ratios indicate better control and, under a threshold, contact tracing may fail and other restrictions become necessary.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the ratio of COVID-19 cases in high-risk contacts quarantined through contact tracing and its potential use as an ancillary pandemic control indicator.

METHODS

We built a 6-compartment epidemiological model to emulate COVID-19 infection flow according to publicly available data from Portuguese authorities. Our model extended the usual susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered model by adding a compartment Q with individuals in mandated quarantine who could develop infection or return to the susceptible pool and a compartment P with individuals protected from infection because of vaccination. To model infection dynamics, data on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (IR), time until infection, and vaccine efficacy were collected. Estimation was needed for vaccine data to reflect the timing of inoculation and booster efficacy. In total, 2 simulations were built: one adjusting for the presence and absence of variants or vaccination and another maximizing IR in quarantined individuals. Both simulations were based on a set of 100 unique parameterizations. The daily ratio of infected cases arising from high-risk contacts (q estimate) was calculated. A theoretical effectiveness threshold of contact tracing was defined for 14-day average q estimates based on the classification of COVID-19 daily cases according to the pandemic phases and was compared with the timing of population lockdowns in Portugal. A sensitivity analysis was performed to understand the relationship between different parameter values and the threshold obtained.

RESULTS

An inverse relationship was found between the q estimate and daily cases in both simulations (correlations >0.70). The theoretical effectiveness thresholds for both simulations attained an alert phase positive predictive value of >70% and could have anticipated the need for additional measures in at least 4 days for the second and fourth lockdowns. Sensitivity analysis showed that only the IR and booster dose efficacy at inoculation significantly affected the q estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the impact of applying an effectiveness threshold for contact tracing on decision-making. Although only theoretical thresholds could be provided, their relationship with the number of confirmed cases and the prediction of pandemic phases shows the role as an indirect indicator of the efficacy of contact tracing.

摘要

背景

接触者追踪是公共卫生的一项基本干预措施。当系统应用时,它可以打破传播链,这对于控制 COVID-19 的传播很重要。在理论上完美的接触者追踪中,所有新病例都应该出现在被隔离的个体中,疫情应该消失。然而,资源的可获得性影响了进行接触者追踪的能力。因此,有必要估计其有效性阈值。我们提出,这个有效性阈值可以通过接触追踪中隔离的高风险接触者的 COVID-19 病例比例来间接估计,较高的比例表明控制得更好,而且在一定阈值以下,接触者追踪可能失败,需要采取其他限制措施。

目的

本研究评估了通过接触追踪隔离的高风险接触者中的 COVID-19 病例比例及其作为辅助大流行控制指标的潜力。

方法

我们构建了一个 6 compartment 流行病学模型,根据葡萄牙当局公开提供的数据模拟 COVID-19 感染流。我们的模型通过添加一个带有在强制隔离中可能感染或返回易感池的个体的 Q compartment 和一个由于接种疫苗而免受感染的个体的 P compartment,扩展了通常的易感-暴露-感染-恢复模型。为了模拟感染动态,收集了 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险 (IR)、感染时间和疫苗效力的数据。需要对疫苗数据进行估计,以反映接种时间和加强针效力。总共进行了 2 次模拟:一次调整了变体或疫苗接种的存在,另一次则最大限度地提高了隔离个体的 IR。这两个模拟都是基于 100 个独特的参数化方案构建的。计算了源自高风险接触者的感染病例的每日比例(q 估计)。根据 COVID-19 每日病例的分类,根据大流行阶段定义了接触追踪的理论有效性阈值,并与葡萄牙的人口封锁时间进行了比较。进行了敏感性分析,以了解不同参数值与获得的阈值之间的关系。

结果

在这两个模拟中,q 估计值与每日病例之间都存在负相关关系(相关性>0.70)。这两个模拟的理论有效性阈值在 14 天的平均 q 估计值上达到了>70%的阳性预测值,并且至少可以提前 4 天预测到需要采取额外措施,这与第二次和第四次封锁相吻合。敏感性分析表明,只有 IR 和加强剂量在接种时的效力对 q 估计值有显著影响。

结论

我们展示了应用接触追踪有效性阈值对决策的影响。尽管只能提供理论阈值,但它们与确诊病例数量的关系以及对大流行阶段的预测表明,它们可以作为接触追踪有效性的间接指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/c576669c7611/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/643b96365a24/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/1c09df6a51a2/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/8665c4d8afc1/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/057549e50272/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/f9e02e8ab524/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/c576669c7611/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/643b96365a24/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/1c09df6a51a2/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/8665c4d8afc1/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/057549e50272/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/f9e02e8ab524/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8627/10131915/c576669c7611/publichealth_v9i1e43836_fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Contact Tracing as an Indicator for Evaluating a Pandemic Situation: Simulation Study.COVID-19 接触者追踪作为评估大流行情况的指标:模拟研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 6;9:e43836. doi: 10.2196/43836.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A Data-Driven Simulation of the Exposure Notification Cascade for Digital Contact Tracing of SARS-CoV-2 in Zurich, Switzerland.基于数据的瑞士苏黎世 SARS-CoV-2 数字接触者追踪中暴露通知级联的仿真。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218184. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8184.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
5
Effectiveness of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in a simulation model with indirect and informal contact tracing.具有间接和非正式接触者追踪功能的 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序在模拟模型中的效果。
Epidemics. 2024 Mar;46:100735. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100735. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
6
Comparison of Estimated Effectiveness of Case-Based and Population-Based Interventions on COVID-19 Containment in Taiwan.基于病例和基于人群的干预措施对台湾 COVID-19 控制效果的估计比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):913-921. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1644.
7
Number Needed to Quarantine and Proportion of Prevented Infectious Days by Quarantine: Evaluating the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Contact Tracing.需要隔离的人数和通过隔离预防的感染日比例:评估 COVID-19 接触者追踪的有效性。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Nov-Dec;137(6):1178-1186. doi: 10.1177/00333549221114343. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
8
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and transmission risk factors among high-risk close contacts: a retrospective cohort study.SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率和高危密切接触者的传播风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;21(3):333-343. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30833-1. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
9
Factors Associated With Using the COVID-19 Mobile Contact-Tracing App Among Individuals Diagnosed With SARS-CoV-2 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Observational Study.与在荷兰阿姆斯特丹被诊断患有 SARS-CoV-2 的个体使用 COVID-19 移动接触者追踪应用程序相关的因素:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e31099. doi: 10.2196/31099.
10
High infectiousness immediately before COVID-19 symptom onset highlights the importance of continued contact tracing.在 COVID-19 症状出现之前具有很高的传染性,这凸显了持续进行接触者追踪的重要性。
Elife. 2021 Apr 26;10:e65534. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65534.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the close contacts in a small rural area in the Veneto Region (NE-Italy): past evidence for future scenarios.新冠病毒在威尼托地区(意大利东北部)一个小村庄密切接触者中的传播风险:过去的证据对未来的情况。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 5;11:1223109. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1223109. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Incubation Period of COVID-19 Caused by Unique SARS-CoV-2 Strains: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 株引起的 COVID-19 的潜伏期:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228008. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28008.
2
Compartmental structures used in modeling COVID-19: a scoping review.用于建模 COVID-19 的隔室结构:范围综述。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Jun 21;11(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-01001-y.
3
Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression.
疫苗预防严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)感染和 COVID-19 疾病有效性的持续时间:系统评价和荟萃回归的结果。
Lancet. 2022 Mar 5;399(10328):924-944. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Protection against SARS-CoV-2 after Covid-19 Vaccination and Previous Infection.新冠病毒疫苗接种和既往感染后对 SARS-CoV-2 的保护作用。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1207-1220. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2118691. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
The impact of contact tracing and testing on controlling COVID-19 outbreak without lockdown in Hong Kong: An observational study.接触者追踪与检测对香港在不实施封锁情况下控制新冠疫情的影响:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Mar;20:100374. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100374. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
6
Secondary attack rate of COVID-19 among contacts and risk factors, Tamil Nadu, March-May 2020: a retrospective cohort study.2020年3月至5月,印度泰米尔纳德邦新冠病毒病密切接触者中的二代发病率及危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):e051491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051491.
7
Effectiveness of Contact Tracing for Viral Disease Mitigation and Suppression: Evidence-Based Review.接触者追踪在病毒性疾病缓解和抑制中的效果:基于证据的综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Oct 6;7(10):e32468. doi: 10.2196/32468.
8
Measuring the scientific effectiveness of contact tracing: Evidence from a natural experiment.衡量接触者追踪的科学效果:来自自然实验的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 17;118(33). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100814118.
9
The COVID-19 Data Portal: accelerating SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research through rapid open access data sharing.COVID-19 数据门户:通过快速开放获取数据共享加速 SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 研究。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jul 2;49(W1):W619-W623. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab417.
10
Impact of Public Health and Social Measures on the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States and Other Countries: Descriptive Analysis.公共卫生与社会措施对美国及其他国家新冠疫情的影响:描述性分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 2;7(6):e27917. doi: 10.2196/27917.