Center for AI, Research, and Evaluation, IBM Watson Health, IBM Corporation, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Palantir Technologies, Denver, CO, United States.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Oct 6;7(10):e32468. doi: 10.2196/32468.
Contact tracing in association with quarantine and isolation is an important public health tool to control outbreaks of infectious diseases. This strategy has been widely implemented during the current COVID-19 pandemic. The effectiveness of this nonpharmaceutical intervention is largely dependent on social interactions within the population and its combination with other interventions. Given the high transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2, short serial intervals, and asymptomatic transmission patterns, the effectiveness of contact tracing for this novel viral agent is largely unknown.
This study aims to identify and synthesize evidence regarding the effectiveness of contact tracing on infectious viral disease outcomes based on prior scientific literature.
An evidence-based review was conducted to identify studies from the PubMed database, including preprint medRxiv server content, related to the effectiveness of contact tracing in viral outbreaks. The search dates were from database inception to July 24, 2020. Outcomes of interest included measures of incidence, transmission, hospitalization, and mortality.
Out of 159 unique records retrieved, 45 (28.3%) records were reviewed at the full-text level, and 24 (15.1%) records met all inclusion criteria. The studies included utilized mathematical modeling (n=14), observational (n=8), and systematic review (n=2) approaches. Only 2 studies considered digital contact tracing. Contact tracing was mostly evaluated in combination with other nonpharmaceutical interventions and/or pharmaceutical interventions. Although some degree of effectiveness in decreasing viral disease incidence, transmission, and resulting hospitalizations and mortality was observed, these results were highly dependent on epidemic severity (R0 value), number of contacts traced (including presymptomatic and asymptomatic cases), timeliness, duration, and compliance with combined interventions (eg, isolation, quarantine, and treatment). Contact tracing effectiveness was particularly limited by logistical challenges associated with increased outbreak size and speed of infection spread.
Timely deployment of contact tracing strategically layered with other nonpharmaceutical interventions could be an effective public health tool for mitigating and suppressing infectious outbreaks by decreasing viral disease incidence, transmission, and resulting hospitalizations and mortality.
接触者追踪与隔离和检疫是控制传染病爆发的重要公共卫生手段。这一策略在当前的 COVID-19 大流行中得到了广泛应用。这种非药物干预的有效性在很大程度上取决于人群中的社会互动及其与其他干预措施的结合。鉴于 SARS-CoV-2 的高传染性、短的连续间隔和无症状传播模式,这种新型病毒的接触者追踪的有效性在很大程度上是未知的。
本研究旨在根据先前的科学文献,确定和综合有关接触者追踪对传染性病毒病结局的有效性的证据。
进行了一项基于证据的综述,以从 PubMed 数据库中确定与病毒爆发中的接触者追踪的有效性相关的研究,包括预印本 medRxiv 服务器的内容。检索日期为数据库建立之日至 2020 年 7 月 24 日。感兴趣的结果包括发病率、传播、住院和死亡率的衡量指标。
在检索到的 159 条独特记录中,有 45 条(28.3%)记录在全文层面进行了审查,有 24 条(15.1%)记录符合所有纳入标准。这些研究采用了数学建模(n=14)、观察性(n=8)和系统综述(n=2)方法。只有 2 项研究考虑了数字接触者追踪。接触者追踪主要与其他非药物干预和/或药物干预结合进行评估。虽然观察到在降低病毒病发病率、传播和由此导致的住院和死亡率方面有一定程度的有效性,但这些结果高度依赖于疾病的严重程度(R0 值)、接触者追踪的数量(包括有症状和无症状病例)、及时性、持续时间和对联合干预措施(如隔离、检疫和治疗)的遵守情况。接触者追踪的有效性特别受到与爆发规模增加和感染传播速度加快相关的后勤挑战的限制。
及时战略性地部署接触者追踪,并与其他非药物干预措施相结合,可能是一种有效的公共卫生手段,可以通过降低病毒病发病率、传播和由此导致的住院和死亡率,减轻和抑制传染病的爆发。