• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Credibility Conundrum: Can Social Media Companies Define Credibility for Users?

作者信息

Lalani Hussain S, Laine Christine

机构信息

Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (H.S.L.).

Editor in Chief, Annals of Internal Medicine, Senior Vice President, American College of Physicians, and Professor of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (C.L.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2023 May;176(5):721-722. doi: 10.7326/M23-0490. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

DOI:10.7326/M23-0490
PMID:36877967
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The Credibility Conundrum: Can Social Media Companies Define Credibility for Users?可信度难题：社交媒体公司能否为用户定义可信度？
Ann Intern Med. 2023 May;176(5):721-722. doi: 10.7326/M23-0490. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
Belief that Progress has Been Made in Curing Cancer Varies by Perception of Social Media Health Mis- and Disinformation, Education, Frequency of Social Media Use, and Healthcare System Trust: A Cross-Sectional Study.相信在治愈癌症方面已经取得进展的程度因对社交媒体健康错误和虚假信息的看法、教育程度、社交媒体使用频率以及对医疗保健系统的信任程度而异：一项横断面研究。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241289259. doi: 10.1177/10732748241289259.
3
Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation.为什么人们会在网上传播虚假信息？信息和观众特征对自我报告的社交媒体虚假信息分享可能性的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239666. eCollection 2020.
4
How Vaccination Rumours Spread Online: Tracing the Dissemination of Information Regarding Adverse Events of COVID-19 Vaccines.疫苗谣言如何在网上传播：追踪关于 COVID-19 疫苗不良事件信息的传播。
Int J Public Health. 2022 May 30;67:1604228. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604228. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of Disinformation Using Deepfake: The Protective Effect of Media Literacy Education.利用深度伪造信息的影响：媒体素养教育的保护作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Mar;24(3):188-193. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0174. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Moral leniency towards belief-consistent disinformation may help explain its spread on social media.对与信仰一致的虚假信息持道德宽容态度，可能有助于解释其在社交媒体上的传播。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0281777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281777. eCollection 2023.
7
Deepfakes, trolls and cybertroopers: how social media could sway elections in 2024.深度伪造、网络喷子和网络部队：社交媒体如何在2024年影响选举。
Nature. 2024 Feb;626(7999):463-464. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00274-7.
8
Practices and promises of Facebook for science outreach: Becoming a "Nerd of Trust".脸书在科学推广方面的实践与承诺：成为“值得信赖的书呆子”。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jun 27;15(6):e2002020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002020. eCollection 2017 Jun.
9
How weaponizing disinformation can bring down a city's power grid.将虚假信息武器化如何能使一座城市的电网瘫痪。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0236517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236517. eCollection 2020.
10
Authenticity and credibility aware detection of adverse drug events from social media.社交媒体中药物不良反应的真实性和可信度感知检测。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:157-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Interventions to Address Infodemics Through Epidemiological, Socioecological, and Environmental Health Models: Framework Analysis.通过流行病学、社会生态和环境卫生模型应对信息疫情的干预措施理解：框架分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Mar 24;5:e67119. doi: 10.2196/67119.