McClain Craig R
Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Chauvin, Louisiana, United States of America.
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jun 27;15(6):e2002020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002020. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Arguably, the dissemination of science communication has recently entered a new age in which science must compete for public attention with fake news, alternate facts, and pseudoscience. This clash is particularly evident on social media. Facebook has taken a prime role in disseminating fake news, alternate facts, and pseudoscience, but is often ignored in the context of science outreach, especially among individual scientists. Based on new survey data, scientists appear in large Facebook networks but seldom post information about general science, their own scientific research, or culturally controversial topics in science. The typical individual scientist's audience is large and personally connected, potentially leading to both a broad and deep engagement in science. Moreover, this media values individual expertise, allowing scientists to serve as a "Nerd of Trust" for their online friend and family networks. Science outreach via social media demands a renewed interest, and Facebook may be an overlooked high-return, low-risk science outreach tool in which scientists can play a valuable role to combat disinformation.
可以说,科学传播的扩散最近进入了一个新时代,在这个时代,科学必须与假新闻、另类事实和伪科学争夺公众的注意力。这种冲突在社交媒体上尤为明显。脸书在传播假新闻、另类事实和伪科学方面扮演了主要角色,但在科学推广的背景下,尤其是在个体科学家当中,它常常被忽视。根据新的调查数据,科学家出现在大型脸书网络中,但很少发布关于一般科学、他们自己的科研成果或科学领域中具有文化争议性的话题的信息。典型的个体科学家的受众规模庞大且有个人联系,这有可能导致对科学进行广泛而深入的参与。此外,这种媒介重视个人专业知识,使科学家能够成为其在线朋友和家庭网络的“可信书呆子”。通过社交媒体进行科学推广需要重新引起关注,而脸书可能是一个被忽视的高回报、低风险的科学推广工具,科学家可以在其中发挥重要作用来对抗虚假信息。