Huan Yizhong, Zhang Tianxiang, Zhou Guangjin, Zhang Linxiu, Wang Lingqing, Wang Siyu, Feng Zhaohui, Liang Tao
School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; Institute for Sustainable Development Goals, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 May 20;874:162409. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162409. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
Understanding the interactions among Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is critical for prioritizing SDGs and accelerating the overall SDGs progress. However, SDG interactions and prioritizations at the regional scale have rarely been researched (e.g., Asia), and more importantly, their spatial differences and temporal variations remain elusive. Here, we focused on the Asian Water Tower region (16 countries), which represents major challenges for Asian and even global SDG progress, and we assessed the spatiotemporal variations in SDG interactions and prioritizations in the region from 2000 to 2020 based on correlation coefficients calculations and network analyses. We observed a striking spatial difference in the SDG interactions, which may be minimized by promoting balanced progress toward SDGs 1 (no poverty), 5 (gender equality), and 11 (sustainable cities and communities) across countries. The prioritization differences of the same SDG across countries ranged from 8 to 16 places. Temporally, the SDG trade-offs in the region have declined, implying a possible shift to synergies. However, such success has faced several obstacles, mainly climate change and a lack of partnerships. The prioritizations of SDGs 1 and 12 (responsible consumption and production) have shown the largest increase and decrease, respectively, over time. Overall, to accelerate the regional SDG progress, we highlight the importance of enhancing top prioritized SDGs 3 (good health and well-being), 4 (quality education), 6 (clean water and sanitation), 11, and 13 (climate actions). Related complex actions are also provided (e.g., across-scaled cooperation, interdisciplinary research, and sectoral transformation).
了解可持续发展目标(SDGs)之间的相互作用对于确定可持续发展目标的优先顺序和加速可持续发展目标的整体进展至关重要。然而,区域层面(如亚洲)的可持续发展目标相互作用和优先顺序很少得到研究,更重要的是,它们的空间差异和时间变化仍然难以捉摸。在此,我们聚焦于亚洲水塔地区(16个国家),该地区对亚洲乃至全球可持续发展目标的进展构成重大挑战,我们基于相关系数计算和网络分析评估了2000年至2020年该地区可持续发展目标相互作用和优先顺序的时空变化。我们观察到可持续发展目标相互作用存在显著的空间差异,通过促进各国在可持续发展目标1(消除贫困)、5(性别平等)和11(可持续城市和社区)方面的平衡进展,这种差异可能会最小化。同一可持续发展目标在各国的优先顺序差异从第8位到第16位不等。在时间上,该地区的可持续发展目标权衡有所下降,这意味着可能转向协同增效。然而,这种成功面临一些障碍,主要是气候变化和缺乏伙伴关系。随着时间的推移,可持续发展目标1和12(负责任的消费和生产)的优先顺序分别出现了最大幅度的上升和下降。总体而言,为加速该地区可持续发展目标的进展,我们强调加强首要优先的可持续发展目标3(良好健康与福祉)、4(优质教育)、6(清洁水和卫生设施)、11和13(气候行动)的重要性。还提供了相关的复杂行动(如跨尺度合作、跨学科研究和部门转型)。