Department of Otolaryngology and Laryngological Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Department of Phoniatry and Audiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):881-888. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2171106.
Surgery, the treatment of choice for parotid pleomorphic adenoma (PA), is associated with facial nerve palsy and decreased quality of life. Re-operation for PA recurrence (rPA) significantly increases these risks and constitutes a dilemma for both patient and surgeon. Factors influencing the success of re-operation, as well as the self-reported satisfaction of both sides, have yet to be addressed in the literature. This study aims to improve upon the decision-making schedule in PA re-operations, based on patient expectations, imaging, and concordance with the first operative report (FOpR).
Seventy-two rPAs treated in a single tertiary center were collected and analyzed. The FOpRs and pre-operative imaging were divided according to defined criteria into accurate and non-accurate categories. The re-operative field and course were categorized as anticipated or unanticipated. The re-operation was categorized as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for both the patient and the surgeon.
The accuracy of FOpRs and pre-operative imaging was 36.1% and 69.4%, respectively. Re-operative courses were: 36.1% anticipated and 63.9% unanticipated. The most frequently omitted data were: presence of satellite tumors (9.7%), and amount of removed parenchyma (9.7%). Variables that most commonly affected FOpR non-accuracy were: tumor size (Chi2(1)=59.92; < 0.001) and capsule condition (Chi2(1)=29.11; < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between FOpR accuracy and re-operative course (Chi2(1)=1.14; = 0.286), patient satisfaction (Chi2(1)=1.94; = 0.164) or surgeon satisfaction (Chi2(1)=0.04; = 0.837). Pre-operative imaging (Chi2(1)=36.73; < 0.001) had the greatest impact on surgeon satisfaction.
Accurate pre-operative imaging impacted surgeon satisfaction. The impact of the FOpR on re-operation technicalities and patient satisfaction was minor. Imaging precision should be improved to streamline the decision-making process of PA re-operation. This article proposes suggestions for a future decision-making algorithm as a starting point for a prospective study.Key messagesAccurate pre-operative imaging impacts both surgeon and patient satisfaction.There is no significant relationship between the accuracy of the first operative report and surgeon and patient satisfaction.There is a statistically significant relationship between patient and surgeon satisfaction.
手术是腮腺多形性腺瘤(PA)的首选治疗方法,但会导致面神经瘫痪和生活质量下降。PA 复发(rPA)的再次手术会显著增加这些风险,这对患者和外科医生来说都是一个两难的选择。影响再次手术成功的因素,以及双方对手术的自我满意度,在文献中尚未得到解决。本研究旨在根据患者的期望、影像学检查和与首次手术报告(FOpR)的一致性,改进 PA 再次手术的决策方案。
收集并分析了在一家三级中心治疗的 72 例 rPA。FOpR 和术前影像学检查根据定义的标准分为准确和不准确两类。再次手术的术野和过程分为预期和非预期。患者和外科医生对再次手术的满意度分为满意和不满意。
FOpR 和术前影像学检查的准确性分别为 36.1%和 69.4%。再次手术过程分别为:36.1%的术野是预期的,63.9%的术野是非预期的。最常遗漏的数据是:卫星肿瘤的存在(9.7%)和切除的实质量(9.7%)。影响 FOpR 不准确的常见变量是:肿瘤大小(Chi2(1)=59.92;<0.001)和包膜情况(Chi2(1)=29.11;<0.001)。FOpR 准确性与再次手术过程(Chi2(1)=1.14;=0.286)、患者满意度(Chi2(1)=1.94;=0.164)或外科医生满意度(Chi2(1)=0.04;=0.837)之间没有显著关系。术前影像学检查(Chi2(1)=36.73;<0.001)对外科医生的满意度影响最大。
准确的术前影像学检查影响外科医生和患者的满意度。FOpR 对再次手术技术和患者满意度的影响较小。应提高影像学检查的准确性,以简化 PA 再次手术的决策过程。本文提出了未来决策算法的建议,作为前瞻性研究的起点。
准确的术前影像学检查影响患者和外科医生的满意度。首次手术报告的准确性与外科医生和患者的满意度之间没有显著关系。患者和外科医生的满意度之间存在统计学上的显著关系。