McGonagle Dennis, McInnes Iain B, Deodhar Atul, Schett Georg, Shawi May, Chakravarty Soumya D, Kollmeier Alexa P, Xu Xie L, Sheng Shihong, Xu Stephen, Ritchlin Christopher T, Rahman Proton, Mease Phillip J
Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.
Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;5(4):227-240. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11537. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
Previous analyses of pooled DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 data through Week 24 showed significantly higher rates of dactylitis resolution in patients treated with guselkumab compared with placebo. Here, we investigate associations between dactylitis resolution and other outcomes through 1 year.
Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of guselkumab 100 mg at Week 0, Week 4, and then every 4 or 8 weeks, or placebo with crossover to guselkumab at Week 24. Independent assessors determined dactylitis severity score (DSS; 0-3/digit; total = 0-60). Dactylitis resolution (DSS = 0) (prespecified) and at least 20%, at least 50%, and at least 70% DSS improvement from baseline (post hoc) were determined through Week 52 (nonresponder imputation for treatment failure through Week 24 and for missing data through Week 52). ACR50, tender/swollen joints, low disease activity (LDA) as assessed by composite indices, and radiographic progression (DISCOVER-2 only) were assessed in patients with dactylitis versus without dactylitis resolution at Week 24 and Week 52.
Patients with dactylitis at baseline (473 of 1118) had more severe joint and skin disease than those without dactylitis (645 of 1118). At Week 52, approximately 75% of guselkumab-randomized patients with dactylitis at baseline had complete resolution; approximately 80% had at least 70% DSS improvement. Through Week 52, new-onset dactylitis (DSS ≥1) was uncommon among patients with a DSS of 0 at baseline. Guselkumab-randomized patients with dactylitis resolution were more likely to achieve ACR50, at least 50% reduction in tender and swollen joints, and LDA at Week 24 and Week 52 than those without resolution. At Week 52, patients with dactylitis resolution had numerically less radiographic progression from baseline (DISCOVER-2).
Through 1 year, approximately 75% of guselkumab-randomized patients had complete resolution of dactylitis; patients exhibiting resolution were more likely to achieve other important clinical outcomes. Given the high burden of dactylitis, resolution may be associated with better long-term patient outcomes.
既往对DISCOVER - 1和DISCOVER - 2汇总数据至第24周的分析显示,与安慰剂相比,接受古塞库单抗治疗的患者中,指(趾)炎缓解率显著更高。在此,我们研究指(趾)炎缓解与1年内其他结局之间的关联。
患者按1:1:1随机分组,在第0周、第4周皮下注射100 mg古塞库单抗,随后每4周或8周注射一次,或注射安慰剂,并在第24周交叉至古塞库单抗组。独立评估者确定指(趾)炎严重程度评分(DSS;0 - 3分/指;总分=0 - 60分)。通过第52周确定指(趾)炎缓解(DSS = 0)(预先设定)以及与基线相比DSS改善至少20%、至少50%和至少70%(事后分析)的情况(对第24周治疗失败以及第52周缺失数据采用无反应者插补法)。在第24周和第52周,对有指(趾)炎缓解和无指(趾)炎缓解的患者评估美国风湿病学会50%改善标准(ACR50)、压痛/肿胀关节数、综合指数评估的低疾病活动度(LDA)以及影像学进展(仅针对DISCOVER - 2)。
基线时有指(趾)炎的患者(1118例中的473例)比无指(趾)炎的患者(1118例中的645例)有更严重的关节和皮肤疾病。在第52周时,基线时有指(趾)炎且随机接受古塞库单抗治疗的患者中,约75%实现了完全缓解;约80%的患者DSS改善至少70%。至第52周,基线时DSS为0的患者中,新发指(趾)炎(DSS≥1)并不常见。基线时有指(趾)炎且随机接受古塞库单抗治疗并实现缓解的患者,在第24周和第52周比未缓解的患者更有可能达到ACR50、压痛和肿胀关节数至少减少50%以及达到LDA。在第52周时,有指(趾)炎缓解的患者与基线相比影像学进展数值上更少(DISCOVER - 2)。
在1年时间里,随机接受古塞库单抗治疗的患者中约75%的指(趾)炎完全缓解;实现缓解的患者更有可能达成其他重要的临床结局。鉴于指(趾)炎负担较重,缓解可能与患者更好的长期结局相关。