Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Translational Medicine Center, Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China.
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023 Oct;8(5):368-378. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-001998. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been preliminarily applied to treat patients with disorders of consciousness (DoCs). The study aimed to determine whether DBS was effective for treating patients with DoC and identify factors related to patients' outcomes.
Data from 365 patients with DoCs who were consecutively admitted from 15 July 2011 to 31 December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Multivariate regression and subgroup analysis were performed to adjust for potential confounders. The primary outcome was improvement in consciousness at 1 year.
An overall improvement in consciousness at 1 year was achieved in 32.4% (12/37) of the DBS group compared with 4.3% (14/328) of the conservative group. After full adjustment, DBS significantly improved consciousness at 1 year (adjusted OR 11.90, 95% CI 3.65-38.46, p<0.001). There was a significant treatment×follow up interaction (H=14.99, p<0.001). DBS had significantly better effects in patients with minimally conscious state (MCS) compared with patients with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (p for interaction <0.001). A nomogram based on age, state of consciousness, pathogeny and duration of DoCs indicated excellent predictive performance (c-index=0.882).
DBS was associated with better outcomes in patients with DoC, and the effect was likely to be significantly greater in patients with MCS. DBS should be cautiously evaluated by nomogram preoperatively, and randomised controlled trials are still needed.
深部脑刺激(DBS)已初步应用于治疗意识障碍(DOC)患者。本研究旨在确定 DBS 是否对治疗 DOC 患者有效,并确定与患者结局相关的因素。
回顾性分析了 2011 年 7 月 15 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日连续收治的 365 例意识障碍患者的数据。采用多变量回归和亚组分析来调整潜在混杂因素。主要结局为 1 年后意识改善。
与保守治疗组的 4.3%(14/328)相比,DBS 组的 1 年后意识整体改善率为 32.4%(12/37)。经过完全调整,DBS 显著改善了 1 年后的意识(调整后的 OR 11.90,95%CI 3.65-38.46,p<0.001)。治疗×随访交互作用有统计学意义(H=14.99,p<0.001)。与植物状态/无反应觉醒综合征(VS/UWS)患者相比,DBS 对最小意识状态(MCS)患者的效果明显更好(交互作用 p 值<0.001)。基于年龄、意识状态、病因和 DOC 持续时间的列线图表明了良好的预测性能(c 指数=0.882)。
DBS 与意识障碍患者的更好结局相关,在 MCS 患者中效果可能更显著。术前应根据列线图谨慎评估 DBS,并仍需要开展随机对照试验。