Suppr超能文献

肯尼亚萨拉迪迪基于社区的氯喹治疗疟疾的应用情况。

Usage of community-based chloroquine treatment for malaria in Saradidi, Kenya.

作者信息

Kaseje D C, Spencer H C, Sempebwa E K

机构信息

Department of Community Health, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1987 Apr;81 Suppl 1:111-5. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1987.11812196.

Abstract

A survey was done in June 1983 in Saradidi, Kenya, one year after the inception of a community-based malaria control programme to determine if people were obtaining malaria treatment from volunteer village health helpers (VHH's) chosen by the community. Ten of 36 villages were randomly chosen. From these ten villages, 100 households were randomly selected and 222 people ten years of age or more were interviewed; 113 (50.9%) had a history of malaria in the previous two weeks and 82 (72.6% of 113) had taken medicine for malaria in that period. Of these 82, 51.2% obtained drug from the VHH, 28% purchased it from a shop, 12.2% from a health facility, 4.9% from family members and 3.7% from a private practitioner or a shop outside Saradidi. Reasons given for not obtaining treatment from the VHH's among the 40 people who went elsewhere for treatment included: the VHH was not at home when needed (35%); the VHH had no drugs (22.5%); the patient was too sick for the VHH to treat (10%); had drugs already in the home (10%); 'not registered' with VHH (10%); VHH 'no good' (7.5%); and more 'convenient' to go elsewhere (5%). Similar results found on questioning the mother were obtained for 103 children under nine years old in these households; 67 (65.0%) children had a history of malaria in the previous two weeks and 59 (88.1%) of these 67 children had received antimalarial treatment. The VHH was the principal source of treatment (50.8% of 59), followed by health facilities (20.3%) and shops (18.6%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

1983年6月,在肯尼亚的萨拉迪迪进行了一项调查。这是一项基于社区的疟疾控制项目开展一年之后,目的是确定人们是否从社区选出的志愿乡村健康助手(VHH)那里获得疟疾治疗。从36个村庄中随机选取了10个。在这10个村庄里,随机挑选了100户家庭,对222名10岁及以上的人员进行了访谈;其中113人(50.9%)在过去两周有疟疾病史,这113人中82人(72.6%)在那段时间服用了抗疟疾药物。在这82人中,51.2%从VHH处获得药物,28%从商店购买,12.2%从医疗机构获取,4.9%从家庭成员处得到,3.7%从萨拉迪迪以外的私人医生或商店获取。在40名去其他地方治疗的人中,给出的未从VHH处获得治疗的原因包括:需要时VHH不在家(35%);VHH没有药物(22.5%);患者病得太重VHH无法治疗(10%);家里已有药物(10%);未在VHH处“登记”(10%);VHH“不行”(7.5%);去其他地方更“方便”(5%)。对这些家庭中103名9岁以下儿童的母亲进行询问,得到了类似结果;67名(65.0%)儿童在过去两周有疟疾病史,这67名儿童中有59名(88.1%)接受了抗疟疾治疗。VHH是主要的治疗来源(59人的50.8%),其次是医疗机构(20.3%)和商店(18.6%)。(摘要截取自250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验