• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人胰十二指肠切除术短期结果的程序性容量影响:队列研究和学习曲线分析。

The influence of procedural volume on short-term outcomes for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy-a cohort study and a learning curve analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Department of Academic Surgery and Cancer, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4719-4727. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09941-8. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-023-09941-8
PMID:36890417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10234850/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of robotic pancreatoduodenectomies (RPD) are reported, however, questions remain on the number of procedures needed for gaining technical proficiency in RPD. Therefore, we aimed to assess the influence of procedure volume on short-term RPD outcomes and assess the learning curve effect.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive RPD cases was undertaken. Non-adjusted cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed to identify the procedure volume threshold, following which before-threshold and after-threshold outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Since May 2017, 60 patients had undergone an RPD at our institution. The median operative time was 360 min (IQR 302.25-442 min). CUSUM analysis of operative time identified 21 cases as proficiency threshold, indicated by curve inflexion. Median operative time was significantly shorter after the threshold of 21 cases (470 vs 320 min, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between before- and after-threshold groups in major Clavien-Dindo complications (23.8 vs 25.6%, p = 0.876).

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in operative time after 21 RPD cases suggests a threshold of technical proficiency potentially associated with an initial adjustment to new instrumentation, port placement and standardisation of operative step sequence. RPD can be safely performed by surgeons with prior laparoscopic surgery experience.

摘要

背景

越来越多的机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)被报道,然而,在获得 RPD 技术熟练程度所需的手术数量方面仍存在疑问。因此,我们旨在评估手术数量对 RPD 短期结果的影响,并评估学习曲线效应。

方法

对连续的 RPD 病例进行回顾性研究。采用非调整累积和(CUSUM)分析来确定程序量的阈值,然后比较阈值前后的结果。

结果

自 2017 年 5 月以来,我们医院有 60 名患者接受了 RPD。中位手术时间为 360 分钟(IQR 302.25-442 分钟)。CUSUM 分析手术时间确定了 21 例作为熟练阈值,表明曲线拐点。阈值后的中位手术时间明显缩短(470 与 320 分钟,p < 0.001)。在主要 Clavien-Dindo 并发症方面,阈值前后两组无显著差异(23.8%与 25.6%,p = 0.876)。

结论

21 例 RPD 后手术时间的减少表明存在技术熟练程度的阈值,这可能与新仪器的初始调整、端口放置和手术步骤顺序的标准化有关。有腹腔镜手术经验的外科医生可以安全地进行 RPD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/10234850/547b12e7ae32/464_2023_9941_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/10234850/ff24c2dbf22a/464_2023_9941_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/10234850/547b12e7ae32/464_2023_9941_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/10234850/ff24c2dbf22a/464_2023_9941_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/10234850/547b12e7ae32/464_2023_9941_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of procedural volume on short-term outcomes for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy-a cohort study and a learning curve analysis.机器人胰十二指肠切除术短期结果的程序性容量影响:队列研究和学习曲线分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4719-4727. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09941-8. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
2
Learning curve of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy by a single surgeon with extensive laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy experience.单一外科医生在具有广泛腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术经验的情况下学习机器人胰十二指肠切除术的学习曲线。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 28;18(1):298. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02007-4.
3
The Feasibility, Proficiency, and Mastery Learning Curves in 635 Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies Following a Multicenter Training Program: "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants".635 例机器人胰十二指肠切除术的可行性、熟练程度和掌握学习曲线:“站在巨人的肩膀上”。
Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):e1232-e1241. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005928. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
4
The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center.机器人辅助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术外科医生的学习曲线:在高容量胰腺中心的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2927-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6595-0. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
5
Defining the learning curve for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for a single surgeon following experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.定义一位外科医生在具有腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术经验后进行机器人胰十二指肠切除术的学习曲线。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 16;18(1):126. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01746-0.
6
Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy.机器人胰腺手术的学习曲线——从远端胰腺切除术到胰十二指肠切除术
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(45):e13000. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013000.
7
Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3).多中心机器人胰十二指肠切除术培训项目(LAELAPS-3)的结果。
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e886-e895. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004783. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Feasibility of simultaneous development of laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.腹腔镜和机器人胰十二指肠切除术同时开发的可行性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 16;13(1):6190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33269-x.
9
A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis studying operative times and complications for a surgeon transitioning from laparoscopic to robot-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: Defining proficiency and competency.一项累积和(CUSUM)分析研究了一位外科医生从腹腔镜到机器人辅助小儿肾盂成形术过渡时的手术时间和并发症:确定熟练程度和能力。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Dec;18(6):822-829. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.07.021. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
10
Challenge in optimizing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy including nerve plexus hanging maneuver: a Japanese single center experience of 76 cases.优化包括神经丛悬挂操作的机器人胰十二指肠切除术的挑战:日本单中心 76 例经验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):1077-1087. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10653-2. Epub 2024 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning curve of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy by a single surgeon with extensive laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy experience.单一外科医生在具有广泛腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术经验的情况下学习机器人胰十二指肠切除术的学习曲线。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 28;18(1):298. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02007-4.
2
Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies.机器人辅助与开放胰十二指肠切除术短期结局的比较:一项随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1214-1230. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001871.
3
Safety and learning curve analysis of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of a single surgeon.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning Curves in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Proposal of a Standardization.开放、腹腔镜及机器人胰腺手术的学习曲线:一项系统评价及标准化建议
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jan 27;3(1):e111. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000111. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Rate of Post-Operative Pancreatic Fistula after Robotic-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Pancreato-Jejunostomy versus Pancreato-Gastrostomy: A Retrospective Case Matched Comparative Study.机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术采用胰肠吻合术与胰胃吻合术的术后胰瘘发生率:一项回顾性病例匹配对照研究
J Clin Med. 2021 May 18;10(10):2181. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102181.
3
机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术的安全性和学习曲线分析:单外科医生经验。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 24;18(1):92. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01844-7.
4
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases.与腹腔镜技术相比,机器人远端胰腺切除术的效果更佳:一位外科医生连续123例手术的经验。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;15(22):5492. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225492.
A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.
胰管大小和质地的简易分类可预测术后胰瘘:国际胰腺外科研究组的分类。
Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):e597-e608. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004855. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
4
Surgical training model and safe implementation of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Japan: a technical note.日本机器人胰十二指肠切除术的手术训练模型及安全实施:技术说明
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb 19;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02167-9.
5
Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3).多中心机器人胰十二指肠切除术培训项目(LAELAPS-3)的结果。
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e886-e895. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004783. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus robotic surgical learning curves.通过机器人技术缩短外科培训时间:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术学习曲线的随机临床试验
BJS Open. 2020 Dec 2;4(6):1100-1108. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50353.
7
How I treat pancreatic cancer.我如何治疗胰腺癌。
ESMO Open. 2020 Aug;4(Suppl 2):e000818. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000818.
8
Association of Mentorship and a Formal Robotic Proficiency Skills Curriculum With Subsequent Generations' Learning Curve and Safety for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.师徒制与正式机器人熟练技能课程对后续几代人学习曲线和机器人胰十二指肠切除术安全性的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):607-615. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1040.
9
A better route to ALPPS: minimally invasive vs open ALPPS.更好的 ALPPS 入路:微创与开放 ALPPS。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2379-2389. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07437-3. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
10
Transition from open and laparoscopic to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a UK tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre - Early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.英国一家三级转诊肝胆胰中心行机器人胰十二指肠切除术:从开放和腹腔镜到机器人手术的过渡——机器人胰十二指肠切除术的早期经验。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Nov;22(11):1637-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 1.