• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种分析罕见病中纵向测量有序结局的统计方法的中性比较。

A neutral comparison of statistical methods for analyzing longitudinally measured ordinal outcomes in rare diseases.

机构信息

Team Biostatistics and Big Medical Data, IDA Lab Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Department of Research and Innovation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Biom J. 2024 Jan;66(1):e2200236. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200236. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1002/bimj.202200236
PMID:36890631
Abstract

Ordinal data in a repeated measures design of a crossover study for rare diseases usually do not allow for the use of standard parametric methods, and hence, nonparametric methods should be considered instead. However, only limited simulation studies in settings with small sample sizes exist. Therefore, starting from an Epidermolysis Bullosa simplex trial with the above-mentioned design, a rank-based approach using the R package nparLD and different generalized pairwise comparisons (GPC) methods were compared impartially in a simulation study. The results revealed that there was not one single best method for this particular design, because a trade-off exists between achieving high power, accounting for period effects, and for missing data. Specifically, nparLD as well as the unmatched GPC approaches do not address crossover aspects, and the univariate GPC variants partly ignore the longitudinal information. The matched GPC approaches, on the other hand, take the crossover effect into account in the sense of incorporating the within-subject association. Overall, the prioritized unmatched GPC method achieved the highest power in the simulation scenarios, although this may be due to the specified prioritization. The rank-based approach yielded good power even at a sample size of , whereas the matched GPC method could not control the type I error.

摘要

在罕见病交叉研究的重复测量设计中,有序数据通常不允许使用标准参数方法,因此应考虑使用非参数方法。然而,仅有少量的模拟研究在小样本量的情况下存在。因此,从具有上述设计的单纯型大疱性表皮松解症试验出发,在模拟研究中,使用 R 包 nparLD 和不同的广义成对比较(GPC)方法,公正地比较了基于等级的方法。结果表明,对于这种特殊的设计,不存在一种单一的最佳方法,因为在实现高功效、考虑周期效应和处理缺失数据之间存在权衡。具体来说,nparLD 以及非匹配的 GPC 方法没有解决交叉问题,而单变量 GPC 变体部分忽略了纵向信息。另一方面,匹配的 GPC 方法在一定程度上考虑了交叉效应,即包含了个体内的关联。总的来说,在模拟场景中,优先的非匹配 GPC 方法实现了最高的功效,尽管这可能是由于指定的优先级。基于等级的方法即使在样本量为 的情况下也能获得良好的功效,而匹配的 GPC 方法无法控制 I 型错误。

相似文献

1
A neutral comparison of statistical methods for analyzing longitudinally measured ordinal outcomes in rare diseases.一种分析罕见病中纵向测量有序结局的统计方法的中性比较。
Biom J. 2024 Jan;66(1):e2200236. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200236. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
8
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
9
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

引用本文的文献

1
Reflection on clinical and methodological issues in rare disease clinical trials.对罕见病临床试验中临床及方法学问题的思考。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jun 5;20(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03805-1.
2
Istore: a project on innovative statistical methodologies to improve rare diseases clinical trials in limited populations.Istore:一个关于创新统计方法的项目,旨在改善有限人群中的罕见病临床试验。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Mar 2;19(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03103-2.
3
Statistical recommendations for count, binary, and ordinal data in rare disease cross-over trials.
罕见病交叉试验中计数、二项和有序数据的统计建议。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Dec 19;18(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02990-1.