Dunton Genevieve F, Do Bridgette, Crosley-Lyons Rachel, Naya Christine H, Hewus Micaela, Kanning Martina
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 20;14:1023556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1023556. eCollection 2023.
There has been increasing interest in the extent to which the fulfillment of psychological needs is associated with physical activity engagement. However, a vast majority of studies consider only psychological needs such as relatedness, competence, and autonomy-with psychological needs such as challenge, creativity, and spirituality rarely being addressed. The aim of this study was to examine the preliminary reliability (i.e., internal consistency) and validity (i.e., discriminant, construct, and predictive) of a multi-dimensional scale to assess a range of basic and higher-level psychological needs satisfied through physical activity.
A sample of 75 adults (ages 19-65 years, 59% female, 46% White) completed a baseline questionnaire measuring 13 psychological needs subscales (i.e., physical comfort, safety, social connection, esteem from others, individual esteem, learning, challenge, entertainment, novelty, creativity, mindfulness, aesthetic appreciation, and morality), exercise enjoyment, and exercise vitality. Participants then completed 14 days of accelerometer monitoring of physical activity and ecological momentary assessment of affective responses during physical activity sessions in daily life.
Internal consistency reliability was acceptable (>0.70) for all subscales except for mindfulness, aesthetic appreciation, and morality. Ten of the 13 subscales exhibited discriminant validity by differentiating between engagement (vs. no engagement) in at least one physical activity type (e.g., brisk walking and yoga/Pilates). All the subscales, except physical comfort and esteem from others, were associated with at least one of the construct validation criteria (e.g., exercise enjoyment, affective response during exercise). Five of the subscales were associated with at least one of the predictive validation criteria (i.e., light, moderate, vigorous intensity activity measured by accelerometer).
Having the capacity to assess whether one's current physical activity is failing to fulfill various psychological needs-combined with recommendations about which types of activities may satisfy those needs-may address an important gap in physical activity promotion.
心理需求的满足与身体活动参与之间的关联程度已引发越来越多的关注。然而,绝大多数研究仅考虑诸如关联性、能力和自主性等心理需求,而诸如挑战、创造力和精神性等心理需求则很少被涉及。本研究的目的是检验一个多维量表的初步信度(即内部一致性)和效度(即区分效度、结构效度和预测效度),该量表用于评估通过身体活动满足的一系列基本和高级心理需求。
75名成年人(年龄在19 - 65岁之间,59%为女性,46%为白人)的样本完成了一份基线问卷,该问卷测量了13个心理需求子量表(即身体舒适、安全、社会联系、他人尊重、个人自尊、学习、挑战、娱乐、新奇、创造力、正念、审美欣赏和道德)、运动乐趣和运动活力。参与者随后进行了14天的身体活动加速度计监测以及日常生活中身体活动期间情感反应的生态瞬时评估。
除正念、审美欣赏和道德外,所有子量表的内部一致性信度均可接受(>0.70)。13个子量表中的10个通过区分至少一种身体活动类型(如快走和瑜伽/普拉提)的参与(与不参与)表现出区分效度。除身体舒适和他人尊重外,所有子量表均与至少一项结构效度标准(如运动乐趣、运动期间的情感反应)相关。5个子量表与至少一项预测效度标准(即通过加速度计测量的轻度、中度、剧烈强度活动)相关。
有能力评估一个人当前的身体活动是否未能满足各种心理需求,并结合关于哪些类型的活动可能满足这些需求的建议,可能填补身体活动促进方面的一个重要空白。