Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 临床试验中的社会不平等轴:系统评价。

Axes of social inequities in COVID-19 clinical trials: A systematic review.

机构信息

Grup en Salut Vascular de Girona (ISV-Girona), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAPJGol), Girona, Spain.

Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;11:1069357. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1069357. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The representativeness of participants is crucial to ensure external validity of clinical trials. We focused on the randomized clinical trials which assessed COVID-19 vaccines to assess the reporting of age, sex, gender identity, race, ethnicity, obesity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status in the results (description of the participants' characteristics, loss of follow-up, stratification of efficacy and safety results).

METHODS

We searched the following databases for randomized clinical trials published before 1st February 2022: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Excerpta Medica. We included peer-reviewed articles written in English or Spanish. Four researchers used the Rayyan platform to filter citations, first reading the title and abstract, and then accessing the full text. Articles were excluded if both reviewers agreed, or if a third reviewer decided to discard them.

RESULTS

Sixty three articles were included, which assessed 20 different vaccines, mainly in phase 2 or 3. When describing the participants' characteristics, all the studies reported sex or gender, 73.0% race, ethnicity, 68.9% age groups, and 22.2% obesity. Only one article described the age of participants lost to follow-up. Efficacy results were stratified by age in 61.9%, sex or gender in 26.9%, race and/or, ethnicity in 9.5%, and obesity in 4.8% of the articles. Safety results were stratified by age in 41.0%, and by sex or gender in 7.9% of the analysis. Reporting of gender identity, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status of participants was rare. Parity was reached in 49.2% of the studies, and sex-specific outcomes were mentioned in 22.9% of the analysis, most of the latter were related to females' health.

CONCLUSIONS

Axes of social inequity other than age and sex were hardly reported in randomized clinical trials that assessed COVID-19 vaccines. This undermines their representativeness and external validity and sustains health inequities.

摘要

目的

参与者的代表性对于确保临床试验的外部有效性至关重要。我们专注于评估 COVID-19 疫苗的随机临床试验,以评估结果中(参与者特征描述、随访丢失、疗效和安全性结果分层)报告的年龄、性别、性别认同、种族、民族、肥胖、性取向和社会经济地位。

方法

我们在以下数据库中搜索了截至 2022 年 2 月 1 日之前发表的随机临床试验:PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Excerpta Medica。我们纳入了同行评审的英文或西班牙文文章。四位研究人员使用 Rayyan 平台筛选引文,首先阅读标题和摘要,然后访问全文。如果两位审稿人一致同意或第三位审稿人决定删除,文章将被排除在外。

结果

共纳入 63 篇文章,评估了 20 种不同的疫苗,主要处于 2 期或 3 期。在描述参与者特征时,所有研究均报告了性别或性别、73.0%的种族和民族、68.9%的年龄组和 22.2%的肥胖情况。只有一篇文章描述了随访丢失的参与者的年龄。61.9%的文章按年龄分层报告疗效结果,26.9%按性别或性别分层,9.5%按种族和/或民族分层,4.8%按肥胖分层。41.0%的文章按年龄分层报告安全性结果,7.9%的分析按性别或性别分层报告安全性结果。参与者的性别认同、性取向或社会经济地位的报告很少见。49.2%的研究达到了均衡,22.9%的分析提到了性别特异性结果,其中大多数与女性健康有关。

结论

在评估 COVID-19 疫苗的随机临床试验中,几乎没有报告年龄和性别以外的社会不平等轴。这削弱了它们的代表性和外部有效性,并维持了健康不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c0b/9987589/0bf1274a23de/fpubh-11-1069357-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验