Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 215, Heping West Road, Xinhua District, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.
Ann Nucl Med. 2023 Jun;37(6):349-359. doi: 10.1007/s12149-023-01829-w. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
With improved resolution and sensitivity, the cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detector measures myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) via single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Recently, many studies have used vasodilator stress to obtain quantitative indexes. However, dobutamine used as a pharmaceutical stress has been rarely used to quantify myocardial perfusion using CZT-SPECT. Our study retrospectively analyzed the blood flow performance of Tc-Sestamibi (Tc -MIBI) CZT-SPECT comparing dobutamine to adenosine.
The study aims to explore whether dobutamine stress can be used for the myocardial perfusion quantitative analysis via CZT-SPECT as well as compare dobutamine MBF and MFR to adenosine.
It was a retrospective study. A total of 68 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) were consecutively enrolled in this study. Thirty-four patients underwent dobutamine stress Tc-MIBI CZT-SPECT. Another thirty-four patients underwent adenosine stress Tc-MIBI CZT-SPECT. Patient characteristics, myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) results, gated-myocardial perfusion imaging (G-MPI) results and quantitative analysis of MBF and MFR were collected.
In dobutamine stress group, stress MBF was significantly higher than rest MBF (median [interquartile range], 1.63 [1.46-1.94] vs. 0.89 [0.73-1.06], P < 0.001). In adenosine stress group, similar results were observed (median [interquartile range], 2.01 [1.34-2.20] vs. 0.88 [0.75-1.01], P < 0.001). When comparing the dobutamine and adenosine stress group, global MFR showed significant differences (median [interquartile range], the dobutamine group: 1.88 [1.67-2.38] vs. the adenosine group: 2.19 [1.87-2.64], P = 0.037).
MBF and MFR can be measured using dobutamine Tc -MIBI CZT-SPECT. In small sample single-center study, there was a difference in MFR produced by adenosine and dobutamine within the suspected or the known CAD population.
随着分辨率和灵敏度的提高,碲锌镉(CZT)探测器通过单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)测量心肌血流(MBF)和心肌血流储备(MFR)。最近,许多研究使用血管扩张剂应激来获得定量指标。然而,多巴酚丁胺作为一种药物应激剂,很少用于使用 CZT-SPECT 定量测量心肌灌注。我们的研究回顾性分析了 Tc-Sestamibi(Tc-MIBI)CZT-SPECT 中的血流量表现,比较了多巴酚丁胺与腺苷。
本研究旨在探讨多巴酚丁胺应激是否可用于 CZT-SPECT 的心肌灌注定量分析,并比较多巴酚丁胺 MBF 和 MFR 与腺苷。
这是一项回顾性研究。共连续纳入 68 例疑似或已知冠心病(CAD)患者。34 例患者接受多巴酚丁胺应激 Tc-MIBI CZT-SPECT。另外 34 例患者接受腺苷应激 Tc-MIBI CZT-SPECT。收集患者特征、心肌灌注成像(MPI)结果、门控心肌灌注成像(G-MPI)结果以及 MBF 和 MFR 的定量分析结果。
在多巴酚丁胺应激组中,应激 MBF 明显高于静息 MBF(中位数[四分位距],1.63[1.46-1.94] vs. 0.89[0.73-1.06],P<0.001)。在腺苷应激组中,观察到类似的结果(中位数[四分位距],2.01[1.34-2.20] vs. 0.88[0.75-1.01],P<0.001)。当比较多巴酚丁胺和腺苷应激组时,整体 MFR 存在显著差异(中位数[四分位距],多巴酚丁胺组:1.88[1.67-2.38] vs. 腺苷组:2.19[1.87-2.64],P=0.037)。
多巴酚丁胺 Tc-MIBI CZT-SPECT 可测量 MBF 和 MFR。在小样本单中心研究中,疑似或已知 CAD 人群中腺苷和多巴酚丁胺产生的 MFR 存在差异。