• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标选择和干扰抑制的统计学习中的年龄相关差异。

Age-related differences in the statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression.

作者信息

Lega Carlotta, Di Caro Valeria, Strina Veronica, Daini Roberta

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca.

Department of Neurosciences Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2023 May;38(3):188-202. doi: 10.1037/pag0000735. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1037/pag0000735
PMID:36892906
Abstract

In recent years, the use of implicit mechanisms based on statistical learning (SL) has emerged as a strong factor in biasing visuospatial attention, so that target selection is improved at frequently attended locations and distractor filtering is facilitated at frequently suppressed locations. Although these mechanisms have been consistently described in younger adults, similar evidence in healthy aging is scarce. Therefore, we studied the learning and persistence of SL of target selection and distractor suppression in younger and older adults in visual search tasks where the frequency of target (Experiment 1) or distractor (Experiment 2) was biased across spatial locations. The results show that SL of target selection was preserved in the older adults so, similar to their younger counterparts, they showed a strong and persistent advantage in target selection at locations more frequently attended. However, unlike young adults, they did not benefit from implicit SL of distractor suppression, so that distractor interference was maintained throughout the experiment independently of the contingencies associated with distractor locations. Taken together, these results provide novel evidence of distinct developmental patterns for SL of task-relevant and task-irrelevant visual information, likely reflecting differences in the implementation of proactive suppression attentional mechanisms between younger and older adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

近年来,基于统计学习(SL)的内隐机制的运用已成为影响视觉空间注意偏向的一个重要因素,使得在频繁被关注的位置目标选择得到改善,在频繁被抑制的位置干扰项过滤得到促进。尽管这些机制在年轻人中已得到一致描述,但在健康老年人中的类似证据却很少。因此,我们在视觉搜索任务中研究了年轻人和老年人目标选择与干扰项抑制的统计学习及其持续性,在这些任务中目标(实验1)或干扰项(实验2)的出现频率在空间位置上存在偏向。结果表明,老年人中目标选择的统计学习得以保留,所以与年轻人一样,他们在更频繁被关注的位置的目标选择上表现出强烈且持续的优势。然而,与年轻人不同的是,他们并未从干扰项抑制的内隐统计学习中受益,因此在整个实验过程中干扰项干扰一直存在,与干扰项位置的偶然性无关。综合来看,这些结果为任务相关和任务无关视觉信息的统计学习提供了不同发展模式的新证据,这可能反映了年轻人和老年人在主动抑制注意机制实施上的差异。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Age-related differences in the statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression.目标选择和干扰抑制的统计学习中的年龄相关差异。
Psychol Aging. 2023 May;38(3):188-202. doi: 10.1037/pag0000735. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.通过目标选择和分心物过滤的统计学习来改变空间优先图。
Cortex. 2018 May;102:67-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
3
Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.目标和干扰物空间概率的统计学习形成了一种共同的注意力优先计算。
Cortex. 2023 Dec;169:95-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
4
Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition.衰老会损害反应性注意控制,但不会损害前摄性分心物抑制。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jul;153(7):1938-1959. doi: 10.1037/xge0001602. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Asymmetric learning of dynamic spatial regularities in visual search: Robust facilitation of predictable target locations, fragile suppression of distractor locations.视觉搜索中动态空间规律的非对称学习:可预测目标位置的强大促进作用,干扰物位置的脆弱抑制作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 May;49(5):709-724. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001120.
6
Proactive enhancement and suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.视觉搜索中统计规律引发的主动增强与抑制
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 May;48(5):443-457. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001002. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
7
Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.由统计规律导致的空间抑制是由干扰项抑制驱动的,而非目标激活。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1405-1414. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01704-9.
8
Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.对无关空间位置的内隐学习抑制
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1873-1881. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1065-y.
9
Statistical learning of target location and distractor location rely on different mechanisms during visual search.在视觉搜索中,目标位置和分心物位置的统计学习依赖于不同的机制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb;85(2):342-365. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02626-9. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
10
More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.更多的捕获,更多的抑制:由于统计规律而产生的分心物抑制取决于注意捕获的强度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):86-95. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01672-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Statistical learning re-shapes the center-surround inhibition of the visuo-spatial attentional focus.统计学习重塑了视觉空间注意力焦点的中心-外周抑制。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7656. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91949-2.
2
Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition.衰老会损害反应性注意控制,但不会损害前摄性分心物抑制。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jul;153(7):1938-1959. doi: 10.1037/xge0001602. Epub 2024 May 23.
3
Eye movements reveal age differences in how arousal modulates saliency priority but not attention processing speed.
眼动揭示了在唤醒如何调节显著性优先级而非注意力处理速度方面的年龄差异。
bioRxiv. 2024 May 8:2024.05.06.592619. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.06.592619.