Kaiser Permanente, Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, Rockville, MD.
Kaiser Permanente, Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO.
Med Care. 2023 Apr 1;61(Suppl 1):S39-S46. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001832. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In recent years, 2 circumstances changed provider-patient interactions in primary care: the substitution of virtual (eg, video) for in-person visits and the COVID-19 pandemic. We studied whether access to care might affect patient fulfillment of ancillary services orders for ambulatory diagnosis and management of incident neck or back pain (NBP) and incident urinary tract infection (UTI) for virtual versus in-person visits.
Data were extracted from the electronic health records of 3 Kaiser Permanente Regions to identify incident NBP and UTI visits from January 2016 through June 2021. Visit modes were classified as virtual (Internet-mediated synchronous chats, telephone visits, or video visits) or in-person. Periods were classified as prepandemic [before the beginning of the national emergency (April 2020)] or recovery (after June 2020). Percentages of patient fulfillment of ancillary services orders were measured for 5 service classes each for NBP and UTI. Differences in percentages of fulfillments were compared between modes within periods and between periods within the mode to assess the possible impact of 3 moderators: distance from residence to primary care clinic, high deductible health plan (HDHP) enrollment, and prior use of a mail-order pharmacy program.
For diagnostic radiology, laboratory, and pharmacy services, percentages of fulfilled orders were generally >70-80%. Given an incident NBP or UTI visit, longer distance to the clinic and higher cost-sharing due to HDHP enrollment did not significantly suppress patients' fulfillment of ancillary services orders. Prior use of mail-order prescriptions significantly promoted medication order fulfillments on virtual NBP visits compared with in-person NBP visits in the prepandemic period (5.9% vs. 2.0%, P=0.01) and in the recovery period (5.2% vs. 1.6%, P=0.02).
Distance to the clinic or HDHP enrollment had minimal impact on the fulfillment of diagnostic or prescribed medication services associated with incident NBP or UTI visits delivered virtually or in-person; however, prior use of mail-order pharmacy option promoted fulfillment of prescribed medication orders associated with NBP visits.
背景/目的:近年来,有两种情况改变了初级保健中的医患互动:虚拟(例如,视频)就诊取代了面对面就诊,以及 COVID-19 大流行。我们研究了在虚拟就诊和面对面就诊的情况下,获得医疗服务的机会是否会影响患者对辅助服务医嘱的执行情况,这些医嘱涉及门诊诊断和管理偶发性颈痛或背痛(NBP)和偶发性尿路感染(UTI)。
从 Kaiser Permanente 三个地区的电子健康记录中提取数据,以确定 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间偶发性 NBP 和 UTI 就诊。就诊模式分为虚拟(互联网介导的同步聊天、电话就诊或视频就诊)或面对面就诊。就诊时期分为大流行前(2020 年 4 月国家紧急状态开始前)和恢复期(2020 年 6 月后)。测量了 NBP 和 UTI 每个就诊时期的 5 种服务类别的患者对辅助服务医嘱的执行率。在时期内比较模式之间的执行率差异,以及在模式内比较时期之间的执行率差异,以评估 3 个调节因素的可能影响:居住地到初级保健诊所的距离、高免赔额健康计划(HDHP)的参保情况以及之前使用邮购药房计划的情况。
对于诊断影像学、实验室和药学服务,已执行的医嘱百分比通常在 70%-80%以上。在偶发性 NBP 或 UTI 就诊时,距离诊所较远和因 HDHP 参保而导致的更高自付费用并没有显著抑制患者对辅助服务医嘱的执行。在大流行前时期(5.9%比 2.0%,P=0.01)和恢复期(5.2%比 1.6%,P=0.02),与面对面 NBP 就诊相比,之前使用邮购处方显著促进了虚拟 NBP 就诊时的药物医嘱执行率。
距离诊所或 HDHP 参保对虚拟或面对面就诊时偶发性 NBP 或 UTI 就诊相关的诊断或处方药物服务的执行情况影响很小;然而,之前使用邮购药房选项促进了 NBP 就诊时处方药物医嘱的执行。