• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1996 年至 2018 年美国邮购药店使用趋势:医疗支出面板调查分析。

Trends in Mail-Order Pharmacy Use in the U.S. From 1996 to 2018: An Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

机构信息

Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2021 Aug;61(2):e63-e72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.017. Epub 2021 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.017
PMID:33958237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8319048/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of mail-order pharmacies is generally associated with lower healthcare costs and improved medication adherence. To promote the use of mail-order pharmacies, it is important to understand the time trends in their use and whether these trends vary by population subgroups.

METHODS

This study used the 1996-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to determine the annual prevalence of mail-order pharmacy use (defined as purchasing ≥1 prescription from a mail-order or online pharmacy) among U.S. adult prescription users and its variation by population characteristics. Logistic regression was used to determine the correlates of mail-order pharmacy use. Results were presented for medications and therapeutic classes most commonly purchased by mail-order pharmacy exclusive users. Analyses were conducted in December 2020.

RESULTS

The annual prevalence of mail-order pharmacy use among U.S. adult prescription users increased from 10.2% (95% CI=9.3, 11.1) in 1996 to 17.0% (95% CI=15.9, 18.1) in 2005 and then declined to 15.7% (95% CI=14.9, 16.6) by 2018. Absolute differences in the prevalence of use by race/ethnicity, education, and health insurance coverage widened over time, whereas they remained stable when stratifying by sex, age, marital status, region, limitations in daily activities, pain interference, health status, number of chronic conditions, and access to medical care. Among mail-order pharmacy exclusive users, the 3 most commonly purchased medications were atorvastatin (16.7%), levothyroxine (13.6%), and lisinopril (13.1%); the 3 most commonly purchased therapeutic classes were cardiovascular agents (57.9%), metabolic agents (52.1%), and central nervous system agents (29.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of mail-order pharmacy use has declined in recent years and has shown significant variation across population subgroups. Future research should examine whether the declining trends and variation in use may influence the management of chronic conditions and the disparities in health and healthcare costs.

摘要

简介

邮购药店的使用通常与降低医疗成本和提高药物依从性有关。为了促进邮购药店的使用,了解其使用的时间趋势以及这些趋势是否因人群亚组而异非常重要。

方法

本研究使用 1996 年至 2018 年的医疗支出面板调查,确定美国成年处方药使用者中邮购药店使用(定义为从邮购或在线药店购买≥1 种处方)的年度流行率及其随人口特征的变化。使用逻辑回归确定邮购药店使用的相关性。结果以邮购药店专用用户最常购买的药物和治疗类别呈现。分析于 2020 年 12 月进行。

结果

在美国成年处方药使用者中,邮购药店使用的年度流行率从 1996 年的 10.2%(95%CI=9.3,11.1)上升到 2005 年的 17.0%(95%CI=15.9,18.1),然后在 2018 年下降到 15.7%(95%CI=14.9,16.6)。按种族/民族、教育程度和医疗保险覆盖范围划分的使用流行率的绝对差异随时间扩大,而按性别、年龄、婚姻状况、地区、日常活动受限、疼痛干扰、健康状况、慢性病数量和获得医疗保健的情况分层时则保持稳定。在邮购药店专用用户中,最常购买的 3 种药物是阿托伐他汀(16.7%)、左甲状腺素(13.6%)和赖诺普利(13.1%);最常购买的 3 个治疗类别是心血管药物(57.9%)、代谢药物(52.1%)和中枢神经系统药物(29.6%)。

结论

近年来,邮购药店的使用有所减少,并且在人群亚组之间存在显著差异。未来的研究应该检查使用减少的趋势和变化是否会影响慢性病的管理以及健康和医疗成本的差异。

相似文献

1
Trends in Mail-Order Pharmacy Use in the U.S. From 1996 to 2018: An Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.1996 年至 2018 年美国邮购药店使用趋势:医疗支出面板调查分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Aug;61(2):e63-e72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.017. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Characteristics of Mail-Order Pharmacy Users: Results From the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey.邮购药房使用者的特征:医疗支出小组调查结果
J Pharm Pract. 2020 Jun;33(3):293-298. doi: 10.1177/0897190018800188. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
3
Factors associated with choice of pharmacy setting among DoD health care beneficiaries aged 65 years or older.65岁及以上国防部医疗保健受益人群中与药房选择相关的因素。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Oct;13(8):677-86. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.8.677.
4
Trends in Mail-Order Prescription Use among U.S. Adults from 1996 to 2018: A Nationally Representative Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.1996年至2018年美国成年人邮购处方药使用趋势:一项全国代表性重复横断面研究
medRxiv. 2020 Sep 23:2020.09.22.20199505. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.22.20199505.
5
Associations between pharmacy choice and influenza vaccination: Mail order vs community pharmacy users.药店选择与流感疫苗接种之间的关联:邮购与社区药店使用者。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Dec;28(12):1379-1391. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.12.1379.
6
Patient characteristics associated with multiple pharmacy use in the U.S. population: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.美国人群中与多种药物使用相关的患者特征:医疗支出小组调查结果
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Jul-Aug;11(4):507-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
7
The comparative effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use vs. local pharmacy use on LDL-C control in new statin users.新使用他汀类药物患者中,邮购药店用药与当地药店用药对 LDL-C 控制的比较效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec;26(12):1396-402. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1805-7. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
8
Multiple pharmacy use and types of pharmacies used to obtain prescriptions.多重用药和用于获取处方的药店类型。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Nov-Dec;53(6):601-10. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.13040.
9
Attitudes of Medicare-eligible Americans toward mail service pharmacy.符合医疗保险资格的美国人对邮购药房的态度。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Sep;19(7):564-72. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.7.564.
10
Consumers' characteristics associated with the use of mail pharmacy services in the United States: Findings from the 2015 National Consumer Survey on the Medication Experience.美国与使用邮购药房服务相关的消费者特征:2015年全国药物治疗体验消费者调查结果
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Mar-Apr;57(2):206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Pressure-Elevating and Antihypertensive Medication Prescription Trends.血压升高及抗高血压药物处方趋势
Hypertension. 2025 Jun;82(6):1106-1115. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24316. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
Vulnerability Index Approach to Identify Pharmacy Deserts and Keystone Pharmacies.识别药房荒漠和关键药房的脆弱性指数方法
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250715. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0715.
3
Early findings on home delivery of buprenorphine and retention in treatment for opioid use disorder.丁丙诺啡家庭给药及阿片类物质使用障碍治疗留存率的早期研究结果

本文引用的文献

1
Differences Between Races in Health Information Seeking and Trust Over Time: Evidence From a Cross-Sectional, Pooled Analyses of HINTS Data.种族间健康信息寻求和信任的差异随时间变化:来自 HINTS 数据的横断面、汇总分析的证据。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):84-92. doi: 10.1177/0890117120934609. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Rising Trends in Medication Non-compliance and Associated Worsening Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Outcomes Among Hospitalized Adults Across the United States.美国住院成年人中药物治疗不依从性的上升趋势及其相关的心血管和脑血管不良后果恶化
Cureus. 2019 Aug 14;11(8):e5389. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5389.
3
Trends in Oral Antibiotic Prescription in Dermatology, 2008 to 2016.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Feb 12;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00545-2.
4
Disadvantaged groups have greater spatial access to pharmacies in New York state.弱势群体在纽约州获得药店服务的空间机会更大。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10901-8.
5
State Telepharmacy Policies and Pharmacy Deserts.州远程药学政策与药学荒漠
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328810. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28810.
6
Did Access to Ambulatory Care Moderate the Associations Between Visit Mode and Ancillary Services Utilization Across the COVID-19 Pandemic Period?在 COVID-19 大流行期间,门诊护理的可及性是否缓和了就诊模式与辅助服务利用之间的关联?
Med Care. 2023 Apr 1;61(Suppl 1):S39-S46. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001832. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
7
Associations between pharmacy choice and influenza vaccination: Mail order vs community pharmacy users.药店选择与流感疫苗接种之间的关联:邮购与社区药店使用者。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Dec;28(12):1379-1391. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.12.1379.
8
Structural Racism, Place, and COVID-19: A Narrative Review Describing How We Prepare for an Endemic COVID-19 Future.结构性种族主义、地域与新冠疫情:一篇叙述性综述,描述我们如何为新冠疫情的地方流行未来做准备。
Health Equity. 2022 May 12;6(1):356-366. doi: 10.1089/heq.2021.0190. eCollection 2022.
2008 年至 2016 年皮肤科口服抗生素处方趋势。
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Mar 1;155(3):290-297. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4944.
4
Characteristics of Mail-Order Pharmacy Users: Results From the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey.邮购药房使用者的特征:医疗支出小组调查结果
J Pharm Pract. 2020 Jun;33(3):293-298. doi: 10.1177/0897190018800188. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
5
Antibiotic Expenditures by Medication, Class, and Healthcare Setting in the United States, 2010-2015.美国 2010-2015 年按药物、类别和医疗保健机构划分的抗生素支出情况。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):185-190. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix773.
6
Consumers' characteristics associated with the use of mail pharmacy services in the United States: Findings from the 2015 National Consumer Survey on the Medication Experience.美国与使用邮购药房服务相关的消费者特征:2015年全国药物治疗体验消费者调查结果
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Mar-Apr;57(2):206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
7
Examination of the Link Between Medication Adherence and Use of Mail-Order Pharmacies in Chronic Disease States.检查慢性病患者的药物依从性与使用邮购药店之间的联系。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Nov;22(11):1247-1259. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.11.1247.
8
Examining health literacy disparities in the United States: a third look at the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL).审视美国的健康素养差异:第三次审视成人识字能力国家评估(NAAL)。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;16(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3621-9.
9
Effect of the Affordable Care Act on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Insurance Coverage.《平价医疗法案》对医疗保险覆盖范围中种族和族裔差异的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Aug;106(8):1416-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303155. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
The Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Disparities: A Systematic Review.健康素养与健康差距之间的关系:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145455. eCollection 2015.