• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚南部地区慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者接受同伴主导的自我管理计划的可接受性:一项定性研究。

Acceptability of a peer-led self-management program for people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in regional Southern Tasmania in Australia: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Physiotherapy Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.

Tasmanian School of Medicine College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

出版信息

Chronic Illn. 2024 Mar;20(1):96-104. doi: 10.1177/17423953231163450. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1177/17423953231163450
PMID:36895141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10865749/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

People living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in regional communities experience a higher disease burden and have poorer access to support services. This study sought to investigate the acceptability of a peer-led self-management program (SMP) in regional Tasmania, Australia.

METHODS

This descriptive qualitative study, underpinned by interpretivism used semi-structured one-to-one interviews to gather data to explore COPD patients' views of peer-led SMPs. Purposeful sampling recruited a sample of 8 women and 2 men. Data was analysed using a thematic approach.

RESULTS

The three final themes, 'Normality and Living with the disease', a 'Platform for sharing' and 'Communication mismatch' suggest that peer-led SMPs could offer an opportunity to share experiences. The themes also suggest that COPD often manifested as a deviation from 'normal life'. Communication was often felt to be ambiguous leading to tension between the health experts and people living with the condition.

DISCUSSION

Peer-led SMP has the potential to provide the much-needed support for people living with COPD in regional communities. This will ensure that they are empowered to live with the condition with dignity and respect. Benefits of exchanging ideas and socialisation should not be ignored and may enhance sustainability of SMPs.

摘要

目的

居住在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的地区社区的人会承受更高的疾病负担,且获得支持服务的机会较差。本研究旨在调查在澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚地区,同伴主导的自我管理计划(SMP)的可接受性。

方法

本描述性定性研究以解释主义为基础,采用半结构式一对一访谈收集数据,以探讨 COPD 患者对同伴主导的 SMP 的看法。采用目的性抽样招募了 8 名女性和 2 名男性。使用主题方法进行数据分析。

结果

三个最终主题,即“正常生活和疾病共存”、“分享的平台”和“沟通错位”,表明同伴主导的 SMP 可以提供分享经验的机会。这些主题还表明,COPD 通常表现为偏离“正常生活”。沟通常常被认为是模糊的,导致健康专家和患有该疾病的人之间产生紧张关系。

讨论

同伴主导的 SMP 有可能为地区社区中患有 COPD 的人提供急需的支持。这将确保他们有能力有尊严和尊重地生活。交流思想和社交的好处不应被忽视,并且可能增强 SMP 的可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df7/10865749/2bf30a9563cf/10.1177_17423953231163450-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df7/10865749/2bf30a9563cf/10.1177_17423953231163450-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df7/10865749/2bf30a9563cf/10.1177_17423953231163450-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptability of a peer-led self-management program for people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in regional Southern Tasmania in Australia: A qualitative study.澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚南部地区慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者接受同伴主导的自我管理计划的可接受性:一项定性研究。
Chronic Illn. 2024 Mar;20(1):96-104. doi: 10.1177/17423953231163450. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Benefits of the 'village': a qualitative exploration of the patient experience of COPD in rural Australia.“村落”的益处:对澳大利亚农村慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者体验的质性探索
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e030953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030953.
3
Stage 1 development of a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).患者报告的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)体验量表(PREM)的第一阶段开发。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Jul 24;27(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0047-5.
4
The preferences of people with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for self-management support: A qualitative descriptive study.哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对自我管理支持的偏好:一项定性描述性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Oct;30(19-20):2832-2841. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15790. Epub 2021 May 12.
5
Older Patients' Perspectives of Online Health Approaches in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.老年患者对慢性阻塞性肺疾病在线健康方法的看法
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Sep;25(9):840-846. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0098. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
6
Web-Based Self-management Program (SPACE for COPD) for Individuals Hospitalized With an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Nonrandomized Feasibility Trial of Acceptability.基于网络的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重住院患者自我管理项目(SPACE for COPD):可接受性的非随机可行性试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 11;9(6):e21728. doi: 10.2196/21728.
7
Experiences and Factors Affecting Usage of an eHealth Tool for Self-Management Among People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用电子健康工具进行自我管理的体验及影响因素:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 30;23(4):e25672. doi: 10.2196/25672.
8
The patient journey in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): a human factors qualitative international study to understand the needs of people living with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的就医历程:一项定性的国际人类因素研究,旨在了解 COPD 患者的需求。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02796-8.
9
Factors Influencing Self-Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Community-Dwelling Adults.影响社区居住成年人慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的因素。
West J Nurs Res. 2020 Jun;42(6):423-430. doi: 10.1177/0193945919865532. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
Self-management practice, associated factors and its relationship with health literacy and patient activation among multi-morbid COPD patients from rural Nepal.尼泊尔农村多合并症 COPD 患者的自我管理实践、相关因素及其与健康素养和患者激活的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8404-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Stigma Experiences in People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Integrative Review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的污名体验:综合评价。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jun 4;16:1647-1659. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S306874. eCollection 2021.
2
Enhancing Confidence and Coping with Stigma in an Ambiguous Interaction with Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of People with COPD.在与初级保健的模糊互动中增强信心和应对污名:COPD 患者的定性研究。
COPD. 2020 Oct;17(5):533-542. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1824217. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
Two faces of the same coin: a qualitative study of patients' and carers' coexistence with chronic breathlessness associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
同一枚硬币的两面:一项对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)相关慢性呼吸困难患者和护理者共存的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 May 6;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00572-7.
4
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
5
A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care.基层医疗中慢性病管理干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 9;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0692-3.
6
A qualitative study of patients' experiences of participating in SPACE for COPD: a Self-management Programme of Activity, Coping and Education.一项关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者参与“慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理计划:活动、应对与教育”(SPACE for COPD)体验的定性研究。
ERJ Open Res. 2017 Oct 4;3(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00017-2017. eCollection 2017 Oct.
7
Understanding the factors affecting self-management of COPD from the perspectives of healthcare practitioners: a qualitative study.从医护人员的角度理解 COPD 自我管理的影响因素:一项定性研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Sep 18;27(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0054-6.
8
Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research.健康科学研究中的定性描述方法
HERD. 2016 Jul;9(4):16-25. doi: 10.1177/1937586715614171. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
Evaluation of a self-management programme for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理项目的评估
Chron Respir Dis. 2014 Aug 1;11(3):163-172. doi: 10.1177/1479972314539979. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
10
Self-management: a comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions.自我管理:慢性病管理的综合方法。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):e25-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302041. Epub 2014 Jun 12.