Baig Mirza Asfand, Boardman Timothy, Okasha Mohamed, El-Hariri Hazem Mohamed, Al Banna Qusai, Syrris Christoforos, Baig Mirza Kaumal, Vastani Amisha, Visagan Ravindran, Shapey Jonathan, Maratos Eleni, Barazi Sinan, Thomas Nick
Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022 Jun 8;84(2):143-156. doi: 10.1055/a-1757-3069. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) remains a challenge and is associated with high morbidity. We perform a primary repair with f at in the pituitary f ossa and further fat in the s phenoid sinus (FFS). We compare the efficacy of this FFS technique with other repair methods and perform a systematic review. This is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing standard TSS from 2009 to 2020, comparing the incidence of significant postoperative CSF rhinorrhea (requiring intervention) using the FFS technique compared with other intraoperative repair strategies. Systematic review of current repair methods described in the literature was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In all, there were 439 patients, with 276 patients undergoing multilayer repair, 68 patients FFS repair, and 95 patients no repair. No significant differences were observed in baseline demographics between the groups. Postoperative CSF leak requiring intervention was significantly lower in the FFS repair group (4.4%) compared with the multilayer (20.3%) and no repair groups (12.6%, < 0.01). This translated to fewer reoperations (2.9% FFS vs. 13.4% multilayer vs. 8.4% no repair, < 0.05), fewer lumbar drains (2.9% FFS vs. 15.6% multilayer vs. 5.3% no repair, < 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (median days: 4 [3-7] FFS vs. 6 (5-10) multilayer vs. 5 (3-7) no repair, < 0.01). Risk factors for postoperative leak included female gender, perioperative lumbar drain, and intraoperative leak. Autologous fat on fat graft for standard endoscopic transsphenoidal approach effectively reduces the risk of significant postoperative CSF leak with reduced reoperation and shorter hospital stay.
内镜经蝶窦手术(TSS)后发生脑脊液(CSF)漏仍然是一项挑战,且与高发病率相关。我们在垂体窝使用脂肪进行初次修复,并在蝶窦进一步填充脂肪(FFS)。我们将这种FFS技术的疗效与其他修复方法进行比较,并进行系统评价。
这是一项对2009年至2020年接受标准TSS患者的回顾性分析,比较使用FFS技术与其他术中修复策略术后严重脑脊液鼻漏(需要干预)的发生率。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对文献中描述的当前修复方法进行系统评价。
总共439例患者,其中276例接受多层修复,68例接受FFS修复,95例未进行修复。各组间基线人口统计学特征无显著差异。与多层修复组(20.3%)和未修复组(12.6%,P<0.01)相比,FFS修复组术后需要干预的脑脊液漏显著更低(4.4%)。这意味着再次手术更少(FFS组为2.9%,多层修复组为13.4%,未修复组为8.4%,P<0.05),腰大池引流更少(FFS组为2.9%,多层修复组为15.6%,未修复组为5.3%,P<0.01),住院时间更短(中位数天数:FFS组为4[3 - 7]天,多层修复组为6[5 - 10]天,未修复组为5[3 - 7]天,P<0.01)。术后漏的危险因素包括女性、围手术期腰大池引流和术中漏。
自体脂肪移植用于标准内镜经蝶窦入路可有效降低术后严重脑脊液漏的风险,减少再次手术并缩短住院时间。